Categories
Articles

Monday Humor, Otherwise Known as the Cicuit City (CC) Earnings Call

Some of these are priceless, when I get into this I feel like I am in a Corporate version of “Spinal Tap”. I think Schoonover actually believes himself…

“I am very pleased to report to you that our first quarter results were above our guidance and the company is on track to deliver its financial guidance for the year. Fiscal year 2009 will be a year of very hard work and focus on execution, but we expect to improve our financial performance compared with fiscal year 2008 and set the stage to return to sustainable profitability in the future.” said Schoonover leading off the latest earnings call.

OK, but wasn’t Q1 already considerably worse than last year and did we expect Q2 to be worse that last year? Answer? It was and Q2 will be. Just how good does Schoonover expect Q’s 3 and 4 to be?

“We saw improvement in trends in nearly every category. The work is progressing well and we must maintain our focus in order to produce year-over-year improvement in our financial results.”

True, except for sales, profits, margins, debt and cash. They were all worse.

COO John Harlow said:
“We measure customer satisfaction in two ways; one, through third-party mystery shops; and second, through customer first scores. We saw another 250 basis point improvement in mystery shop scores from March to May, on top of a 600 basis point improvement we saw from when we started measuring in July to March.”

You could measure them in repeat sales? After a larger drop (12.2%) than any other electronics retailer last quarter, people are just not shopping there.

Back to Schoonover:
“We still have a long way to go but I am encouraged by what we’ve been able to accomplish in the quarter. In short, we are building a new Circuit City that will be much stronger when economic headwinds subside. Bill.”

Now, he has been there for three for three years now and results have deteriorated even when the were not only no “economic headwinds” but “tailwinds”. That gives us no reason to expect anything different when the do “subside” which, by the way, may be another year or so.

Why will the 2nd half of this year be better than last?

Schoonover: “Just one last thing — on a go-forward basis, as I think you’ve seen, the first quarter is certainly the most difficult quarter on the two-year comps for us and so as we go through the year, the ability to sustain and build versus an area where we had slipped last year, we see that as being another level of our ability to deliver for Q2 and beyond.”

So, it will not be due to a resurgence of the business but “easier comps”. Way to go boys…

Here is a great exchange:

Michael Lasser – Lehman Brothers

“It sounds like a lot of the focus has been on the in-store experience and you are pleased with some of the gains that you’ve made there with improving the close rate and the like. Can you talk a bit more about what you are doing to improve traffic and the draw rate? Because perhaps some of the improvements that you are witnessing are due to the declines in traffic and you are losing, you are moving closer to a core group of customers and as you lose out on some of those folks that have a lower propensity to purchase, that would cause the close rate to increase. So perhaps you could talk a little bit about the traffic.”

John J. Kelly:CMO

“Some of the things that we are doing to improve traffic in addition, we obviously had been using our movies and music departments to drive traffic. Now we’ve moved into some of the more commodity type of products, such as Flash media and other types of media, product-centric and PC accessories to drive traffic. You are seeing demand for that type of product as prices come down and it begins to [commodicize] the ability for us to use those products as traffic drivers, and use them out in front, the front covers and back covers of our task to drive people into the building to purchase these products, and we can use that to offset what we see as a decline in music and movies.”

John T. Harlow: COO

“I think our plans and strategies this year focus on close rate and basket attach, and we expect in a tougher economy with declining industry trends in packaged media to actually see less traffic.

We mentioned a couple of times that our first quarter was our toughest comp. It was also our toughest traffic comp for the year last year, and we have aggressive promotional calendars throughout the year around all the holiday drive times, beginning with back-to-school later this summer.

But bottom line here is most of the changes we’ve made are in the home entertainment side of our store. That’s roughly half of our company’s revenue and more than half the company’s profit. We are focused on optimizing those customers from a revenue standpoint and from a profit standpoint.”

OK, but can you answer the question now? Are the “customer service” gains constantly mentioned simply due to the fact that those being quantified are those that are “the choir” and love the store? Are they the only ones left to judge now that the median buyer has left for Best Buy (BBY)?

Were are still waiting for the answer boys…

You know what this reminded me off? The Captain of the Titanic walking around marveling at the newly painted dining room of the ship while it slowly sinks.


Read the whole call here:

Disclosure (“none” means no position):None

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Now Its JP Morgan (JPM) & Wachovia (WB)

This make a whole lot more sense than the previous rumor.

The latest rumor has Jamie Dimon and JP Morgan making an offer for Wachovia.

The deal make sense for a couple reasons. Unlike Bear Sterns (BSC), Wachovia is a bank with investor deposits. Dimon has made very public his desire to expand his banking franchise into the SE and a Wachovia deal would do just that. While a deal would push the combined bank over the 10% threshold for deposits, I think it is not a very large stretch to suggest that Congress would happily raise that cap to avoid more banking problems and /or more Middle East and Asian investing in another US bank should Wachovia need more capital.

The other option is SunTrust (STI) bank. Two things make this deal slightly less appealing for Dimon. It is a far smaller bank that Wachovia (roughly 1/3 the size) so its eventual impact on JP will be less. It also trades at a valuation that is 40% higher than its book value relative to what Wachovia trades at (.7 vs .5).

The valuation is a key point. By this metric Dimon could pay Wachovia shareholders a 40% share premium, (this is just an example) which would easily get approval and get the bank relative to its book for a current market price of SunTrust. Wachovia shareholders would jump (leap) at the opportunity to get $24 and change (or shares) for their holdings and have it run by Dimon vs whomever Wachovia decides will be the permanent replacement for ousted CEO Thompson.

Will it happen? I think consolidation is inevitable and it as not really happened yet. Citi (C) is out as a suitor, Bank of America (BAC) is trying to deal with the Countywide (CFC) fallout and Wells Fargo I think is just not interested in something the size of Wachovia. That leaves Dimon as the only real suitor.

What will he offer? I think far less that $24 a share and I think Wachovia shareholder will take just about anything at this point. If I am being honest, anything they offer to have Dimon in charge is better than just about anything Wachovia will eventually do anyway so let go….

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long WB, WFC, C, None

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Monday's Links

Countrywide, Gore, Tilson, Dykstra

– These guys talk about ethics in business?

– Agreed

– Whitney responds

– Glad I ain’t Lenny

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Monday’s Links

Countrywide, Gore, Tilson, Dykstra

– These guys talk about ethics in business?

– Agreed

– Whitney responds

– Glad I ain’t Lenny

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Monday's Upgrades and Downgrades


UPGRADES
Microchip (MCHP)- AmTech Research Hold » Buy
McKesson (MCK)- Leerink Swann Mkt Perform » Outperform
Houston Wire & Cable (HWCC)- William Blair Mkt Perform » Outperform
ITT Educational (ESI)- William Blair Mkt Perform » Outperform
AMR Corp (AMR)- Soleil Sell » Buy
Beazer Homes (BZH)- UBS Sell » Neutral
Apollo Group (APOL)- Credit Suisse Neutral » Outperform
Pepsi Bottling (PBG)- JP Morgan Underweight » Neutral
Fifth Third (FITB)- Keefe Bruyette Mkt Perform » Outperform
Cott (COT)- CIBC Wrld Mkts Sector Perform » Sector Outperform
Portland Gen Elec (POR)- JP Morgan Underweight » Neutral

DOWNGRADES
IDEX Corp (IEX)- Janney Mntgmy Scott Buy » Neutral
BioMed Realty (BMR)- Stifel Nicolaus Buy » Hold
OraSure Tech (OSUR)- Needham Buy » Hold
Biovail (BVF)- CIBC Wrld Mkts Sector Perform » Sector Underperform
DeVRY (DV)- Credit Suisse Outperform » Neutral
Sybase (SY)- Banc of America Sec Buy » Neutral
Frontier Fincl (FTBK)- Keefe Bruyette Mkt Perform » Underperform
Intl Rectifier (IRF)- Citigroup Hold » Sell
SanDisk (SNDK)- Citigroup Buy » Hold
ProLogis (PLD)- Banc of America Sec Buy » Neutral
Owens & Minor (OMI)- Banc of America Sec Neutral » Sell
Polypore Intl (PPO)- JP Morgan Overweight » Neutral
Denny’s (DENN)- Merriman Curhan Ford Buy » Neutral
Symantec (SYMC)- Friedman Billings Outperform » Mkt Perform

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Monday’s Upgrades and Downgrades


UPGRADES
Microchip (MCHP)- AmTech Research Hold » Buy
McKesson (MCK)- Leerink Swann Mkt Perform » Outperform
Houston Wire & Cable (HWCC)- William Blair Mkt Perform » Outperform
ITT Educational (ESI)- William Blair Mkt Perform » Outperform
AMR Corp (AMR)- Soleil Sell » Buy
Beazer Homes (BZH)- UBS Sell » Neutral
Apollo Group (APOL)- Credit Suisse Neutral » Outperform
Pepsi Bottling (PBG)- JP Morgan Underweight » Neutral
Fifth Third (FITB)- Keefe Bruyette Mkt Perform » Outperform
Cott (COT)- CIBC Wrld Mkts Sector Perform » Sector Outperform
Portland Gen Elec (POR)- JP Morgan Underweight » Neutral

DOWNGRADES
IDEX Corp (IEX)- Janney Mntgmy Scott Buy » Neutral
BioMed Realty (BMR)- Stifel Nicolaus Buy » Hold
OraSure Tech (OSUR)- Needham Buy » Hold
Biovail (BVF)- CIBC Wrld Mkts Sector Perform » Sector Underperform
DeVRY (DV)- Credit Suisse Outperform » Neutral
Sybase (SY)- Banc of America Sec Buy » Neutral
Frontier Fincl (FTBK)- Keefe Bruyette Mkt Perform » Underperform
Intl Rectifier (IRF)- Citigroup Hold » Sell
SanDisk (SNDK)- Citigroup Buy » Hold
ProLogis (PLD)- Banc of America Sec Buy » Neutral
Owens & Minor (OMI)- Banc of America Sec Neutral » Sell
Polypore Intl (PPO)- JP Morgan Overweight » Neutral
Denny’s (DENN)- Merriman Curhan Ford Buy » Neutral
Symantec (SYMC)- Friedman Billings Outperform » Mkt Perform

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

The Week's Top Insider Buys

Deal volume by dollar amount.

Helix Energy Solutions Group Inc (HLX)= $9,999,849
Oragenics Inc (ONI)= $2,501,001
Synovus Financial Corp (SNV)= $2,064,314
Cbeyond Inc (CBEY)= $2,013,255
Emeritus Corp (ESC)= $1,606,337
Great Wolf Resorts Inc (WOLF)= $1,581,181
Marathon Acquisition Corp (MAQ)= $1,567,529
Neuro Hitech Inc (NHPI)= $1,260,000
General Electric Co (GE)= $1,049,650
Crescent Financial Corp (CRFN)= $1,014,070
Transwitch Corp (TXCC)= $975,000

Disclosure (“none” means no position):

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

The Week’s Top Insider Buys

Deal volume by dollar amount.

Helix Energy Solutions Group Inc (HLX)= $9,999,849
Oragenics Inc (ONI)= $2,501,001
Synovus Financial Corp (SNV)= $2,064,314
Cbeyond Inc (CBEY)= $2,013,255
Emeritus Corp (ESC)= $1,606,337
Great Wolf Resorts Inc (WOLF)= $1,581,181
Marathon Acquisition Corp (MAQ)= $1,567,529
Neuro Hitech Inc (NHPI)= $1,260,000
General Electric Co (GE)= $1,049,650
Crescent Financial Corp (CRFN)= $1,014,070
Transwitch Corp (TXCC)= $975,000

Disclosure (“none” means no position):

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

ADM Quietly Becoming Largest Commodity Trading Player

Forget ethanol and HFCS. Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) is quietly becoming the largest commodity trade clearer.

Futures clearing services provider ADM Investor Services Inc., a subsidiary of Archer Daniels Midland Co., said Friday it has agreed to acquire the customer business and technologies of Iowa Grain Co. Iowa Grain is a clearing member of the Chicago Board of Trade and a member of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange.

“With the increased volatility in the global futures markets, it’s important to have a large and stable capital base, which this transaction will provide,” said Iowa Grain President and Chief Executive Mike Brinati.

The companies said the combination will produce a financially stable futures commission merchant with efficient access to trading platforms and electronic trading facilities.

If we remember back to the last earnings release we remember the huge results in the Agricultural Services Division.

Results were driven by an almost sevenfold increase in profits at ADM’s Agricultural Services division, from $46 million to $366 million. The division includes the company’s grain-trading, -transporting and -handling businesses.

The Iowa purchase is just adding revenues and customers to that business. When you consider the amount of grain ADM handles and stores, further expansion into trading in the current environment is a natural and very profitable move. To fully see the scope of what we are talking about here, look at this map.

Commodity markets have exploded and with them has the trading in them. As a leading clearer of trades, ADM stands to profit no matter what the markets do, as long as there is action.

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long ADM

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Weekend Reading at VIN

Here are the week’s best at Value Investing News

16. Todd Sullivan’s – ValuePlays: Buffett in Wachovia?

(via valueplays.blogspot.com)

Not so fast

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Dow Chemical & Owens Corning….hmmmm

Recent news got me to thinking….

First this:
“Dow Building Solutions (DBS), a market-facing business unit of The Dow Chemical Company (DOW), announced that it has signed an agreement to acquire Stevens® Roofing Systems and Geomembrane Systems, a business of JPS Industries, Inc. Based in Holyoke, Mass., Stevens® Roofing Systems manufactures reinforced thermoplastic (TPO) commercial roofing systems, an area with significant growth potential that aligns well with Dow’s energy efficient building expertise. Pending the transaction close, Dow plans to operate the acquired business as Dow Roofing Systems LLC. Financial terms were not disclosed. Regulatory approval is not required, and the transaction is expected to close within 30 days.

Dow Building Solutions’ participation in the commercial construction market centers around creating energy efficient structures, including insulation, weatherization systems and exterior wall systems. Stevens® is an innovator and a recognized leader in TPO single-ply roofing systems for commercial and industrial applications. The planned acquisition adds Stevens®’ commercial roofing expertise to Dow’s building science know-how, insulation and polymer technology expertise to deliver comprehensive solutions in this rapidly-growing industry segment.”

Then this news:
Special-Situations Hedge Fund Harbinger Capital Partners has taken a stake in Owens Corning (OC). Since late April, Harbinger has spent $57.46 million purchasing 2.6 million (almost 2%) shares of Owens Corning on the open market at prices ranging from $20.56 to $23.96 each.

Harbinger may be think that like Sherwin Williams (SWH), Owens Corning (OC) is very cheap based on its long term earning potential, its market share and brand recognition.

In my recent conversation with Dow CEO Andrew Liveris we spoke about Dow’s M&A prospects.

While the large “transformational deal” ($10 billion plus) most want is unlikely (and unwanted from this author’s perspective) Liveris did say the scores of smaller deals were likely. Owens, with a market cap of $3 billion would fit into that frame. With $9.5 billion coming in Q4 and the roughly $3 billion already in the bank. The deal is easily doable.

Now, OC has put it asbestos litigation behind it and has successfully transformed it earnings profile to 60% international with it composites purchase recently. Both the composite, fiberglass insulation and roofing businesses do have some symbiosis with Dow businesses so cost savings would be available. It would also immediately vault Dow Building Solutions into a market leader.

The best part? The price. Like everything that has anything to do with housing or any kind, Owens share price has been hit, down 30% over the past year. Andrew Liveris, is, a value investor. He is also the best kind, a patient one. Owens right now represents value and more earnings diversification for the company. It also, now, finally, represents and international presence.

By the end of the year about 1/3 of Dow’s market cap will be cash. Expect buybacks and dividend increases and small purchases. Owens is larger than “small” but still could easily work.

Just a thought…….

Disclosure (“none” means no position):

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

CSX / TCI Court Documnents and Thoughts on "Disclosure"

Not sure if anyone has seen thins but it is a must read.

Judge Lewis Kaplan opens with Read the whole document at the link:
“Some people deliberately go close to the line dividing legal from illegal if they seea sufficient opportunity for profit in doing so. A few cross that line and, if caught, seek to justify their actions on the basis of formalistic arguments even when it is apparent that they have defeated the purpose of the law.

This is such a case. The defendants – two hedge funds that seek extraordinary gain,
sometimes through “shareholder activism” – amassed a large economic position in CSX Corporation (“CSX”), one of the nation’s largest railroads. They did so for the purpose of causing CSX to behave in a manner that they hoped would lead to a rise in the value of their holdings. And there is nothing wrong with that. But they did so in close coordination with each other and without making the public disclosure required of 5 percent shareholders and groups by the Williams Act, a statute that
was enacted to ensure that other shareholders are informed of such accumulations and arrangements.

They now have launched a proxy fight that, if successful, would result in their having substantial influence and perhaps practical working control of CSX. Defendants seek to defend their secret accumulation of interests in CSX by invoking
what they assert is the letter of the law. Much of their position in CSX was in the form of total return equity swaps (“TRSs”), a type of derivative that gave defendants substantially all of the indicia of stock ownership save the formal legal right to vote the shares. In consequence, they argue, they did not beneficially own the shares referenced by the swaps and thus were not obliged to disclose sooner
or more fully than they did. In a like vein, they contend that they did not reach a formal agreement to act together, and therefore did not become a “group” required to disclose its collaborative activities, until December 2007 despite the fact that they began acting in concert with respect to CSX far earlier. But these contentions are not sufficient to justify defendants’ actions.”

This is a must read because it goes to disclosure. Hedge funds are constantly all over management (for the good of all) to be more transparent. But actions such as those by TCI, while technically legal, smack of hypocrisy. The same goes to short sellers who are short but refuse to disclose how short they are because “they are not legally required to”.

Disclosure is disclosure and if it is good for some it has to be good for all. It cannot be a piece by piece game. Personally I think if you can be short through ownership of puts and be forced to disclose it then if you have sold shares short you ought to be forced to disclose it also.

If you are acquiring interest via swaps, the same ought to hold. On cannot hold the management of a company to a higher standard than themselves and then stand their a “tisk tisk” management for not “disclosing fully”.

Disclosure (“none” means no position):None

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

It's Friday, So Let's Play With Macalope

It is time to play “MacSemantics” this Friday

This one gets even sillier:

First as always, Macalope’s “piece”:

Mac graciously does a mea-culpa here: “Todd starts by rightly dinging the horny one for failing to note that he did say Jobs did not actually go so far as to literally say iPhone purchasers were suckers, even though Todd put it in quotes. So the Macalope will agree he shouldn’t have bothered making an issue of that particular point.”

Then we degenerate to more Macgames:

“[Commenter colonelpanic points out that Todd is calculating off a different base by going back to the iPhone’s original price, so his number don’t jibe with Gizmodo’s or the Macalope’s. Some of this may be confusion over the Macalope’s use of “original iPhone” to mean the original hardware at the May 2008 price. The Macalope has already conceded that the price drop from the iPhone’s launch price to the price as of three weeks ago was necessary to stay competitive, the point is that Steve Jobs effectively announced no real price drop at WWDC, contrary to Sullivan’s posts of last Monday. Todd’s trying to reset the goal posts to justify his contention that the iPhone 3G is “cheaper”. Sure, it’s cheaper than it was last July, but it’s not cheaper than it was three weeks ago.] “

Now, what was the post from your truly that started all this? Anyone remember?

Wasn’t it “$199 3G iphone……Job’s Admits Early iPhone Buyers “Suckers” ?. Didn’t I then go on to talk about those who “waited in line for days” for a phone? Didn’t I also then talk about “those of us who laughed when the phone was priced at $499”? Isn’t the genesis of all the my assertions since two months before the phone was even launched that a price drop of this magnitude was necessary?

Wasn’t the first sentence “How stupid do those folks who slept outside for days for a phone feel? They could have waited a year, got a better phone from apple (AAPL) for 1/3 the price….”

Now Mac, excuse us for thinking when you actually said “original price” that you actually meant the “original price”. Silly, silly us. We should know you meant “the price that makes whatever argument I am making correct”.

While your at it, we could just as easily give you GB$500 pounds and in that case after the exchange rate, if you force me to use dollars for the new phone and you use the pounds for your old one, you could make out even better. I mean, as long as we are just doing more “Apple twisting”.

It is nice of you to admit that when one bases his assertion off the original price like I have done since day one that, that person would be 100% correct.

The rest of his post is reduced to some mildly amusing pseudo insult I can only imagine was done to hide the fact he has already admitted on two occasion I was in fact, based on the metrics I used, correct?

Mac post basically says “Sure you are right if you go by what you said, but you are wrong if you go by what I wanted (wished, hoped, tried to make people think) you said”

OK…..Good to know

Perhaps maybe if Mac spent a little more (or any) time writing original stuff rather than just sitting there picking at the work of others, he could avoid this?

Just a thought…

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Sold Apple July $280 calls in Jan.

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

It’s Friday, So Let’s Play With Macalope

It is time to play “MacSemantics” this Friday

This one gets even sillier:

First as always, Macalope’s “piece”:

Mac graciously does a mea-culpa here: “Todd starts by rightly dinging the horny one for failing to note that he did say Jobs did not actually go so far as to literally say iPhone purchasers were suckers, even though Todd put it in quotes. So the Macalope will agree he shouldn’t have bothered making an issue of that particular point.”

Then we degenerate to more Macgames:

“[Commenter colonelpanic points out that Todd is calculating off a different base by going back to the iPhone’s original price, so his number don’t jibe with Gizmodo’s or the Macalope’s. Some of this may be confusion over the Macalope’s use of “original iPhone” to mean the original hardware at the May 2008 price. The Macalope has already conceded that the price drop from the iPhone’s launch price to the price as of three weeks ago was necessary to stay competitive, the point is that Steve Jobs effectively announced no real price drop at WWDC, contrary to Sullivan’s posts of last Monday. Todd’s trying to reset the goal posts to justify his contention that the iPhone 3G is “cheaper”. Sure, it’s cheaper than it was last July, but it’s not cheaper than it was three weeks ago.] “

Now, what was the post from your truly that started all this? Anyone remember?

Wasn’t it “$199 3G iphone……Job’s Admits Early iPhone Buyers “Suckers” ?. Didn’t I then go on to talk about those who “waited in line for days” for a phone? Didn’t I also then talk about “those of us who laughed when the phone was priced at $499”? Isn’t the genesis of all the my assertions since two months before the phone was even launched that a price drop of this magnitude was necessary?

Wasn’t the first sentence “How stupid do those folks who slept outside for days for a phone feel? They could have waited a year, got a better phone from apple (AAPL) for 1/3 the price….”

Now Mac, excuse us for thinking when you actually said “original price” that you actually meant the “original price”. Silly, silly us. We should know you meant “the price that makes whatever argument I am making correct”.

While your at it, we could just as easily give you GB$500 pounds and in that case after the exchange rate, if you force me to use dollars for the new phone and you use the pounds for your old one, you could make out even better. I mean, as long as we are just doing more “Apple twisting”.

It is nice of you to admit that when one bases his assertion off the original price like I have done since day one that, that person would be 100% correct.

The rest of his post is reduced to some mildly amusing pseudo insult I can only imagine was done to hide the fact he has already admitted on two occasion I was in fact, based on the metrics I used, correct?

Mac post basically says “Sure you are right if you go by what you said, but you are wrong if you go by what I wanted (wished, hoped, tried to make people think) you said”

OK…..Good to know

Perhaps maybe if Mac spent a little more (or any) time writing original stuff rather than just sitting there picking at the work of others, he could avoid this?

Just a thought…

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Sold Apple July $280 calls in Jan.

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Friday's Links

Yahoo, ESL, Whitworth, Starbucks

– Yahoo goes after a blogger…

– Lampert’s holdings

– At least he owns a bunch of the company he is helping to ruin

– Took long enough

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books