Categories
Articles

Greenspan’s Surreal Defense

What is Greenspan doing? Ben Franklin once said “better to be thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt”. Greenspan’s constant rhetoric is inviting a far closer scrutiny of his record and actions than would have happened had he just kept quite.

After his retirement in 2006, rather than just fading away and enjoying the years he has left, the 82 year old Greenspan decided he was going to become an author and prognosticator. His actions both spooked markets as the ordinarily unintelligible coded verbiage he used as Fed Head suddenly became crystal clear. Statements like prediction a recession with percentages of probabilities and criticisms of current head Ben Bernanke’s actions stunned investors and did nothing but add volatility to an already volatile market.

His ill-timed tomb in the midst of a crisis immediately after he left office did nothing but give those searching for a reason for it 1,000 pages of possibilities.

In the book he then went on the further denigrate his credibility when he wrote about Republican’s tax cutting as adding to the current environment. During Greenspan’s rein he was largely criticized by Democrats for his constant endorsement of tax cuts as an economic stimulus.

Now the critics attack Greenspan for being too lax on regulation and keeping rate far to low for far to long. On the first I cannot attack him. More regulation has never stopped abuses in the system. The reason is that determined people will always find a way around regulation and bubble will always exist somewhere. You cannot regulate away stupidity and yes, people who jump at “liar loans” were stupid. At least they were not as stupid as those who gave them the money.

If anything, more regulation does tend to stifle enthusiasm and innovation. Some innovation will be good and others bad, but without it, things do stagnate.

On the second charge Greenspan is guilty. Free money, given out for a long time, and that was what is was, will cause people to do dumb things with it, and they did.

One thing struck me recently. In a recent interview with the WSJ, Mr. Greenspan says he doesn’t regret a single decision. That is just not possible…

He did a job for 18 years and would not do anything different? That strikes me as an arrogance I have not seem in quite some time. Ever heard of self reflection? Greenspan is essentially saying he was perfect, either that or he is lying.

Even two members of the policy- making FOMC at the time (2004-2006) — William Poole and Robert Parry, presidents of the Federal Reserve Banks of St. Louis and San Francisco, have both recently argued that, in hindsight, rates were too low for too long. They both say this contributed to the housing bubble. On that Greenspan says, “I don’t remember a case when the process by which the decision making at the Federal Reserve failed”. He focuses not on events that followed the policy but on the thinking behind it. In other words, good intention trump bad results…

In the same interview he said “I was praised for things I didn’t do,” and “I am now being blamed for things that I didn’t do.” The question was not asked but I would love to know what things he got credit for he now thinks he did not deserve.

What Greenspan is doing is giving his critics fodder to attack him and his “would not change a thing” comment will lead him to defend decisions that were wrong (no one is perfect). This defense will taint all the decisions he made as a skeptical eye will now be cast over everything.

Alan, Ben had a point…

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

Greenspan's Surreal Defense

What is Greenspan doing? Ben Franklin once said “better to be thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt”. Greenspan’s constant rhetoric is inviting a far closer scrutiny of his record and actions than would have happened had he just kept quite.

After his retirement in 2006, rather than just fading away and enjoying the years he has left, the 82 year old Greenspan decided he was going to become an author and prognosticator. His actions both spooked markets as the ordinarily unintelligible coded verbiage he used as Fed Head suddenly became crystal clear. Statements like prediction a recession with percentages of probabilities and criticisms of current head Ben Bernanke’s actions stunned investors and did nothing but add volatility to an already volatile market.

His ill-timed tomb in the midst of a crisis immediately after he left office did nothing but give those searching for a reason for it 1,000 pages of possibilities.

In the book he then went on the further denigrate his credibility when he wrote about Republican’s tax cutting as adding to the current environment. During Greenspan’s rein he was largely criticized by Democrats for his constant endorsement of tax cuts as an economic stimulus.

Now the critics attack Greenspan for being too lax on regulation and keeping rate far to low for far to long. On the first I cannot attack him. More regulation has never stopped abuses in the system. The reason is that determined people will always find a way around regulation and bubble will always exist somewhere. You cannot regulate away stupidity and yes, people who jump at “liar loans” were stupid. At least they were not as stupid as those who gave them the money.

If anything, more regulation does tend to stifle enthusiasm and innovation. Some innovation will be good and others bad, but without it, things do stagnate.

On the second charge Greenspan is guilty. Free money, given out for a long time, and that was what is was, will cause people to do dumb things with it, and they did.

One thing struck me recently. In a recent interview with the WSJ, Mr. Greenspan says he doesn’t regret a single decision. That is just not possible…

He did a job for 18 years and would not do anything different? That strikes me as an arrogance I have not seem in quite some time. Ever heard of self reflection? Greenspan is essentially saying he was perfect, either that or he is lying.

Even two members of the policy- making FOMC at the time (2004-2006) — William Poole and Robert Parry, presidents of the Federal Reserve Banks of St. Louis and San Francisco, have both recently argued that, in hindsight, rates were too low for too long. They both say this contributed to the housing bubble. On that Greenspan says, “I don’t remember a case when the process by which the decision making at the Federal Reserve failed”. He focuses not on events that followed the policy but on the thinking behind it. In other words, good intention trump bad results…

In the same interview he said “I was praised for things I didn’t do,” and “I am now being blamed for things that I didn’t do.” The question was not asked but I would love to know what things he got credit for he now thinks he did not deserve.

What Greenspan is doing is giving his critics fodder to attack him and his “would not change a thing” comment will lead him to defend decisions that were wrong (no one is perfect). This defense will taint all the decisions he made as a skeptical eye will now be cast over everything.

Alan, Ben had a point…

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

Home Depot’s Job Cuts: What Took so Long?

When I first read this yesterday I thought, “good idea”. After a minute or so I then thought, “what?”.

Home Depot (HD) announced yesterday that there will no longer be a Human Resource manager and Human Resource Supervisor in every one of the 1,970 U.S. stores it owns.

The change will affect about 2,200 employees and will result in about 1,000 job cuts.

They really had both a HR manager and supervisor at each location? Really? I can’t find anyone to help me in the paint department but it would seem there is a HR person there for employees at all hours to answer the two or three questions a month that may come up.

The problem here is that this may be indicative of the fat and waste that is still there despite the downward spiral in results for the past year and a half. I have worked in the past for companies that had multiple locations and not a one had HR managers at each of the locations.

Now HD will have 230 District Teams that will shoulder the HR duties. This is the set up I would be willing to bet 90% of corporate America has (still may be a bit too heavy). It also speaks to additional issues. If HD has gone to this length to communicate with employees at the store level and have someone there for immediate response to questions the fact that employee moral is so low is really shocking.

It means that either these people were not trained properly or that the policies enacted are so poor, efforts to right the ship are going to have to be extraordinary to fix it now that the immediate contact will be gone.

Now, HD has cut corporate HQ staff level in order to concentrate on customer service. But, aren’t most of our customer service complaints due to dealing with unhappy, poorly trained employees? If they can’t fix that issue with HR in the building, one has to question their ability to do it when they are removed…

Disclosure (“none” means no position):None

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

Home Depot's Job Cuts: What Took so Long?

When I first read this yesterday I thought, “good idea”. After a minute or so I then thought, “what?”.

Home Depot (HD) announced yesterday that there will no longer be a Human Resource manager and Human Resource Supervisor in every one of the 1,970 U.S. stores it owns.

The change will affect about 2,200 employees and will result in about 1,000 job cuts.

They really had both a HR manager and supervisor at each location? Really? I can’t find anyone to help me in the paint department but it would seem there is a HR person there for employees at all hours to answer the two or three questions a month that may come up.

The problem here is that this may be indicative of the fat and waste that is still there despite the downward spiral in results for the past year and a half. I have worked in the past for companies that had multiple locations and not a one had HR managers at each of the locations.

Now HD will have 230 District Teams that will shoulder the HR duties. This is the set up I would be willing to bet 90% of corporate America has (still may be a bit too heavy). It also speaks to additional issues. If HD has gone to this length to communicate with employees at the store level and have someone there for immediate response to questions the fact that employee moral is so low is really shocking.

It means that either these people were not trained properly or that the policies enacted are so poor, efforts to right the ship are going to have to be extraordinary to fix it now that the immediate contact will be gone.

Now, HD has cut corporate HQ staff level in order to concentrate on customer service. But, aren’t most of our customer service complaints due to dealing with unhappy, poorly trained employees? If they can’t fix that issue with HR in the building, one has to question their ability to do it when they are removed…

Disclosure (“none” means no position):None

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

Tuesday’s Upgrades and Downgrades


Upgrades
Huntsman (HUN)- BB&T Capital Mkts Hold » Buy
Sepracor (SEPR)- AmTech Research Neutral » Buy
NVIDIA (NVDA)- AmTech Research Neutral » Buy
Massey Energy (MEE)- Caris & Company Above Average » Buy
Colnl BancGrp (CNB)- Stifel Nicolaus Sell » Hold
Orthofix (OFIX)- Leerink Swann Mkt Perform » Outperform
Lincoln Electric (LECO)- BB&T Capital Mkts Hold » Buy
Apple (AAPL)- Thomas Weisel Market Weight » Overweight
Westlake Chemical (WLK)- UBS Neutral » Buy
ComScore (SCOR)- Jefferies & Co Hold » Buy
Novellus (NVLS)- Lehman Brothers Underweight » Equal-weight
Temple-Inland (TIN)- Citigroup Hold » Buy
KLA-Tencor (KLAC)- Citigroup Hold » Buy

Downgrades
Power Integrations (POWI)- Needham & Co Strong Buy » Buy
Cirrus Logic (CRUS)- Needham & Co Buy » Hold
Emulex (ELX)- Wachovia Outperform » Mkt Perform
Vignette (VIGN)- Roth Capital Buy » Hold
Aruba Networks (ARUN)- JP Morgan Neutral » Underweight
AnnTaylor (ANN)- Piper Jaffray Buy » Neutral
Applied Materials (AMAT)- Credit Suisse Outperform » Neutral
Ocean Power Tech (OPTT)- Bear Stearns Outperform » Underperform
Columbia Sportswear (COLM)- Citigroup Hold » Sell
Nortel (NT)- Robert W. Baird Outperform » Neutral
Amkor (AMKR)- Lehman Brothers Overweight » Equal-weight
TJX Cos (TJX)- Citigroup Buy » Hold
Hartford Financial (HIG)- UBS Buy » Neutral
Estee Lauder (EL)- UBS Buy » Neutral
MGM Mirage (MGM)- Oppenheimer Outperform » Perform

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

Tuesday's Upgrades and Downgrades


Upgrades
Huntsman (HUN)- BB&T Capital Mkts Hold » Buy
Sepracor (SEPR)- AmTech Research Neutral » Buy
NVIDIA (NVDA)- AmTech Research Neutral » Buy
Massey Energy (MEE)- Caris & Company Above Average » Buy
Colnl BancGrp (CNB)- Stifel Nicolaus Sell » Hold
Orthofix (OFIX)- Leerink Swann Mkt Perform » Outperform
Lincoln Electric (LECO)- BB&T Capital Mkts Hold » Buy
Apple (AAPL)- Thomas Weisel Market Weight » Overweight
Westlake Chemical (WLK)- UBS Neutral » Buy
ComScore (SCOR)- Jefferies & Co Hold » Buy
Novellus (NVLS)- Lehman Brothers Underweight » Equal-weight
Temple-Inland (TIN)- Citigroup Hold » Buy
KLA-Tencor (KLAC)- Citigroup Hold » Buy

Downgrades
Power Integrations (POWI)- Needham & Co Strong Buy » Buy
Cirrus Logic (CRUS)- Needham & Co Buy » Hold
Emulex (ELX)- Wachovia Outperform » Mkt Perform
Vignette (VIGN)- Roth Capital Buy » Hold
Aruba Networks (ARUN)- JP Morgan Neutral » Underweight
AnnTaylor (ANN)- Piper Jaffray Buy » Neutral
Applied Materials (AMAT)- Credit Suisse Outperform » Neutral
Ocean Power Tech (OPTT)- Bear Stearns Outperform » Underperform
Columbia Sportswear (COLM)- Citigroup Hold » Sell
Nortel (NT)- Robert W. Baird Outperform » Neutral
Amkor (AMKR)- Lehman Brothers Overweight » Equal-weight
TJX Cos (TJX)- Citigroup Buy » Hold
Hartford Financial (HIG)- UBS Buy » Neutral
Estee Lauder (EL)- UBS Buy » Neutral
MGM Mirage (MGM)- Oppenheimer Outperform » Perform

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

"Fast Money" for Tuesday


Tueday’s Picks
Jeff Macke like Microsoft (MSFT) $29.16

Karen Finerman recommends Goldman Sachs (GS) $178.73

Pete Najarian thinks Chesapeake Energy (CHK) $47.03 is a buy.

Take profits in US Steel (X) $143.72 , says Guy Adami.

Monday’s Results
Jeff Macke likes Microsoft (MSFT) $29.16 Close $29.16 PUSH

Guy Adami prefers Merck (MRK) $40.0 Close $40.78 GAIN

Pete Najarian thinks Energy Conversion Devices (ENER) $33.24 is a buy. Close $32.16 LOSS

2008 Records:
Brian Schaeffer= 0-1
Carter Worth= 0-1
Jon Najarian= 4-1
Jeff Macke= 25-17-1
Tim Seymore= 14-8
Guy Adami= 24-22
Pete Najarian= 26-20
Karen Finerman= 19-23-1
Joe Terrenova= 1-1

2007 Results (Since 6/21):
Guy Adami= 58-46 = 56%
Jeff Macke= 60-40 = 60%
Pete Najarian= 49-41 = 54%

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

Sears’ Nifty Purchase

Even I missed this one until alerted by a reader…..

Footstar Inc. (OTC:FTAR) is selling its footwear license to Sears Holdings (SHLD) for $13 million in preparation for winding down its business at the end of the year. Footstar agreed to sell substantially all of its intellectual property to Sears, including the intellectual property related to Sears’ Kmart business.

Footstar operates roughly 1,300 licensed footwear departments at Kmart under a contract set to expire at the end of 2008. They also operate licensed footwear departments in 859 Rite Aid Corporation stores located on the West Coast. Brands under Footstar’s operations include Thom McAn, Cobbie Cuddlers and Texas Steer — which are company owned — and Route 66 and Basic Editions. Kmart-licensed footwear departments account for substantially all of its $630 million in sales and $53 million operating profit. Kmart has begun to hire several employees from Footstar and has promised employment to almost all current management.

So, for $13 million Lampert has saved Sears essentially $53 million annually (the profits Footstar received from Kmart). Not a bad return….

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long SHLD

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

Sears' Nifty Purchase

Even I missed this one until alerted by a reader…..

Footstar Inc. (OTC:FTAR) is selling its footwear license to Sears Holdings (SHLD) for $13 million in preparation for winding down its business at the end of the year. Footstar agreed to sell substantially all of its intellectual property to Sears, including the intellectual property related to Sears’ Kmart business.

Footstar operates roughly 1,300 licensed footwear departments at Kmart under a contract set to expire at the end of 2008. They also operate licensed footwear departments in 859 Rite Aid Corporation stores located on the West Coast. Brands under Footstar’s operations include Thom McAn, Cobbie Cuddlers and Texas Steer — which are company owned — and Route 66 and Basic Editions. Kmart-licensed footwear departments account for substantially all of its $630 million in sales and $53 million operating profit. Kmart has begun to hire several employees from Footstar and has promised employment to almost all current management.

So, for $13 million Lampert has saved Sears essentially $53 million annually (the profits Footstar received from Kmart). Not a bad return….

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long SHLD

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

Monday’s Links

Deal.com, Barrons on Whitman, Ohio AG, Hmmmmm

– Thank you for the mention…..

– Barron’s did a nice piece over the weekend on Marty Whitman.

– What is wrong with these guys?

– Now, where did we read this story before? Maybe, here?

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

Monday's Links

Deal.com, Barrons on Whitman, Ohio AG, Hmmmmm

– Thank you for the mention…..

– Barron’s did a nice piece over the weekend on Marty Whitman.

– What is wrong with these guys?

– Now, where did we read this story before? Maybe, here?

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

Borders Gets New Deal with Ackman

This is really good news for shareholders…

Here are the new terms:

* A lower interest rate of 9.8% on the $42.5 million senior secured term loan. The original Pershing Square financing commitment carried a 12.5% interest rate.

* An increased backstop purchase offer (“put”) of $135 million for the international subsidiaries. The original Pershing Square financing commitment included a purchase obligation at a price of $125 million. As previously stated, Borders Group believes its international subsidiaries are worth substantially more than the amended backstop purchase offer price and the company has retained the right to continue its ongoing strategic alternatives process for these businesses.

* A reduction in the number of warrants issued at closing to Pershing Square to 9.55 million warrants to purchase company common stock at $7.00 per share and a reduction in the term of all warrants issued to Pershing Square from 7.5 years to 6.5 years. The original Pershing Square financing commitment included 14.7 million in up-front warrants at $7.00 per share. Under the new agreement, Borders Group is required to issue an additional 5.15 million warrants to Pershing Square if any of the following three conditions occurs: the company exercises the put related to the sale of the international subsidiaries, a definitive agreement relating to a change-of-control of the company is not signed by October 1, 2008, or the company terminates the strategic alternatives process.

“We are pleased to have reached a final financing agreement with Pershing Square that includes more advantageous terms and still provides Borders with the necessary funding to continue implementing our key initiatives,” said Borders Group Chief Executive Officer George Jones. “The process of reviewing alternative financing proposals over the past two weeks was beneficial as it yielded an outcome that is better for our company and our shareholders. We are pleased to have the backing of Pershing Square, our largest shareholder, as we move forward and we appreciate their continued confidence. Borders is now turning its focus to the broader strategic alternatives process.”

Essentially Ackman has told the company “I’ve got your back. Go get any offer you can and I will make you a better one.” This really does illustrate the belief ha has in the prospects for the company. It also shows us how bad he wants to keep control of it. Rather than let a third party come in and stake a claim, he has given the company the latitude to shop for deal that he will willingly beat. Good…

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long BGP

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

"Discretionary" Harley’s? Not So Fast

There has been a flurry of posts flying around lately about Harley Davidson (HOG) and their status as a “discretionary” purchase. Now, while the choice to buy a motorcycle may be for some, riding a Harley is not necessarily. There is a huge segment of the Harley population that considers their cars their second mode of transportation.

I am reminded of a story told to me by a friend. His buddy called him and said he was bringing over his new Harley for him to see. As my friend came out to look at it, his buddy’s wife was sitting on the back of the bike. “Isn’t she the most beautiful thing you have ever seen?” he was asked. My friend then looked at me and said, “He was of course talking about the bike”. Ever here a story about that from a Mac user? Or a Ford (F) driver? Me either…

I think the confusion here may be based on the term “discretionary”. When I think of the word I think of mowing my lawn myself vs. having the kid down the street do it. Buying Coke (KO) or buying the generic store bought brand of soda. Going to the movies vs. waiting for it to come out and renting it. Those are truly discretionary purchases.

A Harley Davidson rider will never, ever, make the decision to NOT buy a Harley and instead hop on a Suzuki to “save a few bucks”. That very fact means there is a very large limit to just how discretionary the bikes are.

More “misinformation” is also bantered about that people do not have the money to spend “15k to 30K” for a bike. Now, I have been to a dealership lately and I can tell you there is a whole swath of bikes available for $8,000 to $12,000. That alone makes the potential affordability of it audience wider.

Now, all this is not to say that for some people the bike is discretionary. I as much said so last year when share were trading at all time high’s near $70. Shares have since cratered and sit under $40. Slowing sales and rising credit issues are the main culprits.

What has happened is Harley riders has slowed to rate at which the “trade up” their bikes to bigger, more expensive models. They have not decided to go with another brand. Were Harleys truly discretionary, this would be the trend. Rather than trading in an existing bike for another, riders are sticking with what they have. This is the reason recently the observation was made that the secondary market has remained so strong. The demand for the bikes is still there, people are just being more selective in their purchases.

Let’s not forget that this brand is so powerful people tattoo its logo on their skin. Ever see Google (GOOG) or Apple (AAPL) tattooed on anyone? We know how passionate those folks are about their products, yet it would seem they pale to those who ride HOG’s. You cannot both put a price tag on this and underestimate the power of the brand in people decision making process.

This passion means there is an in-elasticity to the “discretionary” aspect of the bikes. If that is true, and I believe it is, then we may have reached the limit of it and shares have bottomed. That is why I bought earlier in the year…

Another note: As expected, the labor issue has been put to rest.

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long HOG, None

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

"Discretionary" Harley's? Not So Fast

There has been a flurry of posts flying around lately about Harley Davidson (HOG) and their status as a “discretionary” purchase. Now, while the choice to buy a motorcycle may be for some, riding a Harley is not necessarily. There is a huge segment of the Harley population that considers their cars their second mode of transportation.

I am reminded of a story told to me by a friend. His buddy called him and said he was bringing over his new Harley for him to see. As my friend came out to look at it, his buddy’s wife was sitting on the back of the bike. “Isn’t she the most beautiful thing you have ever seen?” he was asked. My friend then looked at me and said, “He was of course talking about the bike”. Ever here a story about that from a Mac user? Or a Ford (F) driver? Me either…

I think the confusion here may be based on the term “discretionary”. When I think of the word I think of mowing my lawn myself vs. having the kid down the street do it. Buying Coke (KO) or buying the generic store bought brand of soda. Going to the movies vs. waiting for it to come out and renting it. Those are truly discretionary purchases.

A Harley Davidson rider will never, ever, make the decision to NOT buy a Harley and instead hop on a Suzuki to “save a few bucks”. That very fact means there is a very large limit to just how discretionary the bikes are.

More “misinformation” is also bantered about that people do not have the money to spend “15k to 30K” for a bike. Now, I have been to a dealership lately and I can tell you there is a whole swath of bikes available for $8,000 to $12,000. That alone makes the potential affordability of it audience wider.

Now, all this is not to say that for some people the bike is discretionary. I as much said so last year when share were trading at all time high’s near $70. Shares have since cratered and sit under $40. Slowing sales and rising credit issues are the main culprits.

What has happened is Harley riders has slowed to rate at which the “trade up” their bikes to bigger, more expensive models. They have not decided to go with another brand. Were Harleys truly discretionary, this would be the trend. Rather than trading in an existing bike for another, riders are sticking with what they have. This is the reason recently the observation was made that the secondary market has remained so strong. The demand for the bikes is still there, people are just being more selective in their purchases.

Let’s not forget that this brand is so powerful people tattoo its logo on their skin. Ever see Google (GOOG) or Apple (AAPL) tattooed on anyone? We know how passionate those folks are about their products, yet it would seem they pale to those who ride HOG’s. You cannot both put a price tag on this and underestimate the power of the brand in people decision making process.

This passion means there is an in-elasticity to the “discretionary” aspect of the bikes. If that is true, and I believe it is, then we may have reached the limit of it and shares have bottomed. That is why I bought earlier in the year…

Another note: As expected, the labor issue has been put to rest.

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long HOG, None

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

Monday’s Upgrades and Downgrades


Upgrades
Daktronics (DAKT)- CL King Neutral » Accumulate
ISTA Pharm (ISTA)- Punk, Ziegel & Co Sell » Mkt Perform
Yamana Gold (AUY)- UBS Neutral » Buy
Rio Tinto PLC (RTP)- Bernstein Mkt Perform » Outperform
BHP Billiton (BHP)- Bernstein Mkt Perform » Outperform
Brookfield Pptys (BPO)- Credit Suisse Underperform » Neutral
SL Green Rlty (SLG)- Credit Suisse Underperform » Neutral
Prudential (PRU)- Lehman Brothers Underweight » Overweight

Downgrades
Baker Hughes (BHI)- CapitalOne southcoast Add » Neutral
Tractor Supply (TSCO)- Wedbush Morgan Buy » Hold
Isilon Systems (ISLN)- McAdams,Wright,Ragen Buy » Hold
Micrel (MCRL)- AmTech Research Buy » Neutral
Isilon Systems (ISLN)- Caris & Company Below Average » Sell
Harmony Gold (HMY)- UBS Neutral » Sell
KC Southern (KSU)- BMO Capital Markets Outperform » Market Perform
Allegheny Tech (ATI)- Cowen & Co Outperform » Neutral
Riverbed Technology (RVBD)- Deutsche Securities Buy » Hold
Meruelo Maddux (MMPI)- RBC Capital Mkts Outperform » Sector Perform
Radware (RDWR)- RBC Capital Mkts Outperform » Sector Perform
Transglobe Energy (TGA)- RBC Capital Mkts Outperform » Sector Perform
Demandtec (DMAN)- William Blair Outperform » Mkt Perform
Gap Inc (GPS)- Credit Suisse Outperform » Neutral
Sirius Satellite (SIRI)- Credit Suisse Outperform » Neutral
KC Southern (KSU)- UBS Buy » Neutral
ASML Holding (ASML)- JP Morgan Overweight » Neutral
Apt Inv & Mgt (AIV)- Credit Suisse Outperform » Neutral
Camden Property (CPT)- Credit Suisse Outperform » Neutral
Georgia Gulf (GGC)- Lehman Brothers Overweight » Equal-weight

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.