Categories
Articles

Wednesday’s Upgrades and Downgrades


Upgrades
First Horizon (FHN)- Fox Pitt In Line » Outperform
Wal-Mart (WMT)- Morgan Keegan Mkt Perform » Outperform
Barrick Gold (ABX)- CIBC Wrld Mkts Sector Perform » Sector Outperform
Randgold Resources (GOLD)- HSBC Securities Neutral » Overweight
Scotiabank (BNS)- RBC Capital Mkts Underperform » Sector Perform

Downgrades
Littelfuse (LFUS)- William Blair Outperform » Mkt Perform
Brookfield Asset Mngmt (BAM)- BMO Capital Markets Market Perform » Underperform
AU Optronics (AUO)- Credit Suisse Outperform » Neutral
Abiomed (ABMD)- Susquehanna Financial Positive » Neutral
CIBC (CM)- RBC Capital Mkts Sector Perform » Underperform
Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD)- RBC Capital Mkts Outperform » Sector Perform
Abercrombie (ANF)- Friedman Billings Outperform » Mkt Perform
Linear Tech (LLTC)- UBS Buy » Neutral
CSX Corp (CSX)- UBS Buy » Neutral
China Unicom (CHU)- Credit Suisse Outperform » Neutral

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Wednesday's Upgrades and Downgrades


Upgrades
First Horizon (FHN)- Fox Pitt In Line » Outperform
Wal-Mart (WMT)- Morgan Keegan Mkt Perform » Outperform
Barrick Gold (ABX)- CIBC Wrld Mkts Sector Perform » Sector Outperform
Randgold Resources (GOLD)- HSBC Securities Neutral » Overweight
Scotiabank (BNS)- RBC Capital Mkts Underperform » Sector Perform

Downgrades
Littelfuse (LFUS)- William Blair Outperform » Mkt Perform
Brookfield Asset Mngmt (BAM)- BMO Capital Markets Market Perform » Underperform
AU Optronics (AUO)- Credit Suisse Outperform » Neutral
Abiomed (ABMD)- Susquehanna Financial Positive » Neutral
CIBC (CM)- RBC Capital Mkts Sector Perform » Underperform
Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD)- RBC Capital Mkts Outperform » Sector Perform
Abercrombie (ANF)- Friedman Billings Outperform » Mkt Perform
Linear Tech (LLTC)- UBS Buy » Neutral
CSX Corp (CSX)- UBS Buy » Neutral
China Unicom (CHU)- Credit Suisse Outperform » Neutral

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Biglari Buys More Steak n’ Shake (SNS)

In two separate transactions, Sardar Biglari, through his Lion Fund investment vehicle purchased an additional 36,100 shares of Steak n’ Shake (SNS) at prices of $6.62 and $6.42.

The Lion Fund now holds 977,200 shares directly and 1,553,545 shares through Biglari’s Western Acquisitions vehicle.

Disclosure (“none” means no position):None

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Biglari Buys More Steak n' Shake (SNS)

In two separate transactions, Sardar Biglari, through his Lion Fund investment vehicle purchased an additional 36,100 shares of Steak n’ Shake (SNS) at prices of $6.62 and $6.42.

The Lion Fund now holds 977,200 shares directly and 1,553,545 shares through Biglari’s Western Acquisitions vehicle.

Disclosure (“none” means no position):None

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Just Disturbing…….

Nothing to do with investing just possibly the oddest story I have ever seen…..

Disturbing…..

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

"Fast Money" for Wednesday


WEDNESDAY’S PICKS
For the second day in a row Jeff Macke recommends shorting the Dow by getting long the Short Dow30 ProShares (DOG) $62.6

Guy Adami suggests getting long Celgene (CELG) $61.31

Karen Finerman thinks Aetna (AET) $45.65 is a buy.

Pete Najarian prefers Norfolk Southern (NSC) $65.5 on the pullback.

TUESDAY’S RESULTS
Jeff Macke recommends shorting the Dow by getting long the Short Dow30 ProShares (DOG) $62.21 CLOSE $62.47 GAIN

Guy Adami thinks Celgene (CELG) $61.20 looks interesting. CLOSE $61.31 GAIN

Jon Najarian is bullish on National Semiconductor (NSM) $20.82 CLOSE $21.66 GAIN

Karen Finerman recommends Bon-Ton (BONT) $6.76 as a high risk trade. CLOSE $6.80 GAIN

2008 Records:
Brian Schaeffer= 0-1
Carter Worth= 1-1
Jon Najarian= 4-3
Jeff Macke= 42-36-1
Tim Seymore= 17-14
Guy Adami= 46-36
Pete Najarian= 42-37
Karen Finerman= 40-32-1
Joe Terrenova= 1-3

2007 Results (Since 6/21):
Guy Adami= 58-46 = 56%
Jeff Macke= 60-40 = 60%
Pete Najarian= 49-41 = 54%

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Dow Chemical in Possible Kuwait, Sinopec JV

It looks as though the relationship between Dow Chemical and Kuwait is going to expand further.

It was reported today Kuwait Petroleum Corp (KPC) is considering Royal Dutch Shell (RDS.A) and Dow Chemical (DOW) as possible partners in a 250,000-300,000 bpd refinery planned as a joint venture with Sinopec in Guangdong.

Sinopec (SHI) will hold about 50-51% stake of the Nansha refinery to be located in Southern China. The refinery will include a petrochemical plant with annual ethylene output of 1 mln tons.

KPC awaits final approval from China’s main economic planning agency- National Development and Reform Commission and from the environment ministry. State-owned KPC and Sinopec, Asia’s top refiner, received preliminary government approval for the Guangdong plant in 2006.

This one is simple, gaining access to the one of the world’s largest and fastest growing economy’s and deepening a partnership with Kuwait really has virtually no downside.

It does look as though Dow is becoming the “partner of choice” for these nations looking to expand their petrochemical complexes.

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long DOW, None

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Lehman’s Callahan Now On The Hot Seat

Looks like Einhorn was correct……despite Lehman’s (LEH) proclamations to the contrary.

Lehman has raised $6 billion in capital in the past year, including $4 billion last quarter. It is now looking at the need to raise another $3 to $4 billion.

CFO Erin Callahan has been the public face of the company during the crisis and has made statements that will now come back to haunt her. The firm is saddled with billions of dollars of illiquid commercial real-estate assets and leveraged loans and is expected to face further write-downs on these portfolios.

The Wall St Journal reported today
“During the second quarter, Lehman was stung by hedges used to offset losses in real estate and other securities, according to people familiar with the matter. The firm bet that indexes tracking markets such as real-estate securities and leveraged loans would fall. If that happened, it would book profits that would make up some of its losses from holding these securities and loans.

However, in an unexpected twist, some of the indexes rose, even as the assets they were supposed to hedge against continued to lose value or stayed relatively flat. Lehman’s losses from both write-downs on assets and ineffective hedges will likely top $2 billion, people familiar with the matter said.”

Just over a month ago Callahan was on CNBC and said at the time they did not expect to need the last fund-raising they did.

Now additional funds and further shareholder dilution are being needed. Someone will pay and you cannot just sit back anymore and blame short-sellers “spreading rumors”. When what you alleged to be “rumor” starts coming true, it now looks as though you are the not being totally honest.

Watch Einhorn express his concern about the company. Bartiromo tries to refute Einhorn but he makes his point nontheless. Who is looking more accurate?

I think it may not be too long before Callahan joins the latest list of casualties.

Disclosure (“none” means no position):None

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Lehman's Callahan Now On The Hot Seat

Looks like Einhorn was correct……despite Lehman’s (LEH) proclamations to the contrary.

Lehman has raised $6 billion in capital in the past year, including $4 billion last quarter. It is now looking at the need to raise another $3 to $4 billion.

CFO Erin Callahan has been the public face of the company during the crisis and has made statements that will now come back to haunt her. The firm is saddled with billions of dollars of illiquid commercial real-estate assets and leveraged loans and is expected to face further write-downs on these portfolios.

The Wall St Journal reported today
“During the second quarter, Lehman was stung by hedges used to offset losses in real estate and other securities, according to people familiar with the matter. The firm bet that indexes tracking markets such as real-estate securities and leveraged loans would fall. If that happened, it would book profits that would make up some of its losses from holding these securities and loans.

However, in an unexpected twist, some of the indexes rose, even as the assets they were supposed to hedge against continued to lose value or stayed relatively flat. Lehman’s losses from both write-downs on assets and ineffective hedges will likely top $2 billion, people familiar with the matter said.”

Just over a month ago Callahan was on CNBC and said at the time they did not expect to need the last fund-raising they did.

Now additional funds and further shareholder dilution are being needed. Someone will pay and you cannot just sit back anymore and blame short-sellers “spreading rumors”. When what you alleged to be “rumor” starts coming true, it now looks as though you are the not being totally honest.

Watch Einhorn express his concern about the company. Bartiromo tries to refute Einhorn but he makes his point nontheless. Who is looking more accurate?

I think it may not be too long before Callahan joins the latest list of casualties.

Disclosure (“none” means no position):None

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Bernanke on the Economy & The Dollar

Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke commented on the economy today.

Outlook:
“Broadly speaking, the functioning of financial markets has improved of late, but conditions remain strained and some key funding and securitization markets have shown only tentative signs of recovery. Some borrowers, such as highly-rated corporations, retain good access to credit, but credit conditions generally remain restrictive in areas related to residential or commercial real estate.

Residential construction continues to contract, and the overhang of unsold new homes remains large, although it has declined some in absolute terms. Consumer spending has thus far held up a bit better than expected, but households continue to face significant headwinds, including falling house prices, a softer job market, tighter credit, and higher energy prices, and consumer sentiment has declined sharply since the fall. Businesses are also facing challenges, including rapidly escalating costs of raw materials and weaker domestic demand. However, the strength of foreign demand for U.S. goods and services has offset, to some extent, the slowing of domestic sales.

Overall economic growth was quite slow but apparently positive in both the fourth quarter of 2007 and the first quarter of this year. Activity during the current quarter is also likely to be relatively weak. We may see somewhat better economic conditions during the second half of 2008, reflecting the effects of monetary and fiscal stimulus, reduced drag from residential construction, further progress in the repair of financial and credit markets, and still solid demand from abroad. This baseline forecast is consistent with our recently released projections, which also see growth picking up further in 2009. However, until the housing market, and particularly house prices, shows clearer signs of stabilization, growth risks will remain to the downside. Recent increases in oil prices pose additional downside risks to growth.

Inflation has remained high, largely reflecting continued sharp increases in the prices of globally traded commodities. Thus far, the pass-through of high raw materials costs to domestic labor costs and the prices of most other products has been limited, in part because of softening domestic demand. However, the continuation of this pattern is not guaranteed and will bear close attention. Futures markets continue to predict–albeit with a great range of uncertainty–that commodity prices will level out, a forecast consistent with our expectation of some overall slowing in the global economy and thus in the demand for raw materials. A rough stabilization of commodity prices, even at high levels, would result in a relatively rapid moderation of inflation, consistent with the projections of Federal Reserve governors and Reserve Bank presidents for 2009 and 2010. Unfortunately, the prices of a number of commodities, most notably oil, have continued upward recently, even as expectations of future policy rates and the foreign exchange value of the dollar have remained generally stable in the past few months. The possibility that commodity prices will continue to rise is an important risk to the inflation forecast. Another significant upside risk to inflation is that high headline inflation, if sustained, might lead the public to expect higher long-term inflation rates, an expectation that could ultimately become self-confirming.”

Perhaps the most important paragraph was the third from the end:

“In collaboration with our colleagues at the Treasury, we continue to carefully monitor developments in foreign exchange markets. The challenges that our economy has faced over the past year or so have generated some downward pressures on the foreign exchange value of the dollar, which have contributed to the unwelcome rise in import prices and consumer price inflation. We are attentive to the implications of changes in the value of the dollar for inflation and inflation expectations and will continue to formulate policy to guard against risks to both parts of our dual mandate, including the risk of an erosion in longer-term inflation expectations. Over time, the Federal Reserve’s commitment to both price stability and maximum sustainable employment and the underlying strengths of the U.S. economy–including flexible markets and robust innovation and productivity–will be key factors ensuring that the dollar remains a strong and stable currency.”

This is the most that has been said on the dollar since Bernanke has taken office. For those of us who feel oil prices would come down substantially should the dollar strengthen, it is good news. It mean Ben will begin to focus on that as a monetary tool rather than simple rate adjustments.


Read the full transcript here
:

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Latest Fed Auction Shows Rising Rates

This mark the most dramatic rate increase to date.

The current auction went off .16% higher than the last

On June 2, 2008, the Federal Reserve conducted an auction of $75 billion in 28-day credit through its Term Auction Facility. Following are the results of the auction:

Stop-out rate: 2.26 percent

Total propositions submitted: $95.914 billion
Total propositions accepted: $75.000 billion
Bid/cover ratio: 1.28

Number of bidders: 73

Bids at the stop-out rate were prorated at 48.47% and resulting awards were rounded to the nearest $10,000 (except that all awards below $10,000 are rounded up to $10,000).

The awarded loans will settle on June 5, 2008, and will mature on July 3, 2008. The stop-out rate shown above will apply to all awarded loans.

Disclosure (“none” means no position):

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Sherwin Williams Lowers Outlook

Input prices are outpacing selling prices, bad math for anyone…

Sherwin Williams (SHW) this morning lowered full year 2008 eps estimates.

The Sherwin-Williams Company Updates 2008 Sales and Earnings Expectations

* Updated FY08 consolidated net sales: down slightly versus 2007
* Updated FY08 EPS range: $3.60 to $4.10 relating to lower sales and gross margins
* Updated 2Q08 EPS range: $1.40 to $1.50 tied to lower domestic net sales and continued raw material and other input cost increases

“For the full year 2008, we anticipate consolidated net sales will be slightly lower than 2007. We had previously expected a low single digit percentage increase in consolidated net sales over 2007. We anticipate diluted net income per common share for 2008 will be in the range of $3.60 to $4.10 per share. The previous expectation for the full year 2008 was in the range of $4.70 to $4.85 per share. The significantly lower expectation of diluted net income per common share for the full year 2008 relates primarily to the expected continuation of the unprecedented downturn in the U.S. housing market and rapidly rising raw material cost increases. The Company reported diluted net income per common share of $4.70 per share for the full year 2007. “

This follows last week’s announcement from Dow Chemical (DOW) that it was implementing a 20% price increase due to rising input costs. Unlike Dow, Sherwin does not have the ability, due to housing, to pass along an increase that large. Were housing still strong, it would.

Now, back to something I have pondered for quit some time. Why doesn’t Dow just buy Sherwin? It is getting cheaper by the day and it valuation is such that it would be “earnings accredive” by year two, could be had for cash on the books and would expand the coating business Liveris has stated he wants to be more into.

Also, it is a partially vertical integration for Dow in that some of the items Sherwin uses in its production are Dow products that, once Dow begins to lower its costs through its various JV’s, would by default lower Sherwin’s costs also.

For those excited by the thought, the good news is that housing will not turn anytime soon (neither will Sherwin’s results) and the Kuwait deal with Dow closes in Q4, giving it $9.5 billion to go shopping. That does mean there isn’t a pressing “time factor” and there are not many other possible suitors with the financial strength of Dow.

We’ll see…

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long SHW, DOW

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

More Sears Musings

Seems the web is a flutter lately with Sears Holdings (SHLD) posts.

The latest today is from Portfolio.com and it essentially reiterates the premise that “most investors have given up on the prospect of a retail turnaround and are counting on Chairman Edward Lampert to begin raising cash through asset sales.”

I guess the question I have to ask is “did anyone really buy shares of Sears thinking Lampert was gunning to give Wal-Mart (WMT) a run for their money”? Really? Did anyone buy shares in a tiny New England textile mill in the 1960’s because they thought Warren Buffett has his sights on Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) becoming a textile empire?

I think Lampert has simply said several times it can be a very profitable business (and has up until last quarter).

Didn’t most people who bought into the company do so because they were intrigued as to what Lampert could wring out of it and parlay that into? Didn’t others of us buy because of that and because we saw the value in underutilized brands like Kenmore, Craftsmen, DieHard and Land’s End and the land they sit on?

I guess the answer to the “Sears as a retailer” question comes down the how it is defined. Are the brands it owns going away? No. Will those brands remain profitable for years? Yes. If that is true, then Sears will be around as a retailer of those brands for years. Will it remain in its current incarnation? Probably not. I have assumed here for a long time Kmart will eventually disappear and to be honest, so what if it does? As long as Lampert can take the dollars received for the location and parlay them into additional dollars in excess of what he made at Kmart, then, does anyone really care if there are 1,200 or 40 Kmarts left in three years?

If, as everyone of the doubters seem to claim Kmart is as lousy as they feel then that feat ought not be that difficult.

Will it happen overnight? No. Years? Yes.

The bottom line here is that Lampert still sits on $1.4 billion at Sears, until he does something with it other than repurchase Sears shares, Sears will be viewed as a
retailer. Once he branches Sears out, then it officially becomes an investment vehicle. One could argue that the new divisional realignment with the REIT division is already a step in that direction but, again, until things there actually take shape most folks will not see it. Like Buffett Lampert is using early ownership years to consolidate his ownership of the company. Today’s prices will allow that process to be expedited.

Who is right and who is wrong? Well, those of us who bought Sears shares years ago are still is the “right” column as we are still way up in our investment. Those who bought at $150, not so much. The good news? Buffett himself has said “you are neither right or wrong because the market says you are, you are either right or wrong because in the end, you are”

“In the end” is the key phrase. Berkshire shareholders (the were a bunch) who panicked at the turn of the century and sold shares when Berkshire plummeted near 50% later regretted that decision. Perhaps they believed the press that Buffett was “out of touch”? Those who doubted the media and used that opportunity to finally own shares (yours truly) later loved the results (I later sold leaving about $600 per “b” share on the table).

Sears is not an investment on a “quick retail turnaround”. It is an investment in a cash generating mechanism and what its head can eventually do with that cash. Because of that, measuring the outcome of the investment based on a quarter or two or a slide (or jump) in the share price will lead folks to assume too much in either direction.

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long SHLD

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Tuesday’s Links

Opportunities, Opportunities, Apple, Immelt

Ron Baron

Tweedy Browne

– Does bad news really not matter?

Buys GE (GE) shares

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Tuesday's Links

Opportunities, Opportunities, Apple, Immelt

Ron Baron

Tweedy Browne

– Does bad news really not matter?

Buys GE (GE) shares

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books