Categories
Articles

Liveris’s Letter (DOW): A Bright Future

I read Liveris’s letter to shareholders today and have some immediate thoughts..

The press has been reporting Liveris’s compensation at $14.9 million but the reality is that only $1.5 million of that is salary, the rest is stock and loads of options that unless the share price turns around, are useless.

That being said, I actually like the fact he owns over 300,000 shares. It makes him one of the larger non-institutional individual shareholders (by far the largest of management) and does ensure that the decisions he makes today, are for the long term health of the company and by default, its share price.

In the letter, Liveris said “First, you can expect us to continue to run a tight ship. This is still a “no excuses” company, and we will manage our day-to-day business to deliver solid financial results. Dow people throughout the world have proven themselves capable of delivering what it takes to succeed.

Second, we will close on our joint venture with PIC and move forward with implementation of our asset-light strategy.

Third, we will continue transforming our earnings profile. I am committed that by the end of 2008 we will have taken another major step in that regard. If we do not find the right acquisition or acquisitions, we reserve the right to initiate a share buyback.

Either way, my commitment to our stockholders is that at the next industry trough, The Dow Chemical Company will have an earnings profi le that is well north of $3 per share and we will provide steady earnings growth beyond that point.”

What to think?

Liveris has been a straight shooter with shareholders since taking over and has yet to not deliver on a stated goal or objective. He has transformed the earnings profile and the upcoming PIC deal will forever alter the company for the better.

With equity earnings in 2007 over in excess of $1 billion for the first time, these JV’s, located in countries with access to cheap raw materials, will become the driver. The end of 2009 and 2010 will see many of the recent announcements come online that will expand this.

In one deal Dow will rid itself of having its fortunes tied to the highly cyclical commodities business and reap a windfall ($9.5 billion) that, based on to date evidence, will be used to reward shareholders.

Let’s not forget that when Liveris took over Dow was saddled with almost $12 billion in long term debt and was a pure commodity play. He has trimmed that debt load 36%, raised the dividend 25%, nearly doubled the cash from operations and made the aforementioned earnings profile change..

It is worth noting that despite the volatility in the earnings for the commodities side, and the explosion in raw material costs, earnings from the performance business grew 8% and the JV earnings have remained steady.

These two segments are Dow’s future and it is bright.

Now, the stock price……

Berkshire’s (BRK.A) Warren Buffett has always said that “price is what you pay, value is what you get”. It is one of my personal favorites because it reminds us that the price of a stock and what you are getting for that price are not always commensurate. There are times you pay in excess of what you are receiving in value and times you pay far less.

This is one of those times.

I have no idea what the price of Dow’s stock will be in the future. I do know that, buying the stock at its current levels, yielding a growing 4.5% is a wise move long term. With earnings expectations above $3.50 for 2010 (the next expected trough), Dow currently sits at about 10 times those earnings. Should Liveris’s “well north” mean $3.90 a share or higher, then we have a 4.5% yielding company sitting at 8 to 9 times earnings…

All this does not take into account the endless possibilities of $9.5 billion coming into the bank this year….

I will dig through the 10-k this week and see what I can find..

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long Dow

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

What Insiders Bought This Week…


China Security & Surveillance Tech Inc (CSR0 = $3,634,578
MTR Gaming Group Inc (MNTG)=$ 2,429,717
Heritage Crystal Clean Inc (HCCI)= $2,218,488
XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd (XTLB)=$2,172,037
Scientific Games Corp (SGMS)=$ 1,876,000
Enterprise GP Holdings L P (EPE)=$1,749,330
Gentek Inc (GETI)=$1,687,781
Sandridge Energy Inc (SD)=$1,567,427
Omrix Biopharmaceuticals Inc (OMRI)=$1,354,967
Emcore Corp (EMKR)=$1,209,636
Nortel Networks Corp (NT)=$1,024,047
Vail Resorts Inc (MTN)=$1,021,172

Disclosure (“none” means no position):

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

Friday’s Links

Planes, Race, Colleges, Hollywood

– The things we will hear..

– It was a flop

– I think the reality may be just the opposite..

– Can’t they just stop pretending they care at the awards shows? We already know the answer.

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Ackman’s Target Loss, Wow

Another nugget from Leucadia’s (LUK) 10-k. This one has to do with Bill Ackman’s Target (TGT) investment.

As of 12/31, Ackman owned 5.8 million shares and has call options on another 75 million shares. The total cost of the investment was $1.78 billion through Pershing Square IV, L.P.

The net loss on the investment as of 12/31 was $842 million. The loss included interest and dividends received. $135 million of the loss was actually realized, meaning the securities were sold at a loss. The remaining is still being held.

A 47.3% loss…..wow…

Pershing Square IV, L.P. (the “Partnership”) is organized as a limited partnership under the laws of the state of Delaware on May 22, 2007 and commenced operations on June 1, 2007. The objective of the Partnership is to invest all of its assets in Pershing Square IV A, L.P. (the “Subsidiary Partnership”). The Subsidiary Partnership is an exempted limited partnership formed under the limited liability partnership laws of the Cayman Islands on May 31, 2007 and commenced operations on June 1, 2007. The investment objective of the Partnership and the Subsidiary Partnership (collectively, the “PSIV Partnerships”) is to create significant capital appreciation by investing in stock, total return swaps and call options of Target Corporation.

Also,

Pershing, in its sole discretion, may advance or extend the Lock-Up Date for up to one year beyond December 31, 2009 if they believe it is in the best interest of the Partnership to do so.

Disclosure (“none” means no position):None

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

Leucadia Profits From Being Short Mortgages

Sitting here skimming Leucadia’s (LUK)10-K today and can across this.

On Jan. 2, 2007 Leucadia formed HFH SHORTPLUS MASTER FUND, LTD.

It purpose?

“HFH ShortPLUS Master Fund, Ltd. (the “Fund”) is a Cayman Islands exempted company incorporated in accordance with the Companies Law (2004 revision) which commenced operations on January 2, 2007. The Fund’s strategy is to assemble a short-biased portfolio of asset-backed securities (“ABS”) that the Investment Manager believes are most likely to produce high returns during periods of adverse credit performance for residential mortgages, and for mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) and ABS. Returns will come from two principal sources: (i) market value changes arising from changes in credit spreads on the Fund’s short positions; and (ii) credit default payments from counterparties on credit default swaps (“CDS”) or other derivatives.”

Short answer? They bet against mortgages in Jan, 2007.

How did they do?

NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE, BEGINNING OF YEAR= $ 100,000.00
Net investment income = $ 7,873.42
Net realized and unrealized gain = $ 237,056.11
————–
NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE, END OF YEAR= $ 344,929.53
==============

Total return(b) 244.93%

The total investment in the fund was $321.3 million.

At December 31, 2007, 931.50 shares were issued and outstanding.

Disclosure (“none” means no position):None

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

Google and The Analysts

I am loath to write an article about Google (GOOG) for the simple reason it will be one of about 1,000 written today, but I need to do so to make a point about the “analysts”.

My sentiment on Google has been the same for over a year and for those not familiar, here it is.

Everyone is aware of the recent axing of “price targets” for shares of Google recently. For those who are not, here they are below.

27-Mar-08 Stanford Research Reiterated Hold $615 to $500
27-Mar-08 Lehman Brothers Reiterated Overweight $644 to $580
25-Mar-08 UBS Reiterated Buy $590 to $570
20-Mar-08 Jackson Securities Reiterated Buy $815 to $600
20-Mar-08 RBC Capital Mkts Reiterated Outperform $675 to $530
28-Feb-08 Stifel Nicolaus Reiterated Buy $675 to $610
28-Feb-08 Oppenheimer Reiterated Outperform $715 to $600
26-Feb-08 BMO Capital Markets Reiterated Market Perform $690 to $590
01-Feb-08 AmTech Research Reiterated Buy $815 to $785
01-Feb-08 UBS Reiterated Buy $785 to $650
01-Feb-08 Bear Stearns Reiterated Outperform $700 to $650
01-Feb-08 Citigroup Reiterated Buy $775 to $650
01-Feb-08 Oppenheimer Reiterated Outperform $850 to $715
01-Feb-08 Stifel Nicolaus Reiterated Buy $725 to $675
01-Feb-08 RBC Capital Mkts Reiterated Outperform $725 to $675
01-Feb-08 Jefferies & Co Downgraded Buy Hold $725 to $600
01-Feb-08 Lehman Brothers Reiterated Overweight $714 to $644
24-Jan-08 Stanford Research Downgraded Buy Hold $735 to $615

Now, for those who may have forgotten, the recent rush to cut estimates comes only two months after the rush in the opposite direction to raise them. Again, for those who have forgotten, here those “predictions” are.

20-Nov-07 Credit Suisse Reiterated Outperform $800 to $900
06-Nov-07 Bernstein Reiterated Outperform $720 to $850
05-Nov-07 Oppenheimer Reiterated Buy $700 to $850
22-Oct-07 UBS Reiterated Buy $655 to $760
19-Oct-07 AmTech Research Reiterated Buy $685 to $815
19-Oct-07 RBC Capital Mkts Reiterated Outperform $690 to $725
19-Oct-07 BMO Capital Markets Reiterated Market Perform $545 to $690
19-Oct-07 Citigroup Reiterated Buy $600 to $775
19-Oct-07 Cantor Fitzgerald Reiterated Buy $650 to $750
19-Oct-07 Nollenberger Capital Reiterated Buy $650 to $720
16-Oct-07 Needham & Co Reiterated Buy $575 to $690
12-Oct-07 Oppenheimer Reiterated Buy $625 to $700
11-Oct-07 RBC Capital Mkts Reiterated Outperform $560 to $690
11-Oct-07 Stifel Nicolaus Reiterated Buy $620 to $710
11-Oct-07 Stanford Research Reiterated Buy $615 to $735
09-Oct-07 Lehman Brothers Reiterated Overweight $610 to $714
09-Oct-07 Banc of America Sec Reiterated Buy $620 to $670
05-Oct-07 Bear Stearns Reiterated Outperform $550 to $700
05-Oct-07 Nollenberger Capital Reiterated Buy $575 to $650

In the spring and summer of 2007, the urgency to ratchet up the target just was not there and the action was far more benign.

20-Jul-07 Bear Stearns Reiterated Outperform $600 to $550
10-Jul-07 UBS Reiterated Buy $580 to $655
25-Jun-07 JMP Securities Reiterated Mkt Outperform $580 to $625
20-Apr-07 UBS Reiterated Buy $560 to $580
20-Apr-07 Lehman Brothers Reiterated Overweight $560 to $610
20-Apr-07 BMO Capital Markets Reiterated Market Perform $525 to $545
20-Apr-07 Needham & Co Reiterated Buy $537 to $575
20-Apr-07 Banc of America Sec Reiterated Buy $601 to $620
20-Apr-07 Am Tech/JSA Research Reiterated Buy $540 to $600
01-Feb-07 JMP Securities Reiterated Mkt Outperform $525 to $580
01-Feb-07 UBS Reiterated Neutral $535 to $560

So, what is the point? Look close at all the rating. What do they all have in common? The word “reiterated”. Almost without exception (there are a couple) the recommendation of the analyst has not changed. BUT, what they did change was the expectations of the stock price.

Look at UBS. In Feb. 2007 they said it would go to $560, in April they said $580 then in October 2007 they raised that to $760 (it never got that high) and then only two months later they cut it back to $650.

Currently Google’s share price sits at $450. Why does this matter? It is essentially the same price it sat at in Feb. 2007 when UBS made its first call. Now, did Google’s share price rise during the time frame? Yes. But, anyone who invested due to the UBS call in nov. 2007 has lost over 30% since then. As a matter of fact, if you invested after the April, 2007 price call you are underwater.

Another point here is that Google gives no guidance. This means the chasing by the analysts was done by themselves without ANY statement coming from the company that could have influenced them.

Yet, UBS is still saying buy the stock? The same scenario can be said of virtually all the analysts about. Despite the 30% plus drop in shares and the astronomical multiple they commanded despite the company’s size, the sentiment has not changed?

The point here is to totally ignore price targets. The move like a heard and have no correlation to the actual performance of the company or its stock. They chase a stock up or down and inevitably, shareholders get stuck holding a huge bag of losses….

Disclosure (“none” means no position):None

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

18.2% vs 4.8% = Perspective

I am hearing the word “Hooverville” bantered about by the talking heads on TV lately. Now, am I the only one laughing?

Are things perfect currently? No. But can we get just a little perspective here? Let’s look at what the conditions were actually like when the term “Hooverville” was coined.

Robert J. Samuelson, at The Library of Economics and Liberty says:

“It is hard for those who did not live through it to grasp the full force of the worldwide depression. Between 1930 and 1939 U.S. unemployment averaged 18.2 percent. The economy’s output of goods and services (gross national product) declined 30 percent between 1929 and 1933 and recovered to the 1929 level only in 1939. Prices of almost everything (farm products, raw materials, industrial goods, stocks) fell dramatically. Farm prices, for instance, dropped 51 percent from 1929 to 1933. World trade shriveled: between 1929 and 1933 it shrank 65 percent in dollar value and 25 percent in unit volume. Most nations suffered. In 1932 Britain’s unemployment was 17.6 percent”

So where are we at today? Unemployment sits at 4.8%. Lets also note here that this is a full 33% BELOW the 1991-92 unemployment rate of 7.1%, the period of the last actual US recession.

Now, when we look at the “Hooverville” period, we also see a 30% contraction in US GDP. That means we would see a current GDP number of -30.0%!! But, today we see a number calling for an expansion of .6%. Anemic? Yes. Catastrophic? Laughable…

There are several reasons the US will avoid a recession and not remotely approach the “Hooverville” period.

1- The world’s economies as far too intertwined today to allow industrialized nation’s economies to deteriorate that far. Other nations have too much invested in each other to essentially allow another to fail for an extended period. US economic pain is felt in China and vice versa.

2- Demand from developing nations places a floor on production.

3- Money flow: The ease in which investors are able to profit from the economic activities all over the world ensures wealth creation even with deteriorating conditions in their home country. This was not the case in the 1930’s.

4- International businesses: An extended recession in the US would hurt but not cripple profits in virtually all US businesses in the S&P 500. Currently over 50% of the S&P profits are from international operations. While profits as a whole would be damaged in a severe scenario, the evisceration of them we saw during the depression would not happen.

Now, of course a major catastrophic event (nuclear terror, China / Russia military conflict) could cause major disruptions. But, barring that, do not look for them.

Now, will it be all smooth sailing? No.

It does mean that we need a heavy heaping of perspective as to where we sit currently. We have historically low unemployment, an expanding economy and moderate inflation. A far cry from “Hooverville”

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

Friday’s Upgrades and Downgrades


Upgrades
W&T Offshore (WTI)- CapitalOne southcoast Neutral » Add
Arena Resources (ARD)- CapitalOne southcoast Add » Strong Buy
Endo Pharm (ENDP)- Susquehanna Financial Neutral » Positive
Barrick Gold (ABX)- UBS Neutral » Buy
Kinross Gold (KGC)- UBS Neutral » Buy
KLA-Tencor (KLAC)- Friedman Billings Mkt Perform » Outperform
3Com (COMS)- Bernstein Mkt Perform » Outperform
Teradyne (TER)- Friedman Billings Mkt Perform » Outperform
FormFactor (FORM)- Friedman Billings Underperform » Outperform
ASML Holding (ASML)- Friedman Billings Mkt Perform » Outperform
Nabors Ind (NBR)- RBC Capital Mkts Sector Perform » Outperform
Patterson-UTI (PTEN)- RBC Capital Mkts Sector Perform » Outperform
Superior Well Services (SWSI)- RBC Capital Mkts Sector Perform » Outperform
BJ Services (BJS)- RBC Capital Mkts Sector Perform » Outperform
Union Drilling (UDRL)- RBC Capital Mkts Sector Perform » Outperform
Halliburton (HAL)- RBC Capital Mkts Sector Perform » Outperform
Sempra Energy (SRE)- UBS Neutral » Buy
Hartford Financial (HIG)- Bernstein Mkt Perform » Outperform
Allstate (ALL)- Bernstein Mkt Perform » Outperform
Cott (COT)- Lehman Brothers Underweight » Equal-weight
Spirit Aerosystems (SPR)- UBS Neutral » Buy
Valero Energy (VLO)- Deutsche Securities Hold » Buy

Downgrades
Huron Consulting (HURN)- Robert W. Baird Outperform » Neutral
Bank of NY (BK)- Punk, Ziegel & Co Buy » Mkt Perform
Lennox Intl (LII)- Sterne Agee Buy » Hold
Hurco Companies (HURC)- Sterne Agee Buy » Hold
URS (URS)- BMO Capital Markets Outperform » Market Perform
BlackRock (BLK)- Credit Suisse Neutral » Underperform
Sepracor (SEPR)- Susquehanna Financial Neutral » Negative
Oracle (ORCL)- Cross Research Buy » Hold
Watsco (WSO)- BB&T Capital Mkts Buy » Hold
Yamana Gold (AUY)- CIBC Wrld Mkts Sector Outperform » Sector Perform
QLogic (QLGC)- JP Morgan Neutral » Underweight
California Pizza (CPKI)- Friedman Billings Outperform » Mkt Perform
Motorola (MOT)- Banc of America Sec Buy » Neutral
Seagate Tech (STX)- Robert W. Baird Outperform » Neutral

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

Sears Holdings Shareholder Meeting Info.

Here it is. This years shareholder meeting details for Sears Holdings (SHLD)

Dear Stockholder:

I am pleased to invite you to attend the annual meeting of stockholders of Sears Holdings Corporation (the “Company” or “Sears Holdings”) on Monday, May 5, 2008. The meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. (Central time) in the Sears Holdings General Session Room, 3333 Beverly Road, Hoffman Estates, Illinois.

The notice of Annual Meeting and proxy statement that follow this letter describe the matters to be voted on during the meeting. Your proxy card and the Company’s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K also are enclosed.

Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting in person, please read the proxy statement and vote your shares. Instructions for Internet and telephone voting are attached to your proxy card. If you prefer, you can vote by mail by completing your proxy card and returning it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope.

If you plan to attend the meeting:

If you are a stockholder of record and you plan to attend the meeting, please keep the admission ticket that is attached to the enclosed proxy card, as you must present this ticket to be admitted to the meeting. Each stockholder may be asked to present valid picture identification, such as a driver’s license or passport. Stockholders holding shares in brokerage accounts (“street-name stockholders”) will need to bring a copy of a brokerage statement, proxy or letter from the broker confirming ownership of Sears Holdings shares as of the record date of March 10, 2008. Registration will begin at 8:30 a.m. and seating will begin at 8:45 a.m. Cameras, recording devices and other electronic devices will not be permitted at the meeting.

Sincerely,

W. Bruce Johnson

An interesting note from the proxy. Directors and Senior Execs own 55.3% of the company.

There were 132,356,535 shares of common stock outstanding as of February 2, 2008

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long SHLD

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

Cramer Talks of Buying Bear STOCK

This is just hours before he later denied making the famous “keep our money in Bear Stern (BSC)” comment, that he now says was not an endorsement of the stock.

In this video, he clearly pushed the STOCK.. At least TheStreet.com has not taken this one down yet…

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

"Fast Money" for Friday


Friday’s Picks
Jeff Macke likes World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE) $18.25

Tim Seymour prefers ConocoPhillips (COP) $75.73 because they own 20% of Russia’s Lukoil.

Karen Finerman recommends Altria (MO) $73.22

Pete Najarian thinks Burger King (BKC) $27.52 is a buy.

Thursday’s Results
Tim Seymour likes Cosan Limited (CZZ) $12.34 as the largest ethanol producer in Latin America. Close $11.97 LOSS

Karen Finerman prefers Kaiser Aluminum (KALU) $69.71 Close $69.20 LOSS

Pete Najarian recommends buying puts on the Oil Services HLDRS (OIH) $176.44 Close $175.25 GAIN

Jeff Macke says he likes Home Depot (HD) $28.16 out of spite, because it didn’t advance in the Fast Money Madness tournament. Close $27.86 LOSS

2008 Records:
Brian Schaeffer= 0-1
Carter Worth= 0-1
Jon Najarian= 4-1
Jeff Macke= 21-16
Tim Seymore= 14-7
Guy Adami= 20-21
Pete Najarian= 22-18
Karen Finerman= 16-22-1
Joe Terrenova= 1-1

2007 Results (Since 6/21):
Guy Adami= 58-46 = 56%
Jeff Macke= 60-40 = 60%
Pete Najarian= 49-41 = 54%

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

Archer Daniels’ Suit Ought to Give Railroads Pause…

Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) has filed a price-fixing lawsuit against the 5 major railroads. This could snowball….

The lawsuit filed Tuesday in federal court in Minneapolis names Union Pacific (UNP), BNSF (BNI), CSX (CSX), Norfolk Southern (NSC), and Kansas City Southern (KSU) as the conspirators. It accuses the five railroads of setting fuel surcharges by working through the Association of American Railroads, which publishes the indices used by railroads to calculate rates. AAR’s board includes the CEOs from the five railroads, according to the lawsuit.

ADM accuses UP and BNSF of agreeing to tie their surcharges to the same fuel price index, and to impose changes in the surcharge on the same day. While UP and BNSF locked their surcharges together in the territory they dominate, the Western U.S., ADM claims CSX, Norfolk Southern and Kansas City Southern did the same thing in the East.

The effect is that the railroads’ fuel surcharges moved in unison, the lawsuit alleges.

Most railroads hedge their fuel purchases. This ought to means that actual fuel spending should vary from one railroad to the next. If that is true, the fuel surcharges should have also varied, but they did not. In January 2007 the Federal Surface Transportation Board said railroads must link surcharges to their actual fuel costs.

ADM claims uniform pricing “could not have happened by chance or coincidence.”

The railroads of course denied the charges saying they “have no merit” and that they would “vigorously defend them”.

ADM says it alone has paid more than $250 million in fuel surcharges since 2003.

Here is where this could get sticky for the railroads. While ADM is a major rail shipper, there are thousands of smaller shippers looking for ways to reduce or recoup transportation costs. If there is any light at the end of this tunnel as the litigation moves forward, expect a flood of lawsuits to follow. The suits may follow anyway to force a settlement.

What we will then end up with is a major class action suit against the railroads. In that instance the sums the railroads will be looking at will be in the billions of dollars (both in refunds and punitive damages). Considering the 5 railroads only made almost $7 billion between them last year, the outcome could seriously damage the industry.

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long ADM, None

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

Now Micheal Lewis Calls Out Cramer

When it is no longer just us bloggers but the MSM calling you out, the end of the run is near…

Micheal Lewis writes on Bloomberg.

“Three days earlier, on theStreet.com, Jim Cramer listed Bear Stearns common stock as a “buy” at $62. On his CNBC program that day, he showed his viewers a chart of Bear Stearns stock price and hollered, “Bear Stearns is fine! Do not take your money out of Bear.” Over that weekend — days when the markets were closed and there was no material news about the company — Bear Stearns was believed to be worth $2 a share, so long as the Federal Reserve assumed the downside risk of almost $30 billion of its mortgage securities…

TheStreet.com quickly removed Cramer’s March 11 “buy” recommendation from its page devoted to Bear Stearns. (The Cramer-obsessed Don Harrold’s YouTube account of all this is priceless.) And Cramer went back on CNBC to explain that he never intended for anyone to go and actually BUY shares in Bear Stearns — only that, if they happen to bank with Bear Stearns, they shouldn’t worry about losing their money (a public service to all those “Mad Money” viewers who use Bear Stearns as a bank.)”

This is a tough one for Cramer if for no other reason the actions of Thestreet.com altering its website.

If he had just been honest (he may not be able to), this would have blown over already.

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

Where is the Recession?

When did the definition of a recession change from “two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth” to “not as much growth as we want”?

Everyday day I sit here and read and hear folks pontificate about the US “currently being in recession”. Yet, when one looks at the numbers, not only we not “currently in a recession”, we are not even approaching one.

It has been almost two decades since the last true recession in the US. I know we experienced slowdowns in the mid 1990’s and early 2001-2002 but if we are being honest, those were just simply bumps in the road. In Q4 1990, GDP fell 3% and Q1 1991 followed with a 2% drop from there. We have not had consecutive negative quarterly growth since then. In short, we are spoiled. Prior to the 1990-1991 recession, people had only go back 9 years in their memories to remember the last one. We are currently approaching year 19 which means there are a whole class of investors who have never actually experienced a recession in their investing lives…

So, where are we now?

Gross domestic product rose at an unrevised 0.6% annual rate October through December, the Commerce Department reported today, in line with expectations. For the current quarter ending Monday, economists expect growth to be flat. For Q2, economists expect GDP to fall 1%.

For all of 2007, the US economy grew at the weakest pace in five years, rising at an inflation-adjusted 2.2% rate compared to 2.9% in 2006.

The Labor Department reported that initial claims for jobless benefits fell 9,000 last week but remained at elevated levels. Also, the previous week’s level was revised down by 3,000. The unemployment rate remains at historically low levels.

Inflation, (consumer prices) was revised down to a 3.9% annual rate in the quarter from 4.1% previously reported. Core prices, which exclude food and energy costs, rose at a 2.5% pace, again revised down from 2.7%

None of those numbers, NONE, are recessionary.

Expectations of both business and economists are for the “economy to turn around” in the second half of 2008. So, if this is true, and we have flat growth in the current quarter, we are now running out of time to have a recession.

In fact, the “recession we are in but not entered into yet according to actual data” will most likely never materialize. Confusing?

Remember back in the late 1990’s when people began redefining earnings and were using EBITDA instead the actual EPS? It was as if they wanted us to believe taxes and interest on debt no longer mattered. When people start to redefine metrics, they are doing so to make the current situation fit the outlook they want us to see.

This means when you read or hear people lamenting the recession we are in “due to housing”, you would do best to ignore them. Housing is a significant part but not the total of the economy. They are trying to redefine what a recession actually is.

We are facing “slowing growth” not “negative”. Until we get a single quarter of negative GDP growth, ANY talk of recession is just that, talk.

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

Thursday’s Links

Reality TV, Interest rates, Borders, Tips

– I never Tivo the right shows…

And we thought 6% was “too high”?

– The Master’s jump on the Borders Bandwagon

– Wow…. that is all I can say

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books