Categories
Articles

Is Ulrich’s Move at Target Good for Bill Ackman? $$

A new CEO always makes some changes. Will Steinhafel look closer at Pershing Square’s proposal?

Wall St. Newsletters

Here is the news:

The WSJ Reports:

Target Corp. said chairman Bob Ulrich will retire at the end of the month, and will be succeeded by Chief Executive Gregg Steinhafel, completing a transition that began when Mr. Steinhafel was tapped for his current post a year ago.

Mr. Ulrich will become chairman emeritus, the retailer said.

The 53-year old Mr. Steinhafel joined Target in 1979 and became president in 1999. Target announced last January that he would succeed Mr. Ulrich as CEO, although he didn’t take the reins until last May. He was named to the board two years ago.

Mr. Ulrich has spent his entire 41-year career at Target and its predecessor company, Dayton’s, starting as a merchandise trainee. He became its president in 1984 and chairman and CEO three years later. Mr. Ulrich is credited with creating Target’s “cheap chic” marketing strategy some 20 years ago.

Like so many other retailers, Target has been struggling with slackening sales as shoppers rein in discretionary spending in the face of the housing-market collapse, the financial-markets meltdown, gyrating gasoline prices and tight credit. Last week Target said its December same-store sales fell 4.1%, in line with its expectations. But it said that markdowns “pressured profits.”

In addition to slowing sales, Target’s profits have suffered as an increasing number of its shoppers default on credit-card payments.

“As we look to the future, we are completely confident in Gregg’s leadership and his ability to build on Bob Ulrich’s legacy by continuing to deliver a superior guest experience,” said Vice Chairman Jim Johnson.

Now, let’s look back at the proposal from Ackman:

The plan was endorsed by Lazard.

Target (TGT) is facing increasing credit card losses on it portfolio. It should be noted that these losses are smaller that would have been had they not listened to Ackman and sold 1/2 the portfolio to JP Morgan (JPM).

What the transaction proposed by Ackman does (listen to the presentation for more detail) is frees up a very valuable commodity right now for any retailer….cash. It lowers land acquisition costs for expansion, increases cash flow to the retailer, lowers capex costs and more.

What is not clear was why the Ackman deal was really declined. Here is the press release put out at the time.

Here is the interesting part. When this was issued, Ackman’s reply was that he would “wait until after the holiday’s to address concern’s with management”. Now we see Ulrich retire. Are the two actions related? Was Ulrich standing in the way of the deal and did he hold sway over management and the rest of the board? Did Ackman know this was coming and was this the reason for his dropping the issue for the time being?


Disclosure (“none” means no position):None
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Apple: MSM vs Bloggers

Jim Goldman had a tough (deservedly so) 24 hours. Watch. After essentially mocking and condescending blogger’s reports Apple’s (AAPL) Steve Jobs was sick, Goldman now has explaining to do.

Wall St. Newsletters

CNBC’s own Dylan Ratigan takes him to task.

“Fake Steve Jobs” says he got “punked” by the Apple spin machine. The comment got Fake Steve banned from the network.

Notable Statements:
Dennis Kneale says “The dirty secret of journalism is that you have to believe most of what you are told”

There was a very interesting exchange later in which Goldman says “Until I am privy to Steve Jobs’ medical record all I am telling you is what my sources tell me who I trust and what the company tells me.”

Then Kneale pipes back in and says “Goldman reported what he was told and that’s what a good journalist does”.

Fake Steve make the best point when he says “If your just going to repeat press releases, why have the press, why not just let Apple put out press releases and why have a Bureau out in Silicon Valley?”

Here is the problem. If you had just listened to Goldman for the past 8 months you would have believed until last week everything with Jobs was fine. Had you read blogs, doubt would have crept into your mind. What you did with that information would have been up to you. The point is that you would have had more information to make a decision.

The same could be said of CNBC’s Phil LeBeau in his coverage of the automakers Ford (F), GM (GM) and Chrysler.. Both Goldman and LeBeau are careful to protect their access to those they cover by not being overtly critical of them. When they are critical is is posed as “there are those who say……” and then “how do you respond to that……”

Fake Steve was right in saying why have the press there and why not just let them put out press releases. The only purpose Goldman and LeBeau serve in their respective jobs is to publicly disclosed those release and allow those they cover to strategically leaked information they want out in the public. They are information conduit for the company’s they cover, they are not doing a public service to viewers.

LeBeau’s coverage is especially aggregious as he covers an industry that one would be hard to find has been more mismanaged for the past three decades the US automakers. Yet, if one goes back and looks at the coverage of Detroit from LeBeau, it is painfully apologetic to them and his defense of theory need for bailout funds could only have come from the PR departments of the auto makers.

Now, if that is what they are supposed to be then that is fine, but let’s not pretend we are doing something else and more importantly, lets not talk so dismissively about those who are not acting in that role and who are raising questions that ought to be answered.

If the MSM wonders why they become less relevant on a daily basis, they need only look at these examples…

for ore on the Jobs angles, please read The Ponderings of Woodrow

Disclosure (“none” means no position):None
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

2008 Foreclosures Jump 81%, Dimon Sees Loan Demand Fall

From Realty Trac….

Wall St. Newsletters

RealtyTrac®, the leading online marketplace for foreclosure properties, today released its 2008 U.S. Foreclosure Market Report™, which shows a total of 3,157,806 foreclosure filings — default notices, auction sale notices and bank repossessions — were reported on 2,330,483 U.S. properties during the year, an 81 percent increase in total properties from 2007 and a 225 percent increase in total properties from 2006. The report also shows that 1.84 percent of all U.S. housing units (one in 54) received at least one foreclosure filing during the year, up from 1.03 percent in 2007.

Foreclosure filings were reported on 303,410 U.S. properties in December, up 17 percent from the previous month and up nearly 41 percent from December 2007. Despite the spike in December, foreclosure activity for the fourth quarter was down nearly 4 percent from the previous quarter but still up nearly 40 percent from the fourth quarter of 2007.

RealtyTrac publishes the largest and most comprehensive national database of foreclosure and bank-owned properties, with over 1.5 million properties from over 2,200 counties across the country, and is the foreclosure data provider to MSN Real Estate, Yahoo! Real Estate and The Wall Street Journal’s Real Estate Journal.

“State legislation that slowed down the onset of new foreclosure activity clearly had an effect on fourth quarter numbers overall, but that effect appears to have worn off by December,” said James J. Saccacio, chief executive officer of RealtyTrac. “The big jump in December foreclosure activity was somewhat surprising given the moratoria enacted by both Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, along with programs from some of the major lenders and loan servicers aimed at delaying foreclosure actions against distressed homeowners.

“Clearly the foreclosure prevention programs implemented to-date have not had any real success in slowing down this foreclosure tsunami. And the recent California law, much like its predecessors in Massachusetts and Maryland, appears to have done little more than delay the inevitable foreclosure proceedings for thousands of homeowners.”

The California law (SB1137), which required lenders to provide written notice of their intent to initiate foreclosure proceedings 30 days prior to issuing a notice of default (NOD), resulted in a reduction of NODs from 44,278 in August to 21,665 in September. Notice of Default filings then surged by 122 percent, to over 42,000, in December. Similar patterns have occurred in other states, such as Massachusetts and Maryland, where similar types of foreclosure prevention legislation has been enacted.

Nevada, Florida, Arizona post top state foreclosure rates in 2008
More than 7 percent of Nevada housing units (one in 14) received at least one foreclosure notice in 2008, giving it the nation’s highest state foreclosure rate for the year. A total of 77,693 Nevada properties received a foreclosure filing during the year, an increase of nearly 126 percent from 2007 and an increase of nearly 530 percent from 2006.

Florida registered the nation’s second highest state foreclosure rate in 2008, with 4.52 percent of its housing units (one in 22) receiving at least one foreclosure filing during the year, and Arizona registered the nation’s third highest state foreclosure rate, with 4.49 percent of its housing units (one in 22) receiving at least one foreclosure filing during the year.

Other states with Top 10 foreclosure rates for 2008 were California, Colorado, Michigan, Ohio, Georgia, Illinois and New Jersey.

California, Florida, Arizona post highest 2008 foreclosure totals
A total of 523,624 California properties received a foreclosure filing in 2008, the nation’s highest state total. Foreclosure activity in the state increased nearly 110 percent from 2007 and nearly 498 percent from 2006.

With 385,309 properties receiving a foreclosure filing in 2008, Florida documented the second highest state total. Florida foreclosure activity increased 133 percent from 2007 and nearly 412 percent from 2006.

Arizona’s 2008 total of 116,911 properties receiving a foreclosure filing was third highest among the states. Foreclosure activity in Arizona increased 203 percent from 2007 and 655 percent from 2006.

Other states with Top 10 totals for 2008 were Ohio, Michigan, Illinois, Texas, Georgia, Nevada and New Jersey.

Sunbelt cities plus Detroit land on top 10 metro foreclosure rates list
With 9.46 percent of its housing units (one in 11) receiving a foreclosure filing during the year, Stockton, Calif., registered the highest foreclosure rate among the nation’s 100 largest metropolitan areas in 2008. Other California cities in the top 10 were Riverside-San Bernardino at No. 3 (8.02 percent, or one in 12 housing units); Bakersfield and No. 4 (6.17 percent, or one in 16 housing units); and Sacramento at No. 9 (5.20 percent, or one in 19 housing units).

Las Vegas documented the second highest metro foreclosure rate in 2008, with 8.89 percent of its housing units (one in 11) receiving a foreclosure filing during the year.

More than 6 percent of Phoenix housing units (one in 17) received a foreclosure filing during the year, giving the city the fifth highest metro foreclosure rate in 2008.

The foreclosure rate in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., ranked No. 6, with 5.95 percent of the metro area’s housing units (one in 17) receiving a foreclosure filing in 2008. Other Florida cities in the top 10 were Orlando at No. 7 (5.48 percent, or one in 18 housing units) and Miami at No. 8 (5.21 percent, or one in 19 housing units).

With 4.52 percent of its housing units (one in 22) receiving a foreclosure filing during the year, Detroit registered the tenth highest metro foreclosure rate in 2008.

On today’s earnings call, JP Morgan (JPM) CEO Jamie Dimon said they saw “loan demand slowing”. this is bad for housing as it means refinancing and purchases are also slowing. It may be a function of people waiting for lower interest rates, it may be a function of tighter lending standards, it may be a function of job losses or the fear of them, and it is most likely a function of all three.

Either way and no matter how it is divided, it is not good news going forward.


Disclosure (“none” means no position):None
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Thursday’s Links

3 scary things, Palm Pre, Hedge funds, 60 Minutes

Wall St. Newsletters

Oh boy

– Everyone loves this phone

Track them

– More reaction to the piece

Disclosure (“none” means no position):
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Why A Second Housing Wave is Inevitable $$

I just do not see how we avoid this…the numbers are just too big..

Wall St. Newsletters

Veneroso Why the Second Wave is Inevitable 6/2008

Publish at Scribd or explore others: Presentations & Slid mortgages recession. banking


Disclosure (“none” means no position):
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

World Bank Commodity Presentation 6/2007 $$

Regarding oil…”If a tsunami of rabid investment and speculative commodity derivative demands hits the commodity markets, it must drive the forward price more above marginal cost than in a
normal bull cycle. The higher the price is driven above marginal cost the more new supply will be encouraged. These high prices will also lead to a more assiduous effort by commodity consumers to economize and substitute, thereby rationing demand. If unusual commodity derivative demands take prices very high and on a sustained basis, the resulting surpluses that will eventually take down these prices will be all the larger.”

Wall St. Newsletters

Here is the presentation on Oil, Metals & Gold
Veneroso Frank-World Bank Presentation Commodity Bubble Metals Manipulation-6!14!2007

Publish at Scribd or explore others: Business Presentations & Slid kuwait bubbles

It is a thesis I agree with. Oil was in a bubble in 2008, and the downside now is the overreaction to that bubble popping. Somewhere is the middle is a good price. Fortunately, the middle is about 100% higher than current levels. We’ll see..

Tickers to play oil: (USO), (DBO), (DXO)

To play gold: (GLD)


Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long DBO, DXO, none
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books
garding oil

Categories
Articles

Wal-Mart CEO Downbeat on 2009 $$

Why does it matter? Wal-Mart (WMT) is the proxy for the US economy now.

Wall St. Newsletters

From Reuters

The chief executive of Wal-Mart Stores Inc (WMT) said on Monday he expects the U.S. economy to remain extraordinarily challenging in the first half of the year and that he was not expecting a quick turnaround.

Lee Scott made the comments at the National Retail Federation’s annual conference being held in New York. He described it as his last public speech as head of the world’s largest retailer before retiring on February 1. Scott said the U.S. government’s efforts to stimulate the economy should have “some impact,” but added: “I don’t see anything that tells me it’s going to turn around quickly.”

“The second half of the year, you would hope, would be better,” he said. “We all hope by next Christmas it certainly isn’t any worse.” Wal-Mart, the discount giant, has been gaining market share in the last year as consumers seek out its low prices on items such as food and medicine to stretch limited budgets.

But a year-long recession, mounting job losses and tighter access to credit combined to produce the worst holiday sales season in nearly four decades, according to the International Council of Shopping Centers. Wal-Mart was not immune to the harsh climate and last week posted lower-than-expected December sales and cut its fourth-quarter profit forecast.

FUNDAMENTAL SHIFT IN SPENDING

Scott said this downturn may fundamentally change people’s spending habits.

“I’m not necessarily convinced that just when all this liquidity and things hit, if you’re going to have the same immediate desire to go back to consumption and debt,” he said, referring to a potential U.S. government stimulus plan. “There are a lot of young people who have learned what it’s like when you are living on the edge and the bad times come.”

Here is the thing. After years of irrational debt, American reacted very rational when they were issued stimulus checks this summer. They paid bills and paid off debt. No matter what comes out of Washington this spring, there is no reason to think US consumers are going on a spending spree anytime soon. There has been a fundamental shift in behavior and the reaction to those summer checks proves it. That means anemic growth at best this year.

None of this takes into account the upcoming Alt-A mortgage train wreck barreling down on a staggering housing market, the possibility of inflation due to the flooding of the market with US dollars, foreigners losing interest in US debt causing a rise in interest rates, etc.

This is just the consumers behavior….

Are we doomed? Hell no. Are we going to enter a depression? No. None of that means the next year or two are going to be pretty or easy though. Just do not expect too much..


Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long WMT
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Wednesday’s Links

Bolling, Obama’s Stimulus, Math, Shaq

Wall St. Newsletters

Gold and Platinum

Doomed to fail

– Try again Prez?

– How much could he possibly have to say?

Disclosure (“none” means no position):
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

My Dire 2009 Outlook, A Rebuttal

So, after my post yesterday I received the following email (reprinted with permission) from a money manager. I am posting it verbatim (only company names added to tickers) and readers can judge who they think is correct…please comment..

Wall St. Newsletters

First, my post from yesterday.
1- Financials:
Will not be touching them and are currently waiting for Wells Fargo (WFC) to rally a bit to sell out of it. Why? I no longer know the rules of investing in them. TARP and its requirements change almost daily. Going forward, the term (interest) the Gov’t demands and the shareholder dilution that accompanies them will become more onerous. That is bad news. Also, the second body blow from housing is due this year and next. That means more suffering for financials and shareholders.

Now, this does not mean I will never invest in them again, just that I think in 2010 we will still be able to buy them at these levels or lower. Is there value in financials? I just cannot quantify it as long as we have shifting rules from the Gov’t.

2- The Market
Up to 9000, then back to 8000 all year. The market will bounce like a ball but never really go anywhere. I think the risk is to the downside as the recession worsens. Unemployment ought to pass 10%, GDP will be negative for the year and credit is still drying up. So, given those, how do we go to 10,000?

That being said, it is a traders market. If you sell options you can make some money here. If you trade the rang you can also. If you are not a trader, don’t try to be one. Be who you are

3- Oil
Have written a lot about it recently. Why? Demand has fallen true, but the unreported story is production has fallen off a cliff also. Oil is not like a faucet. It cannot just be turned back on. A drilling project shuttered because of low prices today cannot just be flipped back on when prices recover. There is a tremendous lag. As crazy as prices were at $147, they are equally as crazy at $47. US production continues to fall, Mexico’s has plummeted and OPEC is more in power than ever. That only serve to heighten the Geo-Political risk of oil. Translation? One wacko can cause a global oil price spike.

I see the most value here now, or at least a market unfettered by arbitrary Gov’t intervention. Yes, I know that most foreign oil companies are govt’t owned, what I am saying is that if you buy oil today, your ownership cannot be diluted by the gov’t like it can and is in equities today.

4- The dollar and inflation….
Has anyone ever seen a scenario when massive supply of an item has not caused a devaluation of it? How can the current US Gov’t’s “running the dollar printing presses full tilt” like they are now NOT lead to a devaluation of the dollar? Here is the problem. The gov’t WANTS inflation to return. It will increase home prices, increase to prices manufacturers get for their goods, increase equity values etc. The problem is, gov’t always overdoes it. That means that they will pump too much into the system and inflation will get away from them.

That genie, once out of the bottle is only pot back in by inflicting more pain on the economy. It then becomes a vicious circle…

The reader email:

“The history from the 1930 shows a Real GDP that has been quite steady when you average out the results of 3.9% in 1930 to 3.17% at present. You can see the annual fluctuations in the chart of Real GDP-below, but we are not investing for 12mos but for ~5yrs. So….my advice is to trust the history and expect 3.0%-3.2% for the next 5yrs-10yrs as well. Certainly there is an inflation risk that Bernanke needs to offset with a vigorous reduction in liquidity as monetary velocity recovers, but my guess is that he will be sensitive to this and that we are more likely to see inflation at less than 2% THAN see it soar to 7%+.

In my view to be able to buy GE (GE) at the current level assuming a future 20% ROE and a 1.4xBV I calculate that I am getting a 14%+ Owner’s Earnings. Since the market capitalizes earnings back to the core inflation + Real GDP = Current Market Rate of Return when psychology improves (I expect this to be at the 5% level in 2yrs-3yrs), THEN an investment in many issues today with GE’s pricing could easily triple.

The only time the market was last priced so that stocks were showing such high earnings yields and owner’s earnings was during high periods of inflation 1974 and 1982 during which 11% core inflation + Real GDP = ~14%. THIS IS NOT THE FACT TODAY WITH INFLATION AT 2.4% AND FALLING!!

I see much to like at present. Oil (DBO) will rise. Many good issues like EOG Resources (EOG), Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ), Suncor (SU) and etc look as attractive as GE. Remember oil cannot rise above its economic value or its value to the economy. Oil at too high a price causes the economy to slow and price then self corrects. Oil can only rise to a level that benefits economic growth.

Higher oil prices spurs investment in alternatives and alternative technologies. We are in a transition period during which weak oil supply will force invention and result in other energy sources not yet deemed viable or even discovered. My favorite economic text is Julian Simon’s “Ultimate Resource II” in which he wrote that the greatest misunderstanding investors seem to have is our own inventive force and its hidden hand within the economy to wring sea change. As OB1 said, “Trust the force!”

I am more bullish than you.”

This is what I love about this stuff. One of us will be right. For the record, I hope the reader is as my long portfolio will do VERY well (I am not short anything). I just do not think he is, for 2009. 2010 may be a different scenario but we need to get through this year first. If 2008 did not teach you a lot can change in the course of a year, nothing will.

So readers, who is right? Please comment and keep it constructive…


Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long DBO, GE, none
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Pershing’s McGuire Named Borders Chairman $$

So, we now know what the delay was for in the Pershing / Borders financing agreement.

Wall St. Newsletters

Borders Group (BGP) today announced that Richard “Mick” McGuire, 32, has been appointed non-executive Chairman of the company’s Board of Directors, effective today. He replaces Larry Pollock, 61, who has been non-executive Chairman since July 2006 and has been a Director since August 1995. Pollock will remain on the Board as a Director.

McGuire joined the Board in January 2008 in connection with his role as a partner at Pershing Square Capital Management, L.P., which is Borders Group’s largest investor. At Pershing Square, McGuire served as a member of the investment team exploring investment opportunities in industries including retail, consumer products, business services and financial services. He is now departing Pershing Square to pursue entrepreneurial interests. Prior to Pershing Square, McGuire held positions at private equity funds J.H. Whitney & Co., and Stonington Partners, Inc. He holds a master’s degree in business administration (MBA) from Harvard Business School and a bachelor’s degree from Princeton University.

“Mick is extremely smart and capable,” said Pershing Square founder and Chief Executive Officer Bill Ackman. “As a major shareholder of Borders, I am delighted with Mick’s appointment to Chairman. I look forward to the company’s progress under Mick’s and CEO Ron Marshall’s stewardship.”

“In the short time that I have worked with Mick, I am impressed with his constructive input, sound judgment and overall support of the company,” said Borders Group Chief Executive Officer Ron Marshall. “I look forward to working more closely with Mick in the expanded role of Chairman and with Mike Archbold in his new role as Lead Director. On behalf of the entire Board and management team, I also want to thank Larry for his years of service as Chairman and am pleased that he’ll remain with the Board as a Director.”

As noted, Michael G. Archbold has been named Lead Director. Archbold, 48, joined the Board in December 2007. He is Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of The Vitamin Shoppe, a position he has held since 2007. Previously, Archbold served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial and Administrative Officer of Saks Fifth Avenue. Prior to Saks, Archbold was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of AutoZone and earlier served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Booksellers Division of Barnes & Noble, Inc.
Pollock, who as noted remains on the Board, is Managing Partner of investment firm Lucky Stars Partners LLC. Previously, he was President, and later Chief Executive Officer, of Cole National Corporation, which operates retail vision and gift stores and was sold to Luxottica Group SpA in 2004. Prior to Cole National, Pollock served as President and Chief Executive Officer of HomePlace, Inc., and earlier was President, Chief Operating Officer and a Director of jewelry retailer Zale Corporation.

It’s Ackman’s ball now. Largest shareholder, Chairman and Chief Financer all in one (two actually but one sounds better).

It will be real interesting to watch..


Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long BGP
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Tuesday’s Links

Starbucks, Blackberry, Credit, Ayn Rand

Wall St. Newsletters

– A new jet to celebrate massive shareholder destruction

– Turn it into a remote

– More problems coming

What happened?

Disclosure (“none” means no position):
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Ackman Files 13D/A in General Growth Properties $$

Ackman now has an interest in nearly 25% of General Growth Properties (GGP) shares

Wall St. Newsletters

On 12/8 Ackman disclosed a 18% economic interest.

In today’s filing he has boosted that to 24%

“This Amendment No. 2 (this “Amendment No. 2”) amends and supplements the statement on Schedule 13D, as previously amended to date (the “Schedule 13D”) by (i) Pershing Square Capital Management, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“Pershing Square”), (ii) PS Management GP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“PS Management”), (iii) Pershing Square GP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Pershing Square GP”), and (iv) William A. Ackman, a citizen of the United States of America (collectively, the “Reporting Persons”), relating to the common stock, par value $.01 per share (the “Common Shares”), of General Growth Properties, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Issuer”). Capitalized terms used herein but not defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Original 13D.

As of January 9, 2009, the Reporting Persons beneficially owned an aggregate of 22,901,194 Common Shares (the “Subject Shares”), representing approximately 7.4% of the outstanding Common Shares. The Reporting Persons also have additional economic exposure to approximately 52,000,000 Common Shares under certain cash-settled total return swaps (“Swaps”), bringing their total aggregate economic exposure to 74,901,194 Common Shares (approximately 24.1% of the outstanding Common Shares). Although this Schedule 13D filing reflects additional purchases of Common Shares and Swaps, the Reporting Persons total beneficial ownership percentage and aggregate economic exposure has decreased due to the dilutive effects arising from the conversion of 42,350,000 common partnership units held in the Issuer’s operating partnership into 42,350,000 Common Shares, as announced by the Issuer on January 5, 2009.”

Here is the trading data:


Disclosure (“none” means no position):None
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Larry Summers 1/12 Letter to Congress

So, I wrote a post this am about TARP and how those receiving funds are going to be faced with mush more onerous restrictions. A few hours later Larry Summers from Barack Obama’s Team obliged with details..

Wall St. Newsletters

Larry Summers Letter to Congress

Publish at Scribd or explore others: United States Politics


Disclosure (“none” means no position):
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Reader Emails Answered: Oil, Financials, Recession, Dollar etc..

Been getting a slew of emails the last months and rather than say the same things over and over, thought I would address them in a post since the themes are all similar..

Wall St. Newsletters

1- Financials:
Will not be touching them and are currently waiting for Wells Fargo (WFC) to rally a bit to sell out of it. Why? I no longer know the rules of investing in them. TARP and its requirements change almost daily. Going forward, the term (interest) the Gov’t demands and the shareholder dilution that accompanies them will become more onerous. That is bad news. Also, the second body blow from housing is due this year and next. That means more suffering for financials and shareholders.

Now, this does not mean I will never invest in them again, just that I think in 2010 we will still be able to buy them at these levels or lower. Is there value in financials? I just cannot quantify it as long as we have shifting rules from the Gov’t.

2- The Market
Up to 9000, then back to 8000 all year. The market will bounce like a ball but never really go anywhere. I think the risk is to the downside as the recession worsens. Unemployment ought to pass 10%, GDP will be negative for the year and credit is still drying up. So, given those, how do we go to 10,000?

That being said, it is a traders market. If you sell options you can make some money here. If you trade the rang you can also. If you are not a trader, don’t try to be one. Be who you are

3- Oil
Have written a lot about it recently. Why? Demand has fallen true, but the unreported story is production has fallen off a cliff also. Oil is not like a faucet. It cannot just be turned back on. A drilling project shuttered because of low prices today cannot just be flipped back on when prices recover. There is a tremendous lag. As crazy as prices were at $147, they are equally as crazy at $47. US production continues to fall, Mexico’s has plummeted and OPEC is more in power than ever. That only serve to heighten the Geo-Political risk of oil. Translation? One wacko can cause a global oil price spike.

I see the most value here now, or at least a market unfettered by arbitrary Gov’t intervention. Yes, I know that most foreign oil companies are govt’t owned, what I am saying is that if you buy oil today, your ownership cannot be diluted by the gov’t like it can and is in equities today.

4- The dollar and inflation….
Has anyone ever seen a scenario when massive supply of an item has not caused a devaluation of it? How can the current US Gov’t’s “running the dollar printing presses full tilt” like they are now NOT lead to a devaluation of the dollar? Here is the problem. The gov’t WANTS inflation to return. It will increase home prices, increase to prices manufacturers get for their goods, increase equity values etc. The problem is, gov’t always overdoes it. That means that they will pump too much into the system and inflation will get away from them.

That genie, once out of the bottle is only pot back in by inflicting more pain on the economy. It then becomes a vicious circle…

5- What to buy?
Right now? I am buying nothing but oil. Why? As much as we have sen the rules of the game change in the past year, still more is due. TARP requirements are, the tax code is, a stimulus is coming (we do not know the composition of it) and a Democratic Congress has plenty on its agenda. What looks good today may not tomorrow. Does this mean you should not buy anything? No. There of course will be plenty of equities that do wonderful in the next year. I just think there will be plenty more that do not.

Management now matters more than ever. Keep it in mind when buying.

Am I selling? Only the financials (sold most in the fall). I still like what I hold, Dow Chemical (DOW), AutoNation (AN), ADM (ADM), Borders (BGP), Oil (DXO), (DBO), Phillip Morris International (PM), Sears Holdings (SHLD) and GE (GE). I do have misgiving about Immelt at GE but am willing to wait as I think they will be a big beneficiary of infrastructure stimulus.

All dominate their businesses (except Borders and Sears, they are plays on the majority shareholders Ackman and Lampert) and are picking up market share. Dow will lead us out of recession as whatever needs to be made, they make the stuff that makes it and it yields 10%.

Wait and see….

This is the environment that one can make purchases that make one look like a genius for decades, it just takes a keen eye….


Disclosure (“none” means no position):
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Bill Gates Continues Buying AutoNation Shares $$

It’s been a few weeks since the last purchase of AutoNation (AN) shares for Gates’ Cascade Investments and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Wall St. Newsletters

On 1/7 Bill Gates, through his Foundation a and Cascade Investments each added another 50,000 shares of the auto retailer.

Total holdings now come to 21.7 million shares or 12.2% of the total.


Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long AN
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books