Categories
Articles

Altria / UST……..hmmmmm

The deal between Altria (MO) and UST (UST) will make Altria the clear leader in both smokeless and traditional tobacco. It also must be an admission that their offering will enter the “non premium” space below the Copnehagen and Skole offerings from UST.

The deal, rumored to be worth more than $10 billion could be announced as early as Monday, though the timing could be sooner given media reports of the negotiations. UST shares are up 24 percent in trading from a close of $54 on Thursday. As expected, Altria spokesman David Sylvia declined to comment on speculation about a deal. A UST spokesman could not be reached for comment.

Given the long term future of smoking, Altria moving into this market is a must. Even if Altria is forced to raise their price to $70 a share, that would only represent a 16% premium to UST’s January high, not expensive by any means given the brands in UST control.

It would also ad about $1 billion a year in earnings (rough number not accounting for synergies) to the $4 billion Altria already produces.

The larger point here would be gaining access to UST sales and distribution channels for its own smokeless offering. Rather than develop these, a UST purchase simply allows those folks to begin offering and pushing Altria’s smokeless products through their channels. That, is a very valuable asset for Altria.

It also means Altria, in one swoop now becomes the player in the smokeless market, whereas now they are sitting on the sidelines.

If you are going to buy into a markets, go for the top of it.


Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long MO, none
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Wells Fargo Expanding Insurance Business

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, is this 2008 or 1990? Wells Fargo (WFC) is doing the little things like it did in 1990 that made shareholders very happy for the next almost two decades.

America’s largest bank-owned insurance brokerage and a subsidiary of Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) – announced that it has acquired the assets of Spokane, Washington’s Char Clark Associates, Inc. The acquisition adds to Wells Fargo’s diversified presence in Washington State – now a total of 4,300 team members across the region, serving customers from 147 banking stores and 5 insurance brokerage offices.

Founded 24 years ago, Char Clark Associates provides group and individual health, life, disability, dental and vision coverages – focusing on the employee and executive benefit needs of customers ranging in size from one to several hundred employees.

Company shareholder Charlaine “Char” Clark and her team will transition operations into the Wells Fargo Insurance Services office in Spokane, WA. Terms of the transaction were not disclosed.

“We are excited to offer expanded resources, services and support to Char Clark & Associates’ customers,” said Mark Neupert, managing director of Wells Fargo Insurance Services’ Spokane office. “Char is well known and highly respected in the local business community and in our broader marketplace and she and her team will be a tremendous addition to our growing operations here in Eastern Washington and across the entire Pacific Northwest.”

“We’re delighted to join such a well respected organization that lets us broaden and enhance the products, services and solutions we deliver to our customers,” said Char Clark. “Our customers will receive the same great service from the same committed professionals, and they’ll now have access to a wider range of resources and services to help them succeed financially.”

“We’ve grown to become one of America’s largest insurance brokerage companies by combining our national resources with great local agencies like Char Clark Associates, Inc.,” said Dave Zuercher, president, chairman and CEO of Wells Fargo Insurance Services. “We’ll continue to look for agency acquisitions that advance and strengthen our vision, values and geographic interests across the country.”

CEO John Stumpf said recently that he wanted to expend the company’s insurance operations and its footprint in the Northwest. This deal does both.

At a time where other banks like Citi (C), Wachovia (WB) and others are shedding (or trying to) assets at a breakneck pace, Wells Fargo is quietly expanding its business and growing stronger.

It worked before, no reason to expect it won’t again…


Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long WFC, C, WB
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Friday’s Links

Lead, Thank you, Annello, “moral hazard”

– Jane Genova “moving on up” at Point of Law

– Thank you for the mention and your additional work.

– Annello take on the MSM and points out what they do not see

“The Job of Federal Reserve of the is to create Moral Hazard”


Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Palin Speech (video)

For those who missed it… best line (there were many)? “Do you know the difference between a hockey mom and a pitbull? Lipstick”. The speech drew 37 plus million people, only 1 million less than Obama’s. Wanna bet that had million of people in Louisiana, Mississippi and East Texas not be displaced due to the hurricane , she would have easily beat him? I think so too.

Part 1:

Part 2

Part 3

Part 4


Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Wal-Mart’s "Guidance" Changes Reaction to Results

This is a classic. So just last month when Wal-Mart came in at 3% comps and people were inexplicably disappointed and then guided for 1% to 2% for August, I said “Anyone want to bet Wal-Mart is lowering projections to avoid the current scenario next month? Now Wall St. will lower “estimates”, Wal-Mart will beat them and everyone will be happy…..strange stuff.” Guess what happened today?

Wal-Mart (WMT) said Thursday sales of groceries and back-to-school products helped its August same-store sales rise 3 percent, beating expectations.

Sales in stores open at least one year, a measure known as same-store sales, rose 2.8 percent at Wal-Mart Stores and 4.2 percent at Sam’s Club for the four weeks ended Aug. 29. Analysts polled by Thomson Reuters predicted a 1.6 percent rise.

Including fuel, the world’s largest retailer’s total same-store sales rose 3.5 percent. Total company sales rose 9 percent to $30.67 billion in the four-week period.

“The underlying business performance for Walmart U.S. continued to show strength and the improved relative performance has resulted in market share gains,” said Eduardo Castro-Wright, Walmart U.S. president and chief executive, in a statement.

Isn’t this just great? Same number but because they issue different guidance, people were upset before and are thrilled today. Maybe Sears’ (SHLD) Eddie Lampert and Berkshire’s (BRK.a) Warren Buffett are onto something by not issuing guidance.

It also goes to show the most of Wall St. simply bases their expectations on those set by the company.

Oh yea…the company said it expects September same-store sales to rise 2 percent to 3 percent. Now if we come in a 3% again, we’ll “meet the high end of expectations” and that will be good news. 4% and people will be dancing.

Such nonsense…


Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long WMT, SHLD, none
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Final Legal Hurdle for Altria Upcomng

The real last legal hurdle for Altria (MO) ought to be finally settled this fall /spring.


From the Wall. St. Journal

U.S. v. Philip Morris: Topping the list is United States v. Philip Morris, an appeal of the decade-long civil racketeering case against the tobacco industry. Philip Morris, now known as Altria Group, is challenging the 2006 verdict which found that it and six other Big Tobacco defendants conspired for years to deceive the public about the health risks of tobacco. In addition to upholding the lower-court verdict, the government is asking the court to order the tobacco industry to pay more than $12 billion to fund a smoking cessation program and to fund an educational, counter-marketing campaign. Miguel Estrada of Gibson Dunn and Michael Carvin of Jones Day plan to argue the case on behalf of Altria.

What happened?

After several years of pretrial activity, during which all of the government’s theories except for the civil RICO claims were dismissed, a federal judge began hearing trial testimony in September 2004. During trial, the U.S. Court of Appeals issued a major ruling disallowing much of the relief (disgorgement of profits) sought by the government.

On August 17, 2006, U.S. District Court Judge Gladys Kessler ruled that PM USA, Altria Group and the other cigarette companies violated civil provisions of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). The court refused to order the companies to pay $10 billion for a smoking cessation program or $4 billion for a “counter-marketing” youth advertising program sought by the government but found, among other things, the companies must remove descriptors such as “light” or “ultra light” from cigarette packages and publish statements concerning smoking and health issues.

On October 31, 2006, the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia stayed implementation of Judge Kessler’s remedies order until the companies are able to appeal the merits of the case. In the interim, all remedies ordered in the case have been stayed. The defendants are now asking the appeals court to set aside the ruling in its entirety. The Government is asking for the $12 billion in damages they sought to be reinstated.

What will happen?

When you consider in 1997 Attorney General Janet Reno declared at a Congressional hearing that “the federal government does not have an independent cause of action” against the tobacco industry for violations of Medicare or Medicaid statutes, one has to wonder why we are even at this point.

Expect the decision to be upheld, the gov’t is grasping desperately at straws on this one.


Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long MO
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Thursday’s Links

Palin, Natural Gas, Biden / Obama, “Mojave

– An actually solution to oil companies that is helpful

– Think really does make sense

– Let’s get on the same page boys

What’s in a name

Disclosure (“none” means no position):
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Donny Deutsch on VP Palin Tonight.

Check out this video. I am not a huge fan of his show, but Donny Deutsch really does make some great points about voters.


Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Oil and Dow Chemical’s Q3:: Updated

Now that august is in the books, let’s look at where we are and update an earlier post.

Prior Post


In the call
the following exchange was had:
Jeffrey Zekauskas – JPMorgan
“Good morning. On average shouldn’t your raw material costs be down sequentially in the third quarter? Natural gas has gone from — I don’t know — $12 to $9 and oil has come from $135 to $125?”

Geoffery E. Merszei – Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Member of the Board of Directors
“Yeah Jeff, this is Geoffrey here. Just to take oil, Brent crude average price as of this morning, let’s say, $124, $125. At today’s level it is still higher than our average cost during the first quarter. The average cost in the first quarter was around $122. I’m using crude as a reference point. And we are already towards the end of the first month of one-third of the quarter. So if you use an average rate for the third quarter of let’s say around $125, $126 then you are talking about over $0.5 billion additional cost for the company to absorb.”

It would look like that based on current demand for its products every $3 plus or minus in its cost of oil results in about a $500 million cost increase or decrease.

Dow’s Q2 average was $122 and change and oil now sits at $117. What is also of interest is the price increases announced earlier this summer were only about 40% implemented during Q2. By the time Q3 is finished, they ought to be fully implemented which means revenues ought to post another record quarter assuming no dramatic demand destruction (unlikely).

What does it all mean? Should oil prices remain lower than $122 for the quarter and with the price increases now fully implemented, the 66 cents a share earnings that analysts anticipate are beginning to look as though it is far too low.

Where are we at? July crude averaged $134 and August finished at $115. September has started off at $108.

We are essentially flat vs Q2 for the cost of oil (USO) for Dow (DOW) $122 vs $124. The difference will be the price increases that will be fully implemented in this quarter (they were only 1/3 implemented during Q2). Should prices remain where they are for the month ($108), Dow will finish the quarter at about $119 a barrel of cost, adding $500 million to the bottom line for shareholders, price increases not withstanding.

Of course one should also assume Dow may be entering into more contracts at lower prices now and that this will reduce the average purchase below just a simple daily average reading in the example above.

This is a fun exercise but when you look at it, as the year goes by it becomes far less necessary. Dow has essentially traded 50% interest in its oil dependent commodity business to Kuwait for Rohm and Hass (ROH) in its entirety and picked up Berkshire Hathaway’s (BRK.A) Warren Buffett as an investor to boot. Not a bad deal when you look at it that way.

It is still only 2/3 of the way through the quarter but I am thinking there are going to be a whole lot of shareholders very happy with the earnings surprise Dow turns in after Q3 is over…


Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long Dow, none
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

ESL Files 13D/A in Sears Holdings

Eddie Lampert’s ESL Investments just filed a 13D/A with the SEC in regards to Sears Holdings (SHLD)

“This Amendment No. 12 to Schedule 13D (this “Amendment”) relates to shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Holdings Common Stock”), of Sears Holdings Corporation (“Holdings”). This Amendment No. 12 supplementally amends the Statement on Schedule 13D, as amended, filed by the Reporting Persons (as defined below) by furnishing the information set forth below. Unless set forth below, all previous Items are unchanged. Capitalized terms used herein which are not defined herein have the meanings given to them in the Schedule 13D, as amended, previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Based on the most recently disclosed number of outstanding shares of Holdings Common Stock, the Reporting Persons are filing this Amendment to report an increase in their respective current beneficial ownership percentages of Holdings Common Stock, which for certain of the Reporting Persons is 51.9%, resulting from a decrease in the number of outstanding shares of Holdings Common Stock. “

FULL FILING


Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long SHLD
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Wednesday’s Links

Blackmail, Thain, Snow, iPhone

– “They made me do it”? classic

– This makes one

– Once summer is over, let it snow

– A real blow for its business use


Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Time to Get Back In Oil?

With the current price roughly 25% of its high, it is time to put oil back on the radar screen.

Watch what Boone Pickens has to say.

I sold my USO position in May for $106.85, a 140% gain in 16 months (purchased for $44 in Jan. 2007). It now sots at $89, 16% below the sale price.

Buy now? No.

The global economy by almost every measure is slowing. Will it be a “global recession”? No. The pace of expansion will just slow. That will relieve some demand stress on the whole equation. The US economy, the main consumer of oil looks as though it will muddle through 2009.

With that being said, the supply / demand equation for oil, tilted to the demand side for the last year, ought to begin to stabilize. As it does, interest in the commodity will wane as easy profits will diminish. As it does, the price of oil (barring any significant geopolitical event) will slide with it.

How far? Under $100 or another 7% to 10% lower. Long term, the demand for oil will rise, significantly. Any temporary demand reduction from China or India is just that, temporary. The US will wake from its current snooze and demand at home will grow along with it.

What could offset this? A cellulose ethanol breakthrough that could quadruple US ethanol production almost overnight and displace 900 million barrel of oil demand for gasoline. That essentially equates to 90 days of oil imports becoming unnecessary.

Natural gas. Should actually go it it (it is right off our coasts) we could use it to power vehicles. It would be cheaper than oil, reduce exports and be cleaner.

Here is the thing. either of those two events are at least a year off in the case of ethanol and probably almost a decade for natural gas. That means China, India and a resurgent US demand rule the equation until then. That means higher prices..

It may take a while and you may have to weather a hurricane or two that will pump a temporary rise in prices but I think if you are patient, you will be able to pickup the USO and the price equivalent of crude under $100.


Disclosure (“none” means no position):None
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Now, Some Borders Math

I was emailed a research note on Borders (BGP) by a reader and based on that, we can take closer look at FY 2009

Deutsche Bank – Equity Research

Borders Group {Ticker: BGP.N, Closing Price: 6.55, Target Price: 6.00, Recommendation: Hold}

*Key thoughts

Overall, this week’s BGP results were mixed, but more positive than negative, in our view. Primarily, we can’t overlook the positive P&L impact of continued cost cutting, especially if mgmt.’s confidence of hitting $120M over the next two years is realized. That said, top-line weakness and concerns on its timing and degree of recovery were highlighted by the 2Q reporting season, as BGP’s results and BKS’ 2H
plan disappointed, we believe.

At this point, our biggest concerns on BGP are (1) if/when will brick & mortar sales meaningfully improve, (2) the ongoing competitive threats from the internet and print digitization, and the effects on superstore sales/margins, (3) can substantial cost cutting be delivered, and without ‘hitting bone’ (hurting sales)? (4) BGP
announced its ‘strategic alternatives process’ on 3/20/08, but to date Paperchase (and the company) has not been sold. Notably, if Paperchase is ‘put’ to Pershing (among other reasons), expect a more modest selling price and potentially, further share dilution.

Cost cutting and liquidity were the big positives in 2Q, we believe.

*Few changes to our model

We’ve tweaked our FY08/FY09 models, but we haven’t yet run the full $120M in cost cuts through the P&L (we’re at roughly half that). For FY08, we are now at -$0.14 from -$0.13, with FY09 at +$0.06 from
$0.03.

The bold section is the one that is important. On the Earnings call, Borders was not only adamant they would hit the $120 million in savings, but said they expected to beat that. Now, with 60 million shares outstanding, and only $60 million in savings baked into the above estimates the simple math tells us the is another $1 a share (or more) in potential earnings that are not being accounted for.

If they hit the extra savings and get $1.03 a share in earnings in FY 2009 and the stock trades at a comparable premium to Barnes & Noble (BKS) of 12 times earnings, then we are looking at $12.36 a share for a price target.

Perhaps this is the reason the stock has raced past their $6 target?


Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long BGP, none
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Book Review: "Black Swan"

Nassim Nicholas Taleb, if you read his book “The Black Swan” ought to change the filter you look at life through.

I do recommend reading Taleb’s prior effort, “Fooled By Randomness”. You can purchase it below. I think reading it first is helpful, though not necessary.

Now, onto “Black Swan”:

Taleb argues that “Black Swans”, or drastic events (to simplify it) are both unavoidable and unpredictable in life. Whether they be an assassination, accident, weather event, geopolitical event, terrorist etc., the world we live in cannot be predicted with any accuracy, save for the fact these events will happen. Again, the “when” is unpredictable.

There will be those who predict these events, but Taleb compares these to the broken clock is that is still right twice a day. There is always someone who predicts an event, it is just never the same someone.

What Taleb does is change the filter you see information through. For instance, value investors see a stock drop and think, “hmmm, let’s look closer”, growth investors see the same price action and think “run away”. Same situation, different filters (I know the above comparison is overly simplistic but I hope the basic point is made).

Taleb will change the filter of “risk” you have AND, more importantly, alter the way you look at those who predict macro events. The argument can be made, successfully, I might add, that predicting GDP or the Fed. Budget more than 6 months out is an effort in futility. Taleb argues that investing and relying on these predictions is a recipe for disaster.

For instance, a nuclear reactor melting down in Iran, shutting its oil fields would be a “Black Swan event that would throw every economic prediction made in the last two year out the window, not only for the US, but the world. Taleb says that events like that, on various scales happen all the time and make long range predictions is useless.

This was one of those books you look back on after reading and just say…..”wow”.


Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Value Investor’s Rejoice: "It is Dead"

A recent article said, “More than a few cynics have proclaimed value investing to be dead. Its plight hasn’t been this dire since the height of the technology bubble.” That bubble also lead to a near decade of outsized return for value investors.

Remember that tech bubble? It was the one before the recent housing bubble? Remember? Berkshire’s (BRK.a) Warren Buffett was mocked and called “out of touch”?

Yahoo (YHOO) traded at 144 times earnings? There were scores of $100 stocks that actually had NO earnings. Good times…..until it all came crashing down.

What survived? Yup, “Out of touch” Warren’s stock went on to almost triple over the next 7 years (“b” share climbed from $1790 to $4900 a share).

Meanwhile, shares of Microsoft (MSFT), Yahoo, Dell (DELL) fell and have never regained anything near their prior levels. There are countless other ones but most of those businesses no longer exist.

Value investing seems to be at its most valuable right when people proclaim its “death”. It is ironic because that is often when we start getting interested in the stock of a company, when the masses hate it.

In Seth Klarman’s “Margin of Safety“, he says “Security prices sometimes fluctuate, not based on any apparent changes in reality, but on changes in investor perception.”

He concludes his first chapter with this:

“The financial markets offer many temptations to vulnerable investors. It is easy to do the wrong thing, to speculate rather than invest. Emotion lies dangerously close to the surface for most investors and can be particularly intense when market prices move dramatically in either direction. It is crucial that investors understand the difference between speculating and investing and learn to take advantage of the opportunities presented
by Mr. Market.”

When people begin to speculate about the demise of histories most successful investing strategy, emotions are running the days an great opportunities will arise.


Disclosure (“none” means no position):none
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books