Categories
Premium Articles

Subs: Orion

Orion Energy Systems, Inc. (NYSE MKT: OESX), a leading power technology enterprise, announced today financial results for its fiscal 2013 first quarter.

Neal Verfuerth, Chief Executive Officer of Orion commented, “Given our recent release of the InteLite® integrated system, which addresses the market for both LED and fluorescent full-range dimming technologies, the quarter is consistent with our expectations for our year-to-date progress. Our value proposition continues to be validated by customer adoption. Furthermore, the higher average selling price of this product presents numerous growth opportunities well into the future.”

First Quarter of Fiscal 2013

  • For the first quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company reported revenues of $15.3 million, a 16% decrease compared to $18.2 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2012.
  • For the first quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company reported a net loss of $1.9 million, or $(0.09) per share. For the first quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company’s net loss was $0.8 million, or $(0.03) per share.
  • Total order backlog as of June 30, 2012 was $50.5 million. The Company currently expects approximately $25.4 million of the existing backlog to be recognized as revenue during the remainder of fiscal 2013.

Cash, Debt and Liquidity Position

Orion had $19.0 million in cash and cash equivalents and $1.0 million in short-term investments as of June 30, 2012, compared to $23.0 million and $1.0 million, respectively, at March 31, 2012. The reduction in cash during the quarter was primarily due to $2.5 million used to repurchase common shares, $1.0 million for capital expenditures and $0.7 million for the repayment of debt. Total short and long-term debt was $8.8 million as of June 30, 2012, compared to $9.5 million as of March 31, 2012. There were no borrowings outstanding under the Company’s revolving credit facility as of June 30, 2012, which has an availability of $13.3 million.

Key Business Highlights

During the first quarter of fiscal 2013:

Orion increased the number of facilities retrofitted with its energy management technologies to 8,212 as of the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2013 (compared to 7,986 as of the end of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012), representing 1.2 billion square feet of installed facilities.

Total Megawatts, or MWs, under contract from solar projects increased to 27.3 MWs as of the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2013 (compared to 24.0 MW’s under contract as of the end of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012).

The Company repurchased 1.2 million shares of its common stock at an average price per share of approximately $2.09 during the fiscal 2013 first quarter. Under the current authorized $7.5 million share repurchase plan, the Company has repurchased 1.5 million shares at a total cost of $3.2 million.

Here is the earnings supplemental

Nothing exciting/depressing on the call. They did mention they may be looking for smaller bolt on deals. While revenue was down YOY, the backlog the company has was up ~18% YOY so the business is there. $OESX said companies were slowing down capex plans and that does jive with what we have seen in other businesses this quarter as they report earnings.

But, unlike ’08-’09 they are simply canceling deals, they are just slower to approve than they were in ’11.

Here is a chart from the earnings call on the pipeline:

So the interest is clearly there and this ought to continue to filter into a larger backlog which will then flow into revenues.

While it never makes one happy to see revenue fall, that is offset by a larger than expected growth in the backlog. The key when they report next is to see what filters through. Further, on the call they did state that this backlog was higher margin business so a dollar for dollar flow to revenue will result in larger sums dropping to the bottom line.

The industry shifting to LED also had an effect on current revenues as $OESX went back to current customers in the pipeline with LED information that has lead to many orders in the current backlog not flowing to revenue. They feel that this effect is temporary while customers digest choices. LED pricing is 4X higher in some cases.

End market strength was in distribution centers (food service, Storage, shipping) since they must reduce costs to improve profits as they do not manufacture something.

Categories
Premium Articles

Subs: Tuesday’s Links

Categories
Premium Articles

Subs: “Analysts”

Categories
Premium Articles

Subs: 30 Days To The Next Treasury Sale

Categories
Premium Articles

Subs: Remember That “Potential $9.6B Liability” For BAC Due To Interchange Fees?? Try $200 Million

Categories
Premium Articles

Subs: AIG Call & Buyback

Categories
Premium Articles

Subs: New Trade

Categories
Premium Articles

Subs: GGP

Categories
Premium Articles

Subs: AIG Reports *** Updated w/10Q Review***

Categories
Premium Articles

Subs: Jamba *** Updated w/10Q Review***

***UPDATE AT END***

Categories
Premium Articles

Subs: JOE Homesite Sales Up 68%

Categories
Premium Articles

Subs: AIG

Categories
Premium Articles

Subs: Ford

Categories
Premium Articles

Subs: Getting Juiced About Energy

Come ‘on….that was kinda witty….no?

This might be the reason $JMBA decided to take control of its Energy Drink from Nestle:

From Food Product Design:

For the first time, energy drinks have outsold bottled water (for the 52 weeks ending April 15 in U.S. supermarkets, drug, gas, convenience and mass merchandise retailers, excluding Walmart, per SymphonyIRI Group). During that period, energy drinks garnered more than $6.9 billion in sales for a 19.4% increase over the previous year; bottled water saw $6.7 billion in sales for a 3.4% increase.

Red Bull remains the top seller in the category, with nearly 40% market share for a total of $2.8 billion in sales. A recent addition to the line is Red Bull Total Zero, a slight reformulation of Red Bull Sugar Free (Total Zero is calorie-free while Sugar Free has 13 calories). In addition to the caloric difference (likely achieved via the addition of sucralose to the sweetener mix), Total Zero has slightly more caffeine (3 mg more in the 8.4-oz. can) and a slightly different flavor.

Both Monster Energy and Rockstar are starting to target the recovery market. Monster Rehab uses a tagline of “refresh, revive, rehydrate,” with one version (Protean) containing 15 grams of protein per can. Rockstar Recovery seeks to provide “energy + hydration” in a low-calorie beverage enhanced with electrolytes.

The Beverage Industry report notes that emerging categories in energy include natural options. Jamba Juice, Campbell’s Soup (via its V8 line) and Starbucks carrying “natural” energy lines.

Energy shots also continue to perform well. That segment is dominated by 5-Hour Energy (Living Essentials, LLC), which captured over 90% of the market. However, more companies, including Monster, with its concentrated 5-oz. M3 product, continue to enter this segment.

Also:

Back in March of this year, Jamba Juice took control of its energy-based retail line from Nestlé USA (its previous formulation partner) and is expanding distribution of the drinks nationally. The “all natural” energy drinks differentiate themselves in the market by remaining very juice-centric. They contain 70% juice in three flavors, strawberry-banana, apple, and pomegranate-blueberry, and get their energy boost from caffeine. These products complement Jamba Juice’s other retail offerings, including smoothie kits and superfruit shots, as well as assorted food items. The company had previously only licensed out its retail offerings, but is now taking the reigns as it delves into more CPG development.

Although these canned beverages are available in retail outlets like convenience and grocery stores, they’re also for sale in the company’s foodservice chain locations. And analysts have pointed out that many fast-food consumers are also energy-drink consumers, suggesting that operators could capitalize on this market synergy by offering more energy drinks. When consumers of energy drinks were surveyed as to whether or not they would buy energy drinks in a quick-service restaurant environment, 81% responded positively.

Juice, as well as tea (tea sales are rising…), will continue to play a big role in the next generation of energy drinks. Green, unroasted coffee beans (with their chlorogenic acid content), a key ingredient in the Starbucks Refreshers line, are also worth looking into. Chlorogenic acid might have a positive impact on weight management, which would be beneficial in a line of energy drinks for women (not that men couldn’t benefit from weight-loss assistance, but it’s a harder sell…). And folks, including on Wall Street, are eating more chia (a hot ingredient all around…) for its energy benefits.

This leads to the need to expand the types of energy drinks available to target wide-ranging demographics. Aging consumers regularly cite a desire to have sufficient energy for the day’s activities. Through judicious ingredient selection—and sound marketing—you could quickly find a new audience for energy drinks there. With active men and women, sports nutrition would be a target (I’m waiting for the arrival of a whole-fruit banana-based sports energy shot after seeing the recent news on the benefits of that fruit…).

Energy drinks will continue to diversify over the long term—and specific groups of consumers are just waiting for a product that speaks to them to regularly get into their shopping carts.

What amazes me is that 5 Hour Energy is the leader with $893M in annual sales. Astounding number….

Could $JMBA produce an “All Natural Energy Shot”? Sure they could. It would be cheap and easy to consume and go perfectly in the C-Store checkout lines. Will they? Hell if I know but the point here is that this category is FAR from mature and there is still amazing growth ahead and $JMBA is right there in the “All Natural” category.

So next I want to know about distribution. They took control from Nestle in the spring but I am not seeing the energy drink pop up in grocery or c-stores around me like I am the smoothie kits or the frozen yogurt. I notice it is out of stock on $AMZN (some third parry sellers have some inventory left) where I used to get it and I am wondering if that is step one to a physical store distribution deal with a $TGT, $WMT or some grocery chains. I am hoping it isn’t because they are running low on inventory…

I would be surprised if that was the case as it would be a very non-White thing to have happen so I am inclined to think perhaps that inventory is being spread around. There is more value for $JMBA selling individual cans vs cases of 12 both in terms of profits and exposure.

Categories
Premium Articles

Subs: Trade