Categories
Articles

Reader Emails Answered: Oil, Financials, Recession, Dollar etc..

Been getting a slew of emails the last months and rather than say the same things over and over, thought I would address them in a post since the themes are all similar..

Wall St. Newsletters

1- Financials:
Will not be touching them and are currently waiting for Wells Fargo (WFC) to rally a bit to sell out of it. Why? I no longer know the rules of investing in them. TARP and its requirements change almost daily. Going forward, the term (interest) the Gov’t demands and the shareholder dilution that accompanies them will become more onerous. That is bad news. Also, the second body blow from housing is due this year and next. That means more suffering for financials and shareholders.

Now, this does not mean I will never invest in them again, just that I think in 2010 we will still be able to buy them at these levels or lower. Is there value in financials? I just cannot quantify it as long as we have shifting rules from the Gov’t.

2- The Market
Up to 9000, then back to 8000 all year. The market will bounce like a ball but never really go anywhere. I think the risk is to the downside as the recession worsens. Unemployment ought to pass 10%, GDP will be negative for the year and credit is still drying up. So, given those, how do we go to 10,000?

That being said, it is a traders market. If you sell options you can make some money here. If you trade the rang you can also. If you are not a trader, don’t try to be one. Be who you are

3- Oil
Have written a lot about it recently. Why? Demand has fallen true, but the unreported story is production has fallen off a cliff also. Oil is not like a faucet. It cannot just be turned back on. A drilling project shuttered because of low prices today cannot just be flipped back on when prices recover. There is a tremendous lag. As crazy as prices were at $147, they are equally as crazy at $47. US production continues to fall, Mexico’s has plummeted and OPEC is more in power than ever. That only serve to heighten the Geo-Political risk of oil. Translation? One wacko can cause a global oil price spike.

I see the most value here now, or at least a market unfettered by arbitrary Gov’t intervention. Yes, I know that most foreign oil companies are govt’t owned, what I am saying is that if you buy oil today, your ownership cannot be diluted by the gov’t like it can and is in equities today.

4- The dollar and inflation….
Has anyone ever seen a scenario when massive supply of an item has not caused a devaluation of it? How can the current US Gov’t’s “running the dollar printing presses full tilt” like they are now NOT lead to a devaluation of the dollar? Here is the problem. The gov’t WANTS inflation to return. It will increase home prices, increase to prices manufacturers get for their goods, increase equity values etc. The problem is, gov’t always overdoes it. That means that they will pump too much into the system and inflation will get away from them.

That genie, once out of the bottle is only pot back in by inflicting more pain on the economy. It then becomes a vicious circle…

5- What to buy?
Right now? I am buying nothing but oil. Why? As much as we have sen the rules of the game change in the past year, still more is due. TARP requirements are, the tax code is, a stimulus is coming (we do not know the composition of it) and a Democratic Congress has plenty on its agenda. What looks good today may not tomorrow. Does this mean you should not buy anything? No. There of course will be plenty of equities that do wonderful in the next year. I just think there will be plenty more that do not.

Management now matters more than ever. Keep it in mind when buying.

Am I selling? Only the financials (sold most in the fall). I still like what I hold, Dow Chemical (DOW), AutoNation (AN), ADM (ADM), Borders (BGP), Oil (DXO), (DBO), Phillip Morris International (PM), Sears Holdings (SHLD) and GE (GE). I do have misgiving about Immelt at GE but am willing to wait as I think they will be a big beneficiary of infrastructure stimulus.

All dominate their businesses (except Borders and Sears, they are plays on the majority shareholders Ackman and Lampert) and are picking up market share. Dow will lead us out of recession as whatever needs to be made, they make the stuff that makes it and it yields 10%.

Wait and see….

This is the environment that one can make purchases that make one look like a genius for decades, it just takes a keen eye….


Disclosure (“none” means no position):
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Bill Gates Continues Buying AutoNation Shares $$

It’s been a few weeks since the last purchase of AutoNation (AN) shares for Gates’ Cascade Investments and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Wall St. Newsletters

On 1/7 Bill Gates, through his Foundation a and Cascade Investments each added another 50,000 shares of the auto retailer.

Total holdings now come to 21.7 million shares or 12.2% of the total.


Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long AN
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Monday’s links

Curve, Inflation, Shiller on housing, Lampert

Wall St. Newsletters

– A New one

– It’s coming

– Interested in H&R Block?

Disclosure (“none” means no position):
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

60 Minutes on Oil…Did Anyone Actually Do Any Checking? $$

So, 60 minutes did a piece on oil last night and, well, oops..


Wall St. Newsletters

First here is the piece.

For those who do not want to watch it here are the crib notes. A Wall St. cabal controls oil markets that Enron set up to manipulate prices. There is a little more but not much…

Let’s look at some of the claims…

Production: Here is the EIA world oil production chart:

For those who want it, here is the link

One thing you’ll notice, production, unlike the claims of the piece, did indeed fall. In fact, as price rose during 2007, both US, Persian gulf and worldwide oil production was below 2006 levels. As the super spike began in 2008, the Pershing Gulf region increased production roughly 10% to capture the high prices. What is alarming is that US production again fell (could not capture high prices) and worldwide production gained only 6%.

Let’s look at demand: (million of barrel per day world demand)

2004 – 82.41

2005 – 83.82

2006 – 84.95

2007

Q1- 85.84

Q2- 84.88

Q3- 85.54

Q4- 86.94

2008

Q1- 86.07

Q2- 85.27

Again, here is the link

So, despite what the 60 Minutes piece said, world demand for oil waned only slightly during the spike period and production was only then ramping up. Let’s not forget, in Q2 2007 demand fell only to accelerate again to record highs 6 months later.

What happened after? Demand destruction. The global recession we are entering eviscerated demand and with the recent increase in production, the price that peaked in July 2007, collapsed. The problem is production has also, but that is a story for the next oil spike.

What did the EIA say in June 2008?

Here is how the EIA modeled oil prices based on “fundamentals”, again in June 2008.

Now, was oil priced correctly at $147 a barrel in July 2008? No. There was some speculative excess but to suggest that what happen in 2007-2008 was “speculators” lacks in any basis of fact. Is oil priced correctly at $40 a barrel today? No. Far too low. Good, I’m buying…

For 60 Minutes to imply that supply /demand had very little to do with the oil price increases in 2007 and early 2008 is counter to what the EIA was saying. It does make a nice little story to blame it all the villain of the day, Wall St. and to bring back to ghost or Enron, but it is still shoddy work on their part. Now, it isn’t as bad as forging documents to try to steal a Presidential Election, but is is just as dishonest..

Here is the most recent outlook from the EIA (12/9/2008)



Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long oil through DXO, DBO

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Holy Cow…..

Some weekend non-investment entertainment..Carrie Underwood at the PCA’s…..WOW…..

Wall St. Newsletters


Disclosure (“none” means no position):
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Jim Cramer Rally Monkey

t plenty of requests so here it is…Have g

Wall St. Newsletters


Disclosure (“none” means no position):
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Ackman and Pershing Square Dump Barnes and Noble Shares

Wall St. Newsletters

Ackman who as of the 11/20 filing held over 6.4 million shares has sold out of his Barnes and Noble (BKS) position.

Todays’s filing SEC Link.


Disclosure (“none” means no position):
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

A Reader’s Take on Management

This reader has a great point on Berkowitz and Buffett…

Wall St. Newsletters

From a Reader…

Kiplinger asks what went wrong at Dodge&Cox. Why did Fairholme (FAIRX) sidestep the mess at AIG (AIG) and some others? Pabrai has discussed Berkowitz as a manager that places great importance on the financials, but also importantly on the management skills.

I sold my AIG in the mid-$30’s because I gradually became aware of Martin Sullivan’s shutting off the credit risk reviews as unimportant to the business while I knew that Greenberg was on top of risks daily. Managers who simply review the #’s missed this change in risk monitoring including Davis even though Davis in particular felt that they had special insights to their companies.

In my view there is no such thing as a “Moat” often touted by value managers because of your market position. Many have taken up the “Moat” banner, i.e. Morningstar with a “Moat” rating.

AIG is a clear example of a company’s management style causing the companies virtual extinction. The only “Moat” a company has vs. competitors is a qualified management and culture. Lose this and the company can lose everything. Investment managers who do not understand this will have markets in which their shallow, numbers only methodology will fail to protect their clients.

Berkowitz and Berkshire’s (BRK.A) Buffet have the learned to distinguish between good and bad management as well as calculate buy and sell valuations.

The Kiplinger question has missed the “management quality” just like 99.98% of investors. We do not teach “How to identify good management?” Most people simply look at the historical financials and assume a new manager’s record will continue in the same direction. NOT NECESSARIALY!!!!

Berkowitz looks more deeply than any other mutual fund manager I know and it shows in his results.

Here is the Kiplinger Piece.


Disclosure (“none” means no position):None
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Marty Whitman Profiled

This is a pretty cool video…

Wall St. Newsletters


Disclosure (“none” means no position):
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Sovereign Wealth Funds: "Santiago Principles"

Here are the GAPP guidelines Sovereign Wealth Funds from 23 nations have agreed to adhere to, called the “Santiago Principles”.

Wall St. Newsletters

Sovereign Wealth Funds: “Santiago Principles”

Publish at Scribd or explore others: Globalization Business investing swf


Disclosure (“none” means no position):
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Watch Wal-Mart’s Growth

This is one of the coolest things I have seen. Watch Wal-Mart (WMT) grow.

Wall St. Newsletters


Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long WMT
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Simmons & Co. on China’s Energy Needs

A must read…..there is huge value in energy right now

Wall St. Newsletters

Simmons on China Energy

Publish at Scribd or explore others: Trade and Commerce Business matthew simmons crude oil


Disclosure (“none” means no position):
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Friday’s Links

Berkowitz, Coulter, Oil, Do a Good Deed,

Wall St. Newsletters

– “Prices are as attractive as I have ever seen

– Sorry but Ann is funny…

Watch CBS Videos Online

– You must read Gregor

– Help out


Disclosure (“none” means no position):
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Quote of the day

Wall St. Newsletters

“There was certainly no pay-to-play involved, because I don’t have no money,”
Roland Burris on his Senate nomination (WSJ Page 1 article)

hmmm…interesting logic. Also, can’t he at least use proper english? Seems like he will fit in well with everyone else in the Senate.


Disclosure (“none” means no position):
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Sovereign Wealth Funds: "We’ll Invest At Home Thank You"

This is a follow up to previous interviews… View them here and here

Wall St. Newsletters

We have gone from trying to push them away in Q1, to begging for their money in Q2, to them just ignoring the rest of the world on Q3. Funny how events unfold…

Q3 Highlights:
Monitor Group Research Reveals Sovereign Wealth Funds

Alter Investment Strategies during Worsening Global Financial Crisis, Funds Focus on Joint Ventures and Home Market Investments

Cambridge, Mass. – December 17 – In Q3 of 2008, as the global financial crisis continued to worsen, SWFs sought to limit their exposure to the riskiness of OECD markets. At the same time these funds sought to put more capital to work in their domestic economies which were becoming increasingly strained. These developments are highlighted by Monitor Group, one of the world’s leading advisory and consulting firms in its July-September 2008 quarterly analysis of global SWF investments.

The latest Monitor Group analysis is a quarterly update to its June 2008 report: “Assessing the Risks: The Behaviors of Sovereign Wealth Funds in the Global Economy.” Key findings of the latest analysis include:

§ SWF recent behavior shows a marked shift toward domestic and emerging markets deals. 46 percent of reported deals in Q3 were domestic transactions, the highest percentage since 2003. Also, 54 percent of Q2 and Q3 deals by value ($23 billion out of $42 billion) were in emerging markets, the highest share of total deal value since 2005
§ Investment in OECD countries has declined sharply during 2008, from $37 billion in Q1 to $9 billion in Q2 and $8 billion in Q3. In Q3, North American targets were involved in 7 SWF deals totaling $2.4 billion. In contrast, there were 7 North American deals totaling $23 billion during Q1 2008.
§ Investment in financial sector targets has fallen off significantly since Q1; real estate investment, which spiked up in Q2, also dropped sharply in Q3. Financials comprised $43.4 billion of deal value in Q1, compared to $4 billion each in Q2 and Q3. Real Estate deals were $3.2 billion in Q3 (16 percent of the total), compared to $13.7 billion (52 percent) in Q2 2008.
§ SWFs from the MENA region were the most active in Q3, carrying out some 90 percent of the deals by value. Asian SWFs were much less active in Q3 2008 than in previous quarters.
§ In Q3, funds in the Monitor SWF Transaction Database executed 46 deals totaling $15.4 billion. This is a decline from $58.3 billion in Q1, and $26.5 billion in Q2, although the total number of deals per quarter was similar in all three quarters.

I spoke to Drosten Fisher today, a principal with the international strategy consultancy Monitor Group. His focus is serving government and commercial clients in the areas of economic competitiveness, national security and international finance. A Middle East specialist, he speaks Arabic and has lived and worked in the region. He is a co-author of a recent Monitor report into sovereign wealth fund investment and is a regular speaker and commentator on Middle Eastern investment, politics and business. Educated at Oxford, LSE, and Georgetown, Drosten is a member of the Arab Bankers Association of North America.

He feels that SWF’s are going to be very selective going forward, especially in the financial services area when investing. Domestic pressures, both from the fall of oil and the falling trades surpluses are forcing SWF’s to focus internally in their investment choices. This paradigm does not show any reversal until the global economy, especially the US (#1 trade partner) improves. Further, continued weakness in oil prices will depress foreign investment from SWF’s indefinitely.

Here is the Full Report:
Monitor Group SWF Q3 Report

Publish at Scribd or explore others: Money/Wealth Business investment monitor group


Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books