Month: September 2007
Tuesday’s Links
– While I am not a fan of Greenspan, for Paul Krugman to question to moral honesty of any human being is laughable. Krugman is quite possibly the most dishonest person who has every walked the earth (the Clinton’s aside obviously).
– An economist gives empirical evidence that the Bush administrations troop surge is indeed working. It should be noted that this is an MIT professor so the chance of a “political bias” in favor of the administration is indeed remote..
– Still more on Greenspan
– You reap what you sow
Lehman Brothers (LEH) release earnings this morning and their results, and especially the configuration of them bolstered my confidence and expectations for Goldman’s (GS)on Thursday.
First the details. Lehman beat expectation by seven cents a share coming in at $1.54 vs the $1.47 estimates. Fixed income took the expected write-downs (revenues were off 47%) due to the current mortgage market “instability” but several other areas bolstered the firm and they are the very reasons I was so optimistic yesterday about Goldman.
Strong investment banking and retail brokerage fees pushed revenue up 3.1 percent to $4.31 billion and offset the $700 million hit from “substantial valuation reductions” in mortgage-backed bonds and other investments. In addition, the firm now gets 53% of it revenues from overseas operation, further insulating it from US housing.
The configuration of these results were the very ones I gave yesterday for my opinion that the current estimates for Goldman were too low, trading and overseas. There does seem to be an inability or refusal to see many of our international firms for what they are, international. Companies are seeing the prices of their shares decimated due to the US housing situation and in many cases, the effects of the housing market are not a significant determinant of earnings for them. When more than 1/2 of your revenues come from overseas, the conversation regarding earnings ought to be what is happening there, not in Peoria. This is also is true for the S&P that now gets over 50% of it’s earning from overseas.
Why is this important? Even though we may (that is a big may but for arguments sake let’s assume) be slowing down it the US, overseas is still booming. That means that 51% of earnings will be increasing and offsetting any potential decrease here. It is also important to note that this 51% is increasing so the international economy will begin to take on more importance. This is the reason the last few quarters estimates have been below reality. Folks are not quantifying international operations properly, or giving them enough weight..
This is ok though, it gives us more time to accumulate under-priced shares..
Some thoughts on what Altria (MO) investors can hope for after PMI is spun off.
The Dividend:
CEO Louis Camilleri said when the upcoming breakup was announced that the dividend of the two companies “would at least” equal the current one which after the recent 8.7% increase sits at $3.00 per share (4.5% yield). The key is his use of the term “at least”. Camilleri has in the past telegraphed the future intentions of Altria while not committing the company to anything extraordinary. This is one of those occasions. Camilleri said “Going forward, I would anticipate that Altria and PMI would have net earnings payout ratio targets of around 75% and 65%, respectively.” 2006, PMI generated operating cash flow of $6.2 billion, while remaining Altria (excluding Kraft) generated $3.7 billion and both will enjoy very strong balance sheets. What could happens to the dividend? See below after share repurchase section.
Cost Savings
Currently Altria is a bloated pig here. Their cost per 1,000 cigarettes produced is 10% higher that rival Reynolds American (RAI). Altria is taking steps to alleviate that with the closing of their NY city headquarters. The company estimates an annual savings from the move of about $250 million. The separation of the two entities (PMI and PMUSA) also eliminates an additional bureaucratic layer that Reynold’s, who has no international operations is currently without creating additional savings.
Share Repurchases / Debt
Camilleri said one of the advantages of the breakup would be, “A more optimal and efficient capital allocation to enhance shareholder value coupled with greater financial flexibility resulting from an increase in the combined debt capacity of both entities..” and “both companies will have the flexibility and capacity to further enhance shareholder value through share repurchases.” Great but how much? As of June 30th, Altria sits on $6 billion in cash, $4 billion of debt and should generate almost $15 billion in cash from operations this year, meaning as things stand now, debt is irrelevant. How much could it take on? Currently Altria has a long term debt to equity ration of .27 vs 1.25 for the industry. If we bring Altria up to the industry average, we get to a combined debt level of almost $30 billion dollars which would enable the company to repurchase 20% of the outstanding shares.
Here is the kicker. If they do that, and keep the total dividend payout at it’s current $6.3 billion annual level (which would be fully supported by operations), this would enable them to distribute approximately an additional 75 cents per share to shareholders, just from the number of outstanding share reduction. This would bring the combined yield of the two entities to a whopping 5.6%.
Now, none of this takes into consideration share appreciation that is inevitable due to the EPS increase associated with the repurchases. Will all of this happen? Not right away of course but rest assured, Altria has been waiting to reward shareholders for some time, I expect all of the following to happen to some degree early next year .
Tuesday’s Upgrades / Downgrades
UPGRADES
Logitech Intl SA LOGI Avondale Partners Mkt Perform » Mkt Outperform
Fresh Del Monte FDP BB&T Capital Mkts Hold » Buy
Lexington LXP Stifel Nicolaus Hold » Buy
Equinix EQIX Needham & Co Hold » Buy
China Mobile CHL HSBC Securities Neutral » Overweight
Nokia NOK HSBC Securities Neutral » Overweight
Brocade BRCD Citigroup Hold » Buy
Tween Brands TWB Susquehanna Financial Neutral » Positive
Ford Motor F Bear Stearns Peer Perform » Outperform
Temple-Inland TIN UBS Neutral » Buy
DOWNGRADES
Maguire Properties MPG Stifel Nicolaus Hold » Sell
Ryanair Hldgs RYAAY UBS Buy » Neutral
Applebee’s APPB Oppenheimer Neutral » Sell
Aventine Renewable Energy AVR Soleil Buy » Hold
Alcatel-Lucent ALU UBS Buy » Neutral
British Amrcn Tobacco BTI Lehman Brothers Equal-weight » Underweight
Marsh McLennan MMC Citigroup Buy » Hold
Monday’s 52 Week Low’s
More ethanol producers make the list. Will there be an industry consolidation coming?
VSE Verasun Energy Corp 11.21
VAR Varian Med Sys Inc 38.07
THC Tenet Healthcare Corp … 3.17
SPA Sparton Corporation 5.10
SIG Signet Group Plc 16.82
SCVL Shoe Carnival Inc 15.53
RAIL Freightcar Amer Inc 39.72
PGR The Progressive Corpo … 18.91
PEIX Pacific Ethanol Inc 10.43
PBH Prestige Brands Hldgs Inc 10.09
MNI McClatchy Newspapers, Inc 21.23
MMC Marsh & McLennan Comp … 24.67
MGPI Mgp Ingredients Inc 12.23
MGLN Magellan Health Svcs Inc 38.07
MCO Moodys Corp 43.05
CRUS Cirrus Logic Inc 6.30
CRAY Cray Inc 6.10
COT Cott Corp Que 9.76
CNTY Century Casinos Inc 6.41
CLDN Celadon Group Inc 13.52
CHUX O’Charley’s Inc 14.56
AVR Aventine Renewable Energy 11.27
Goldman Sach’s Earnings Preview
Goldman (GS) reports on Thursday and for a stock trading at only 8 times earnings, a blowout number could cause the stock to vault upward.
Fortunately for shareholders (I am one) the recent market turmoil that has dragged Goldman down with it, will be the very thing that enables them to exceed expectations. Financial’s have been hit hard due the “subprime meltdown” (have you heard anything about it?) and rather that search for those companies that are most exposed to this market, the whole group, including Lehman (LEH), Bear Sterns (BSC) and Morgan Stanley (MS) got whacked.
Why not Goldman? Let’s start with 51% of Goldman’s earnings and get them out of the way. They come from overseas (and that percentage may actually be increasing) and will not be affected at all by the US mortgage market. These earnings will increase as activity abroad is surging.
The majority of Goldman’s US revenues are derived from trading activities, for which the current volatility in the markets is advantageous. Consider this: Much had been made of Goldman’s decision to invest $2 billion in one of it’s funds in August as there was a run on hedge funds. Word is that to date that investment has seen a 30% return for Goldman. Current earnings estimates are for $4.30 to $4.50 a share.
I am looking at much closer to $5 a share ($4.80 and above). People have placed way too much emphasis on the mortgage market and it’s relation to Goldman. In all reality, Goldman is a play on the global economy, not a segment of the US economy. There is good news though. Let’s say they only hit the $4.30 estimate. Trading at only 8 times earnings, where is the stock going? It is practically being given away now. We recently picked up more at $176 and any additional fall from here would be anther buying opportunity. Alas, I doubt it will happen.
What is much more likely is that several months from now a whole lot of people are going to be cursing themselves wishing the had bought shares in this company at these ludicrously low prices..
Monday’s Links
– Here is a great post that compares Greenspan to Bernanke. I agree with it totally.
– If you follow commodity markets, here is a great joke
– Greenspan admits his “missed” subprime situation
When I first was alerted to this I thought the person was pulling my leg. Sadly for Rhode Island Attorney General Patrick Lynch, common sense and the image of Rhode Island, it is true.
Lynch is proposing that the three paint companies (Sherwin Williams (SHW), Millenium Holdings and NL Industries (NL)) who lost the public nuisance trial last year (it is now under appeal to the RI Supreme Court)spend $2.4 billion removing lead paint from more than half the houses and apartments in Rhode Island. It is important to note that of the dozen similar cases out there, this is the only loss to date and essentially happened because the Judge, Micheal Silverstein directed a verdict for the plaintiffs with jury instruction so biased against the defense jurors later said “there was no other way but to find but for the plaintiffs”. there are also the trivial little matters of evidence being withheld by the state and the basic rules of law being pushed to the side. This verdict will not only be over turned on appeal, but I would expect public admonishments of both the judge and prosecutors when all is said and done.
The 132 page sophomoric abatement plan (here), if approved, would lead to the single biggest construction job in the history of the state. Perhaps Lynch is trying to one up the success of Boston’s “Big Dig”? Please tell me you understand that is dripping with sarcasm?!?
Lynch’s office wants the three paint companies to clean up paint in 240,000 houses and apartments, 12,969 seasonal housing units, 419 child care centers and 339 elementary schools over a four-year period. It should be noted that at least in the 339 schools, the State of Rhode Island requested lead paint be used “for it’s durability”. No matter to Lynch.
Why is he doing this? PR for jobs in a sagging Rhodie Island economy. He is proposing 10,000 workers be hired to complete the work in an “expeditious” manner. The job of replacing over half the windows and doors in the state would require a “substantial training and outreach effort . . . to attract the needed workforce,” Lynch said.
So there we are. Let’s not forget that DuPont (DD) was left off the hook here. Why? They made a nice contribution to Brown, Lynch’s alma mater via their “settlement”. Oh yeah, they also made another contribution to a charity they control. I blogged on how much this DuPont thing reeks before, please read it.
Now we can move on to the lunacy of the plan. When it lead paint dangerous? When it is sitting on a windowsill or door? No. It is dangerous when it is release into the air and digested. What Lynch wants to do is essentially cause the most massive release of lead into the air in history. There is no “100% effective” way to remove lead paint without releasing particles into the air. Every remediation expert will tell you the safest way is to “encapsulate it” (paint over) but that will not cost $2.4 billion, create 10,000 jobs or any headlines, so, screw it. Lynch now wants to ramp up hiring those folks who are unemployed to do the job? Will they at least be given a videotape to watch first on how to do it?
Says the report “numerous studies have shown that the monetary benefits of controlling lead far outweigh the costs”. Really? does this mean Sherwin Williams will sell more paint there? I am sure it does outweigh them Patrick, especially when you consider they are not your “costs”. Is this guy serious? The plan will also create some cushy $75,000 a year “supervisory” positions for some folks, maybe some friends of Lynch need more work?
The best view of it? Scott Smith, an attorney for Millennium Holdings said, “We believe the state plan is, in a word ridiculous. It is completely unprecedented, it’s unworkable and it will, indeed, be harmful to the state.” You mean releasing unprecedented amounts of lead into the air over Rhode Island may be harmful? Who could Lynch sue then? The workers?
For more up to date info, visit Jane Genova’s Law and More
"Fast Money" for Monday
Jeff Macke recommended eBay (EBAY). Open $37.81
Guy Adami said he wanted own the Short Dow30 ETF (DOG). Open $59.31
Karen Finerman still wanted to hang on to American Standard (ASD). Open $34.83
Pete Najarian liked Rambus (RMBS). Open $17.92
FRIDAY’S RESULTS
Jeff Macke recommended shorting General Motors (GM). Open $33.29 CLOSE $34.22 Gain $.93
Guy Adami said buy the Short Dow30 ETF (DOG). Open $59.46 CLOSE $59.31 Loss $.15
Karen Finerman said buy ConocoPhillips (COP). Open $85.11 CLOSE $85.27 Gain $.16
Pete Najarian liked Sun Microsystems (JAVA) Open $5.80 CLOSE $5.73 Loss $.07
Since my tracking began on 6/21 (1-1 means one up pick and one down pick and no results from my vacation weeks)
Guy Adami= 22-16 Gain $39.86
Eric Bolling= 10-11 Loss $14.01
John Najarian= 13-3 Gain $15.54
Jeff Macke= 27-20 Gain $8.71
Pete Najarian= 15-14 Gain $22.39
Tim Seymore= 3-2 Loss $.49
Karen Finerman= 9-3 Gain $4.69
Stacey Briere-Gilbert= 2-0 Gain $1.61
Lead Paint Litigation Update
The following is courtesy of Jane Genova’s Law and More, the leading Lead Paint Litigation blog in existence.
Companies effected Sherwin Williams (SHW), DuPont (DD) and NL Industries (NL)
These are excerpts from Lexis Nexis Mealey’s Litigation Report, Volume 16, Issue #11, September 2007. Documents associated with the legal matters discussed are available from Mealey’s or by contacting James Cordrey, Editor, Lexis Nexis Legal News, James.cordrey@lexisnexis.com, 610-205-1125.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ATTORNEY GENERAL SUES LANDLORDS
On August 16, Linda Singer, Attorney General for the District of Columbia, filed the last of 12 lawsuits in D.C. Superior Court against landlords for failure to abate lead-based paint hazards. These sought injunctive relief. Those health hazards had been discovered during Health Department inspections.
Enforcing laws against landlords has been what the former lead paint industry has been advocating for about two decades. Most states and cities already have those laws on the books. However, they are frequently not enforced. It could be effective for tort reformers to create a formal study of what factors mitigate against enforcement.
SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA CONTINGENCY ARGUMENTS CONTINUE
Santa Clara County, which is appealing Judge Jack Komar’s April 4th ruling against the use of contingency in public nuisance litigation, argues that federal law doesn’t mandate that government attorneys be absolutely neutral, even in criminal matters. It goes further in contending that attorneys participating in public nuisance should be held to the same standard as a criminal prosecutor. According to California law, it claims, criminal prosecutors are not recused, absent showing actual bias which could deprive defendant of a fair trial.
In addition, the county on August 14 filed an opposition to defendant ARCO’s request for judicial notice. The county contends that ARCO failed to follow rules of procedure in doing so.
Meanwhile, amicus curiae briefs are being filed by organizations supporting Judge Komar’s ruling. Those organizations include the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the American Tort Reform Association and, most recently, the American Chemistry Council. Essentially the amici argue that contingency arrangements with government entities are “suspect,” unconstitutional and violate legal ethics. In addition, those arrangements often cause conflicts of interest, excessive fees and a “revolving door” which reduces the public’s faith in government.
Since California is a trend-setting state which has an activist attorney general Jerry Brown this contingency battle is being closely watched. If the plaintiff wins its appeal then the door is opened for other public nuisance litigation, such as global warming, to move forward on a contingency basis.
OHIO SUPREME COURT AMENDS AUGUST 1 RULING ON “117,” ALLOWING FILING OF REFERENDUM AGAINST EXTENSION OF PUBLIC NUISANCE TO LEAD-PAINT LITIGATION
A divided Ohio Supreme Court allowed opponents of “117” to try to obtain enough signatures on a petition to put the matter to the voters in 2008 as a referendum. The deadline for those signatures in October 30th. If voters eventually say no to this tort-reform measure, then the former lead-paint industry can be sued by the state for causing a public nuisance. This could again give momentum to such suits in other states and cities. The “117” opponents are positioning their campaign as one for consumer rights.
CITY OF MILWAUKEE PRESENTS ORAL ARGUMENTS FOR CHANGE OF DEFENSE VERDICT OR NEW TRIAL
On September 6th, the plaintiff City of Milwaukee gave oral arguments that the defense verdict should be changed or a new trial granted. One primary argument focused on jury instructions. Defendant NL Industries (NL), of course, argued against this, contending that the court properly instructed the jury that Milawukee was required to prove that its conduct was intentional and unreasonable.
A decision is anticipated by the end of September. If the judge does not grant the city’s request, sources say an appeal is certain.
This litigation, though, is small doings compared to the upcoming “Thomas” trial which can set traditional liability concepts on their ear. All business, not only the former lead paint industry, is watching how this plays out. Opening arguments start October 4. A combination of Wisconsin Supreme Court rulings and Governor Doyle’s veto of tort reform had made this state as potentially a hot zone for anti-business litigation as California. Some contend “Thomas” could be more significant in its implications for business as well as the lead paint industry than has been the infamous Rhode Island Lead Paint Trial II.
Other items from Mealey’s Lead Litigation Report will be discussed in later posts on this blog. I wish to thank James Cordrey, Editor of LexisNexis Legal News, for this information. He can be reached at James.Cordrey@lexisnexus.com or 610-205-1125.
1. Why You Can’t Ignore the Value in HOG
(via www.collegeanalysts.com)
2. Mauboussin on Strategy: Was Harry Potter Inevitable?
(via www.leggmason.com)
3. Harley Davidson: “Below MSRP” Was A Bad Harbinger
4. $30B Worth of Advice
5. ContrarianEdge.com : Anti-Social Investing
Weekend Reading
– Adam Warner is rapidly creating the number one “Best of The Blogsphere” column out there with his “Doing it Bloggystyle” aggregation at Minyanville.com . I read it every time he publishes and recommend you do too. He also has his own blog here.
– Jim Kingsland has a great article here
– Slavery’s effect on Africa
– Eric Chesire has a great take on McDonald’s with links to some very informative sites, great job Eric