Based on news reports, Starbucks may just finally be seeing reality.
Starbucks (SBUX) reported net income for the second quarter of $108.7 million or $0.15 per share, compared to $150.8 million or $0.19 per share for the year-ago quarter or $208.1 million or $0.28 per share. Operating income for the second quarter fell 26% to $178.2 million or 7.1% of revenue from to $241.0 million or 10.7% of revenue in the prior year. Decreased consumer traffic resulted in a mid-single-digit decline in U.S. same-store sales.
Now, most of knew this was coming no matter how long management denied it both to themselves and in public. The question is, “what are you going to do about it”?
For a while I have been saying an ax needed to be taken to expansion plans. It seems management may finally be acquiescing.
Management lowered U.S. store opening targets for fiscal 2008 to about 1,020 net new stores from its previously lowered target of 1,175. International store openings are expected to remain as previously announced at 975 stores. The company still expects capital expenditures for fiscal year 2008 to be about $1.1 billion.
Here is the good part. They then said they plan to open significantly fewer new stores in the U.S. over the 2009 to 2011 period to less than 400 net new stores per year. However, they plan to continue to accelerate the International unit expansion, targeting net new store openings of 1,050 in 2009, 1,150 in 2010, and 1,300 in 2011. They said total store count will be about 21,500 stores by the end of fiscal 2011, with its international presence growing from about 30% to over 40%.
This, in conjunction with the new drinks planned are steps in the right direction, if executed properly.
Does it mean shares are a buy? No. If the new drinks are $5 a pop they will flop and more pain is in store. If the economy stays flat and Starbucks rigidly sticks to US expansion and pricing plans, more negative stores comps are coming.
At least they are acknowledging the need to change. But, acknowledging it and actually executing it properly are two very different things. Based on the past year, proof is needed before investing.
If Schultz wants to be the high priced alternative in the market, fine, just do not promise investors 18% EPS growth in the current environment. It gives people the impression either you do not know what is going on out there are are lying. Neither is a good one.
Disclosure (“none” means no position):None
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.