Top insider buys listed by dollar amounts…
Dst Systems Inc (DST)- $6,370,000
Delphi Financial Group Inc (DFG)- $3,362,000
Enterprise Products Partners L P (EPD)- $3,293,000
Geokinetics Inc (GOK)- $2,605,000
Chelsea Therapeutics International Ltd (CHTP)- $1,918,000
Xtl Biopharmaceuticals Ltd (XTLB)- $1,879,000
Duncan Energy Partners L P (DEP)- $1,482,000
Annaly Capital Management Inc (NLY)- $1,230,000
Bgc Partners Inc New (BGCP)- $1,152,000
Highland Credit Strategies Fund (HCF)- $1,126,000
Mosys Inc (MOSY)- $1,072,000
Patriot Coal Corp (PCX)- $858,000
Great Southern Bancorp Inc (GSBC)- $790,000
Cascade Financial Corp (CASB)- $788,000
Author: ToddSullivan
The Week's Top Insider Buys
Top insider buys listed by dollar amounts…
Dst Systems Inc (DST)- $6,370,000
Delphi Financial Group Inc (DFG)- $3,362,000
Enterprise Products Partners L P (EPD)- $3,293,000
Geokinetics Inc (GOK)- $2,605,000
Chelsea Therapeutics International Ltd (CHTP)- $1,918,000
Xtl Biopharmaceuticals Ltd (XTLB)- $1,879,000
Duncan Energy Partners L P (DEP)- $1,482,000
Annaly Capital Management Inc (NLY)- $1,230,000
Bgc Partners Inc New (BGCP)- $1,152,000
Highland Credit Strategies Fund (HCF)- $1,126,000
Mosys Inc (MOSY)- $1,072,000
Patriot Coal Corp (PCX)- $858,000
Great Southern Bancorp Inc (GSBC)- $790,000
Cascade Financial Corp (CASB)- $788,000
Ackman on Investing (Part 2)
This part has a pretty detailed discussion on bond insurers Ambac (ABK), MBIA (MBI), banks (Bear Sterns (BSC)) as well as more on Target (TGT).
If you have not seen it, watch part one first:
Disclosure (“none” means no position):None
Time for the Weekend
If you have young kids, watch them dance to this…
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.
After several stories in the MSM and blogs yesterday erroneously said Pershings Bill Ackman flew to Sears Holdings (SHLD) annual meeting to confront Chairman Edward Lampert “because you will not take our calls”, the Tribune issued a correction.
“A story in Tuesday’s business section mischaracterized the reason activist investor William Ackman attended the annual meeting of Sears Holdings Corp. Ackman said he flew to Hoffman Estates from New York to hear Sears Chairman Edward Lampert speak. He had not tried to call Lampert.”
Here is a link to the correction:
This is troubling for the simple reason that the story in the Tribune has fictitious information. Another story in the NY Post reiterated it and one can only come to the conclusion the authors just invented most of it.
What is even worse is the tribune has changed the story online. If you do a Google search for “ackman lampert calls” you get the following results. You’ll notice the Tribune link says “But Ackman traveled thousands of miles to attend the meeting because Lampert wouldn’t take his call, the investor said in an interview after the event…” Yet, that is curiously missing from the story and the correction that has been made is not noted.
The heading “Wouldn’t Take Call” is still there in the actual article, but no mention of what it is talking about. A sloppy whitewash..
It is one things to misquote someone slightly, it is another entirely to invent an conversation…
Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long SHLD
Pandit’s Plan Will Work at Citigroup (C)
A few years from now we will be discussing how wise it was for Pandit to come into Citi and not immediately begin to run around selling assets and chopping head.
With the street screaming for the bank to be instantly broken into pieces, Pandit instead stuck to a very measured plan of selling inconsequential assets, raising capital and doing a thorough top to bottom review. Now, the downside to that is the stock stays stagnant or drops as impatient investors sell wanting satisfaction now.
The good news is that he is acting like an owner of a business making decisions for the long term, not a manger making them for the next quarter.
First, the plan:
Reaction from Daniel Alpert
Reaction from Robert Olstein, owner of 1 million shares.
Olstein is right. Investor with the right time frame will be well rewarded. Patience is going to be the key…a lot of it…
Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long C
Pandit's Plan Will Work at Citigroup (C)
A few years from now we will be discussing how wise it was for Pandit to come into Citi and not immediately begin to run around selling assets and chopping head.
With the street screaming for the bank to be instantly broken into pieces, Pandit instead stuck to a very measured plan of selling inconsequential assets, raising capital and doing a thorough top to bottom review. Now, the downside to that is the stock stays stagnant or drops as impatient investors sell wanting satisfaction now.
The good news is that he is acting like an owner of a business making decisions for the long term, not a manger making them for the next quarter.
First, the plan:
Reaction from Daniel Alpert
Reaction from Robert Olstein, owner of 1 million shares.
Olstein is right. Investor with the right time frame will be well rewarded. Patience is going to be the key…a lot of it…
Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long C
Pershing’s Bill Ackman talks about Target (TGT), Ambac (ABK), Goldman Sachs (GS), sort selling and CDO’s. This is good stuff…
Disclosure (“none” means no position):None
Pershing’s Bill Ackman talks about Target (TGT), Ambac (ABK), Goldman Sachs (GS), sort selling and CDO’s. This is good stuff…
Disclosure (“none” means no position):None
Circuit City Finally Admits it’s Failing
Circuit City (CC) CEO Phil “The Shill” Schoonover must be looking at sales numbers for the current quarter.
Schoonover has finally decided to open the books for Blockbuster (BBI) and billionaire Carl Icahn. A new letter to Blockbuster that was given to Circuit City from Icahn states that, “subject to him being satisfied with his due diligence review of Circuit City to be conducted concurrently with Blockbuster, Mr. Icahn and/or entities affiliated with him stand ready to purchase Circuit City if Blockbuster were unable to receive financing or required shareholder approval to do so after satisfactory due diligence, and assuming that required regulatory approvals are obtained.”
In an April 24th letter to Schoonover, Blockbuster CEO Jim Keyes said “We need to bring closure to this process. If we have not been provided the opportunity to begin due diligence by the close of business on April 28, 2008, we plan to announce that we are withdrawing our proposal to acquire Circuit City in light of your refusal to provide us access despite repeated efforts on our part to satisfy your concerns.”
Schoonover, at least smart enough to know this was his only option, relented.
Said Schoonover, “While the Circuit City board has confidence in the company’s ability to successfully implement its turnaround plan and generate shareholder value, we believe that we can best serve the interests of our shareholders by exploring all possible alternatives to enhance shareholder value. Let me be clear that our decision to allow Blockbuster and Carl Icahn to conduct due diligence should not be taken as an indication that the board has completed its review of the Blockbuster proposal, that the board has taken a position on the company’s value or that it has settled upon a particular strategic course of action.”
Translation? CC is in trouble and a purchase by either Blockbuster or Icahn are the only thing out there now that will save them and shareholders from destruction.
CC has been looking into a sale for quit some time now. Back in March I posted that they had retained Goldman Sachs (GS) as an “adviser” and speculated it was for a sale. It appears it was.
So, should we go buy shares anticipating a sale? No. There is no guarantee that CC management will be reasonable and get a deal done and Icahn, who is smarter than Schoonover in his sleep, will not pay more than he wants for the company.
Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long GS, None
Circuit City Finally Admits it's Failing
Circuit City (CC) CEO Phil “The Shill” Schoonover must be looking at sales numbers for the current quarter.
Schoonover has finally decided to open the books for Blockbuster (BBI) and billionaire Carl Icahn. A new letter to Blockbuster that was given to Circuit City from Icahn states that, “subject to him being satisfied with his due diligence review of Circuit City to be conducted concurrently with Blockbuster, Mr. Icahn and/or entities affiliated with him stand ready to purchase Circuit City if Blockbuster were unable to receive financing or required shareholder approval to do so after satisfactory due diligence, and assuming that required regulatory approvals are obtained.”
In an April 24th letter to Schoonover, Blockbuster CEO Jim Keyes said “We need to bring closure to this process. If we have not been provided the opportunity to begin due diligence by the close of business on April 28, 2008, we plan to announce that we are withdrawing our proposal to acquire Circuit City in light of your refusal to provide us access despite repeated efforts on our part to satisfy your concerns.”
Schoonover, at least smart enough to know this was his only option, relented.
Said Schoonover, “While the Circuit City board has confidence in the company’s ability to successfully implement its turnaround plan and generate shareholder value, we believe that we can best serve the interests of our shareholders by exploring all possible alternatives to enhance shareholder value. Let me be clear that our decision to allow Blockbuster and Carl Icahn to conduct due diligence should not be taken as an indication that the board has completed its review of the Blockbuster proposal, that the board has taken a position on the company’s value or that it has settled upon a particular strategic course of action.”
Translation? CC is in trouble and a purchase by either Blockbuster or Icahn are the only thing out there now that will save them and shareholders from destruction.
CC has been looking into a sale for quit some time now. Back in March I posted that they had retained Goldman Sachs (GS) as an “adviser” and speculated it was for a sale. It appears it was.
So, should we go buy shares anticipating a sale? No. There is no guarantee that CC management will be reasonable and get a deal done and Icahn, who is smarter than Schoonover in his sleep, will not pay more than he wants for the company.
Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long GS, None
AIG: New Math?
Am I the only one who just cannot reconcile this?
AIG (AIG) reported for the 2007 first quarter, AIG reported net income of $4.13 billion or $1.58 per diluted share. First quarter 2008 adjusted net loss, was $3.56 billion or $1.41 per diluted share, compared to adjusted net income of $4.39 billion or $1.68 per diluted share for the first quarter of 2007.
AIG also announced a plan to raise approximately $12.5 billion in capital to fortify its balance sheet and provide increased financial flexibility. The capital is to be raised through a common stock offering and an equity-linked offering for an aggregate of approximately $7.5 billion. At a later date AIG also expects to issue high equity content fixed income securities. These offerings are designed to further strengthen AIG’s significant financial resources and will enhance its ability to grow while maintaining the strength to withstand potential short-term market volatility.
Commenting on first quarter 2008 results, AIG President and Chief Executive Officer Martin J. Sullivan said, “AIG’s results do not reflect the underlying strengths and potential of AIG; rather they reflect the extremely adverse external conditions affecting the spectrum of companies exposed to the U.S. residential housing, credit and capital markets. The sizable unrealized losses and decline in partnership income were among the key drivers impairing our overall net performance. With that said, it is important to underscore that our operating strategies are working well in our core insurance businesses. We believe that our businesses provide an attractive foundation for growth for AIG over the long-term. As part of this effort, we are taking appropriate strategic actions to ensure our businesses are well positioned to capitalize on opportunities provided by the current environment.
“While we anticipated a difficult trading environment, the severity of the unrealized valuation losses and decline in value of our investments were beyond our expectations. Current market conditions also contributed to a significant decline in partnership income compared to a record level in the first quarter of 2007, as well as to declines in mutual fund income. However, the underlying fundamentals of our core businesses remain solid, and several performed quite well in the quarter, despite the challenging environment many faced.”
Now, of course the “underlying fundamentals of the business” are strong. You are an insurer and last I checked the insurance business was still ok. It is your performance in that business that was horrible and does not look to improve soon. Contrast this to Owens Corning’s (OC) results earlier this week that were very good in a industry that is current depressed. Given a choice between the two, I will take the latter.
Here is where it gets weird. Why is AIG announcing a 10% increase in the dividend? Why? This will cost $2.2 billion a year, an increase if $200 million. Not that much, but with a 6.8% dilution of shares coming up due to the offering, that amount will jump to $2.35 billion a year (not including whatever interest will be paid on the new convertible to be issued).
Now, if you need to raise $12 billion (10% of your market cap), you cannot also increase the dividend. How about keeping it and diluting shareholders less? They are going to be paying 6% to 8% on whatever is issued so the additional $200 million a year borrowed will cost another $12 to $16 million a year in interest to shareholders. The stock only yields 2% so it is not like we are talking big bucks for shareholders. Cutting it 10% would have saved $200 million.
This is just a sadly transparent attempt to pacify shareholders into thinking things are much better than the numbers would appear to prove.
Disclosure (“none” means no position):None
Wesco (WSC) Meeting Notes
Charlie Munger, Warren Buffett’s alter ego at Berkshire (BRK.A), is a great talker. Currently I prefer him to Warren if for no other reason Warren is simply overexposed currently and offers nothing new for us when he talks. Munger on the other hand is great and pulls no punches
Shai Dardashti documents the meeting:
Disclosure (“none” means no position):None
Greenspan Talks, No One Listens
After the better part of two years of incorrect predictions and an autopsy of what lead to the current credit environment, and his flaccid defense of his termAlan Greenspan’s statements no longer effect markets……thank god.
In a NY speach Greenspan said that the worst of the credit crunch was over. Now, this simply follows statements from Merrill Lynch’s (MER) John Thain, JP Morgan’s (JPM) Jamie Dimon, Berkshire’s (BRK.A) Warren Buffett and Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson saying the exact same thing.
The difference this time is that back in early 2007 when Greenspan was predicting a recession that has not developed, his words moved the market. Anything at the time out of the former Fed Head’s mouth was run on CNBC and front page news in the papers.
Now thankfully it merits little more than a 200 word article on the web.
It is funny how history judges us based on the results of our actions. Greenspan’s legacy was tarnished when years of virtually free money finally caught up to homeowners and his actions and statements since leaving the Fed have only hurt it more.
Has he just kept quiet after leaving, the current situation would have dissipated and his legacy may have remained in tact. But, by involving himself in it now and in effect hindering the efforts of his successor, Greenspan just may have permanently harm it….
Patriot fans say “everyone does it”. Ok. but if you are so dumb to be the only one to get caught, twice? How about the loyalty Belichik & Crew inspire? They should lose the entire 2009 daft.
It looks like the New England Patriots spied on more of their opponents than previously thought, including the Buffalo Bills.
ESPN.com reports, former Patriots employee Matt Walsh has turned over videos requested by the National Football League.
Those include video showing play-calling signals of five opponents, including the Bills, between 2000 and 2002.
The Patriots were previously fined 750,000 dollars and lost a first round draft choice for taping the New York Jets.
