Davidson on Housing
- Posted by ToddSullivan
- on June 29th, 2011
“Davidson” submits:
Understanding the market does not come from the “Top Down” view, but from the “Bottom Up”. As Doug Yearley, Toll Brothers CEO, says here consolidating all information as a reflection of one major theme often leads to misconstruing important trends. The true meaning is in the details.
Scott Grannis provided the chart in his June 28, 2011 economic commentary. http://scottgrannis.blogspot.com/ There has been much recent concern with a “2nd Dip” which has come from a recent drop in foreclosed home prices. Radar Logic reported yesterday a rise in home prices signaling a possible counter trend. My interpretation is that the push by banks to unload foreclosed homes means that they are now strong enough to be able to accept the losses, but because the effect of distressed homes is currently larger, consolidated housing price indices have declined the past several months. Distressed homes are in some instances not even livable due to looting of appliances, plumbing, heating/cooling and electrical systems and should never be consolidated with “livable” dwellings. But, these indices are not constructed with this level of detail.
The most important informational trends are lost by consolidating all data series without regard to the specific meaning of each.
One can develop a better understanding of the actual economic trends by monitoring the commentary of highly qualified CEOs within the specific industry. One such CEO is Douglas C. Yearley, Toll Brothers CEO. Yearley says in the Toll Brothers May 25, 2011 2Q2011 report:
“Still, many potential buyers have deferred their purchase decisions due to concerns over the direction of the economy and
media headlines suggesting that all home prices continue to decline. We question the many studies quoted in the media that
combine distressed sales data, including foreclosures and short sales, with nondistressed home sales data. We believe that
averaging distressed and non-distressed sales data provides a misleading picture to the public regarding home price direction.
In contrast to these reports, according to a CoreLogic® study, prices for nondistressed existing sales are up 3% in 2011’s first
quarter — the most since they started to decline in 2006 — versus down 12% for distressed sales. We are experiencing
flat to slightly increasing pricing in most of our markets. As consumers better understand that prices are firming, we believe
they will gain confidence, which will help release some of the pent-up demand that must be building in the market.”I interpret the fact that new home prices are higher while bank selling has increased is a sign of economic strength, not weakness! One should always carefully examine the separate details which are consolidated in any “Top Down” view.
To see more posts on any of the companies mentioned in this article, enter their stock ticker symbol in the search box.
The information in this blog post represents my own opinions and does not contain a recommendation for any particular security or investment. I or my affiliates may hold positions or other interests in securities mentioned in the Blog, please see my Disclaimer page for my full disclaimer.
-
Todd's investing strategy is essentially long with the rare short. He seeks to buy undervalued issues with an upcoming catalyst that will help them realized.... More »
-
Archives
-
Tag Cloud
acas ackman adgf aig AN bac BAM bbep BBI bgp BPO buffett CC CODi CRE davidson dow einhorn employment ETFC f fairx figi ggp hhc housing IGOI jcp jmba joe mcd mgm MO oesx pld PM rail rexi sbux seth klarman SHLD spg theory VIC xom
WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck and Luke Morton requires Flash Player 9 or better.
Recent Comments
- Recession ?? | ValuePlays on Whoa…..Temp Employment
- The Ethics of Analysts | Josh Maher's Blog on The Salesforce “Analysts” Call…..A Circle Jerk
- Dow Chemical Results Show Signs of Economic Boom | ValueWalk on Carlisle Results Counter “EU Recession” Talk
- Remember That $50B Suit That The NY Times Said Would “Wreck Havoc” on BAC??….It Settled for $20M | ValuePlays on Subs: Why The $50B Bank of America Suit Will Settle
- $50B Suit NYT Claimed would 'Wreck Havoc' on BAC Settles for $20M | ValueWalk on NY Times Misleads on Latest Bank of America Litigation
-
