Categories
Articles

Sears’ Nifty Purchase

Even I missed this one until alerted by a reader…..

Footstar Inc. (OTC:FTAR) is selling its footwear license to Sears Holdings (SHLD) for $13 million in preparation for winding down its business at the end of the year. Footstar agreed to sell substantially all of its intellectual property to Sears, including the intellectual property related to Sears’ Kmart business.

Footstar operates roughly 1,300 licensed footwear departments at Kmart under a contract set to expire at the end of 2008. They also operate licensed footwear departments in 859 Rite Aid Corporation stores located on the West Coast. Brands under Footstar’s operations include Thom McAn, Cobbie Cuddlers and Texas Steer — which are company owned — and Route 66 and Basic Editions. Kmart-licensed footwear departments account for substantially all of its $630 million in sales and $53 million operating profit. Kmart has begun to hire several employees from Footstar and has promised employment to almost all current management.

So, for $13 million Lampert has saved Sears essentially $53 million annually (the profits Footstar received from Kmart). Not a bad return….

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long SHLD

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

Sears' Nifty Purchase

Even I missed this one until alerted by a reader…..

Footstar Inc. (OTC:FTAR) is selling its footwear license to Sears Holdings (SHLD) for $13 million in preparation for winding down its business at the end of the year. Footstar agreed to sell substantially all of its intellectual property to Sears, including the intellectual property related to Sears’ Kmart business.

Footstar operates roughly 1,300 licensed footwear departments at Kmart under a contract set to expire at the end of 2008. They also operate licensed footwear departments in 859 Rite Aid Corporation stores located on the West Coast. Brands under Footstar’s operations include Thom McAn, Cobbie Cuddlers and Texas Steer — which are company owned — and Route 66 and Basic Editions. Kmart-licensed footwear departments account for substantially all of its $630 million in sales and $53 million operating profit. Kmart has begun to hire several employees from Footstar and has promised employment to almost all current management.

So, for $13 million Lampert has saved Sears essentially $53 million annually (the profits Footstar received from Kmart). Not a bad return….

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long SHLD

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

Monday’s Links

Deal.com, Barrons on Whitman, Ohio AG, Hmmmmm

– Thank you for the mention…..

– Barron’s did a nice piece over the weekend on Marty Whitman.

– What is wrong with these guys?

– Now, where did we read this story before? Maybe, here?

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

Monday's Links

Deal.com, Barrons on Whitman, Ohio AG, Hmmmmm

– Thank you for the mention…..

– Barron’s did a nice piece over the weekend on Marty Whitman.

– What is wrong with these guys?

– Now, where did we read this story before? Maybe, here?

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

Borders Gets New Deal with Ackman

This is really good news for shareholders…

Here are the new terms:

* A lower interest rate of 9.8% on the $42.5 million senior secured term loan. The original Pershing Square financing commitment carried a 12.5% interest rate.

* An increased backstop purchase offer (“put”) of $135 million for the international subsidiaries. The original Pershing Square financing commitment included a purchase obligation at a price of $125 million. As previously stated, Borders Group believes its international subsidiaries are worth substantially more than the amended backstop purchase offer price and the company has retained the right to continue its ongoing strategic alternatives process for these businesses.

* A reduction in the number of warrants issued at closing to Pershing Square to 9.55 million warrants to purchase company common stock at $7.00 per share and a reduction in the term of all warrants issued to Pershing Square from 7.5 years to 6.5 years. The original Pershing Square financing commitment included 14.7 million in up-front warrants at $7.00 per share. Under the new agreement, Borders Group is required to issue an additional 5.15 million warrants to Pershing Square if any of the following three conditions occurs: the company exercises the put related to the sale of the international subsidiaries, a definitive agreement relating to a change-of-control of the company is not signed by October 1, 2008, or the company terminates the strategic alternatives process.

“We are pleased to have reached a final financing agreement with Pershing Square that includes more advantageous terms and still provides Borders with the necessary funding to continue implementing our key initiatives,” said Borders Group Chief Executive Officer George Jones. “The process of reviewing alternative financing proposals over the past two weeks was beneficial as it yielded an outcome that is better for our company and our shareholders. We are pleased to have the backing of Pershing Square, our largest shareholder, as we move forward and we appreciate their continued confidence. Borders is now turning its focus to the broader strategic alternatives process.”

Essentially Ackman has told the company “I’ve got your back. Go get any offer you can and I will make you a better one.” This really does illustrate the belief ha has in the prospects for the company. It also shows us how bad he wants to keep control of it. Rather than let a third party come in and stake a claim, he has given the company the latitude to shop for deal that he will willingly beat. Good…

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long BGP

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

"Discretionary" Harley’s? Not So Fast

There has been a flurry of posts flying around lately about Harley Davidson (HOG) and their status as a “discretionary” purchase. Now, while the choice to buy a motorcycle may be for some, riding a Harley is not necessarily. There is a huge segment of the Harley population that considers their cars their second mode of transportation.

I am reminded of a story told to me by a friend. His buddy called him and said he was bringing over his new Harley for him to see. As my friend came out to look at it, his buddy’s wife was sitting on the back of the bike. “Isn’t she the most beautiful thing you have ever seen?” he was asked. My friend then looked at me and said, “He was of course talking about the bike”. Ever here a story about that from a Mac user? Or a Ford (F) driver? Me either…

I think the confusion here may be based on the term “discretionary”. When I think of the word I think of mowing my lawn myself vs. having the kid down the street do it. Buying Coke (KO) or buying the generic store bought brand of soda. Going to the movies vs. waiting for it to come out and renting it. Those are truly discretionary purchases.

A Harley Davidson rider will never, ever, make the decision to NOT buy a Harley and instead hop on a Suzuki to “save a few bucks”. That very fact means there is a very large limit to just how discretionary the bikes are.

More “misinformation” is also bantered about that people do not have the money to spend “15k to 30K” for a bike. Now, I have been to a dealership lately and I can tell you there is a whole swath of bikes available for $8,000 to $12,000. That alone makes the potential affordability of it audience wider.

Now, all this is not to say that for some people the bike is discretionary. I as much said so last year when share were trading at all time high’s near $70. Shares have since cratered and sit under $40. Slowing sales and rising credit issues are the main culprits.

What has happened is Harley riders has slowed to rate at which the “trade up” their bikes to bigger, more expensive models. They have not decided to go with another brand. Were Harleys truly discretionary, this would be the trend. Rather than trading in an existing bike for another, riders are sticking with what they have. This is the reason recently the observation was made that the secondary market has remained so strong. The demand for the bikes is still there, people are just being more selective in their purchases.

Let’s not forget that this brand is so powerful people tattoo its logo on their skin. Ever see Google (GOOG) or Apple (AAPL) tattooed on anyone? We know how passionate those folks are about their products, yet it would seem they pale to those who ride HOG’s. You cannot both put a price tag on this and underestimate the power of the brand in people decision making process.

This passion means there is an in-elasticity to the “discretionary” aspect of the bikes. If that is true, and I believe it is, then we may have reached the limit of it and shares have bottomed. That is why I bought earlier in the year…

Another note: As expected, the labor issue has been put to rest.

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long HOG, None

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

"Discretionary" Harley's? Not So Fast

There has been a flurry of posts flying around lately about Harley Davidson (HOG) and their status as a “discretionary” purchase. Now, while the choice to buy a motorcycle may be for some, riding a Harley is not necessarily. There is a huge segment of the Harley population that considers their cars their second mode of transportation.

I am reminded of a story told to me by a friend. His buddy called him and said he was bringing over his new Harley for him to see. As my friend came out to look at it, his buddy’s wife was sitting on the back of the bike. “Isn’t she the most beautiful thing you have ever seen?” he was asked. My friend then looked at me and said, “He was of course talking about the bike”. Ever here a story about that from a Mac user? Or a Ford (F) driver? Me either…

I think the confusion here may be based on the term “discretionary”. When I think of the word I think of mowing my lawn myself vs. having the kid down the street do it. Buying Coke (KO) or buying the generic store bought brand of soda. Going to the movies vs. waiting for it to come out and renting it. Those are truly discretionary purchases.

A Harley Davidson rider will never, ever, make the decision to NOT buy a Harley and instead hop on a Suzuki to “save a few bucks”. That very fact means there is a very large limit to just how discretionary the bikes are.

More “misinformation” is also bantered about that people do not have the money to spend “15k to 30K” for a bike. Now, I have been to a dealership lately and I can tell you there is a whole swath of bikes available for $8,000 to $12,000. That alone makes the potential affordability of it audience wider.

Now, all this is not to say that for some people the bike is discretionary. I as much said so last year when share were trading at all time high’s near $70. Shares have since cratered and sit under $40. Slowing sales and rising credit issues are the main culprits.

What has happened is Harley riders has slowed to rate at which the “trade up” their bikes to bigger, more expensive models. They have not decided to go with another brand. Were Harleys truly discretionary, this would be the trend. Rather than trading in an existing bike for another, riders are sticking with what they have. This is the reason recently the observation was made that the secondary market has remained so strong. The demand for the bikes is still there, people are just being more selective in their purchases.

Let’s not forget that this brand is so powerful people tattoo its logo on their skin. Ever see Google (GOOG) or Apple (AAPL) tattooed on anyone? We know how passionate those folks are about their products, yet it would seem they pale to those who ride HOG’s. You cannot both put a price tag on this and underestimate the power of the brand in people decision making process.

This passion means there is an in-elasticity to the “discretionary” aspect of the bikes. If that is true, and I believe it is, then we may have reached the limit of it and shares have bottomed. That is why I bought earlier in the year…

Another note: As expected, the labor issue has been put to rest.

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long HOG, None

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

Monday’s Upgrades and Downgrades


Upgrades
Daktronics (DAKT)- CL King Neutral » Accumulate
ISTA Pharm (ISTA)- Punk, Ziegel & Co Sell » Mkt Perform
Yamana Gold (AUY)- UBS Neutral » Buy
Rio Tinto PLC (RTP)- Bernstein Mkt Perform » Outperform
BHP Billiton (BHP)- Bernstein Mkt Perform » Outperform
Brookfield Pptys (BPO)- Credit Suisse Underperform » Neutral
SL Green Rlty (SLG)- Credit Suisse Underperform » Neutral
Prudential (PRU)- Lehman Brothers Underweight » Overweight

Downgrades
Baker Hughes (BHI)- CapitalOne southcoast Add » Neutral
Tractor Supply (TSCO)- Wedbush Morgan Buy » Hold
Isilon Systems (ISLN)- McAdams,Wright,Ragen Buy » Hold
Micrel (MCRL)- AmTech Research Buy » Neutral
Isilon Systems (ISLN)- Caris & Company Below Average » Sell
Harmony Gold (HMY)- UBS Neutral » Sell
KC Southern (KSU)- BMO Capital Markets Outperform » Market Perform
Allegheny Tech (ATI)- Cowen & Co Outperform » Neutral
Riverbed Technology (RVBD)- Deutsche Securities Buy » Hold
Meruelo Maddux (MMPI)- RBC Capital Mkts Outperform » Sector Perform
Radware (RDWR)- RBC Capital Mkts Outperform » Sector Perform
Transglobe Energy (TGA)- RBC Capital Mkts Outperform » Sector Perform
Demandtec (DMAN)- William Blair Outperform » Mkt Perform
Gap Inc (GPS)- Credit Suisse Outperform » Neutral
Sirius Satellite (SIRI)- Credit Suisse Outperform » Neutral
KC Southern (KSU)- UBS Buy » Neutral
ASML Holding (ASML)- JP Morgan Overweight » Neutral
Apt Inv & Mgt (AIV)- Credit Suisse Outperform » Neutral
Camden Property (CPT)- Credit Suisse Outperform » Neutral
Georgia Gulf (GGC)- Lehman Brothers Overweight » Equal-weight

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

Monday's Upgrades and Downgrades


Upgrades
Daktronics (DAKT)- CL King Neutral » Accumulate
ISTA Pharm (ISTA)- Punk, Ziegel & Co Sell » Mkt Perform
Yamana Gold (AUY)- UBS Neutral » Buy
Rio Tinto PLC (RTP)- Bernstein Mkt Perform » Outperform
BHP Billiton (BHP)- Bernstein Mkt Perform » Outperform
Brookfield Pptys (BPO)- Credit Suisse Underperform » Neutral
SL Green Rlty (SLG)- Credit Suisse Underperform » Neutral
Prudential (PRU)- Lehman Brothers Underweight » Overweight

Downgrades
Baker Hughes (BHI)- CapitalOne southcoast Add » Neutral
Tractor Supply (TSCO)- Wedbush Morgan Buy » Hold
Isilon Systems (ISLN)- McAdams,Wright,Ragen Buy » Hold
Micrel (MCRL)- AmTech Research Buy » Neutral
Isilon Systems (ISLN)- Caris & Company Below Average » Sell
Harmony Gold (HMY)- UBS Neutral » Sell
KC Southern (KSU)- BMO Capital Markets Outperform » Market Perform
Allegheny Tech (ATI)- Cowen & Co Outperform » Neutral
Riverbed Technology (RVBD)- Deutsche Securities Buy » Hold
Meruelo Maddux (MMPI)- RBC Capital Mkts Outperform » Sector Perform
Radware (RDWR)- RBC Capital Mkts Outperform » Sector Perform
Transglobe Energy (TGA)- RBC Capital Mkts Outperform » Sector Perform
Demandtec (DMAN)- William Blair Outperform » Mkt Perform
Gap Inc (GPS)- Credit Suisse Outperform » Neutral
Sirius Satellite (SIRI)- Credit Suisse Outperform » Neutral
KC Southern (KSU)- UBS Buy » Neutral
ASML Holding (ASML)- JP Morgan Overweight » Neutral
Apt Inv & Mgt (AIV)- Credit Suisse Outperform » Neutral
Camden Property (CPT)- Credit Suisse Outperform » Neutral
Georgia Gulf (GGC)- Lehman Brothers Overweight » Equal-weight

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

Citigroup: 10 Years Later

There has been a bunch of commentary about Citigroup (C) now that the 10th anniversary of the merger between Travelers and Citicorp that created the behemoth is upon us.

The commentary has fallen into 2 camps:

1- Better management can fix the “Financial Super-Market” and right the ship.

2- It has been a mistake since day one and need to be broken up.

Let’s ignore the performance of the stock vs. the S&P since we all know that price performance and success or failure are not necessarily a direct correlation. While it is true that after 10 years shareholders at C are 30% behind the average, up until the last 10 months, shareholders we handily ahead of the average for the entire decade.

So, if we have the conversation based simply on that, we would say that the company itself has performed as results have driven the stocks price bit that recent management blunders have caused the collapse.

I think we can agree that is far to simplistic a way to look at it.

One would be hard pressed to argue that Citigroup has not had the burden of being saddled with poor management. Sandy Weill, who created it was a classic gunslinger by even the most conservative comparisons. Chuck Prince, who followed him was left a legal and regulatory mess that he did clean up but so lacked Weill’s personality and charisma, he was never able to rally support for any initiative of his own. It also did not help that he was essentially Weill’s hand-picked successor.

Along the way the executive management at Citi was left in shambles. Names like Jamie Dimon, now the head of JP Morgan (JPM), Wells Fargo (WFC) Head Richard Kovacevich, AIG (AIG) Chairman Robert Willumstad all called Citi home and were squeezed out. The list of second tier names is longer and more extensive.

Weill ran off potential challengers while in charge and his choice of Prince as successor without a real process cause others to “seek other opportunities” in frustration.

Enter Pandit. A successful hedge fund manager and by all accounts a very smart man he inherits a mess the others were most likely offered and all refused. Capital shortfalls cause Pandit to seek billions from the middle east and now leave him with little choice.

While the financial super-market idea will soon be put to sleep permanently (if it has not already) as a bad idea from the start, an argument can made that while an unwieldy beast, it may have worked. A huge operation like that needed deft management to execute. Could they have executed it, Citi may indeed have become the “World’s Bank”. Despite no real leadership in the CEO suite, Citi did grow earnings and its dividend substantially.

Alas it will not happen. Weill was too focused on his position rather than that of the bank and ran off quality people around him. Rather than cultivate leadership in the mold of Goldman Sachs (GS), he decimated the ranks. Prince was so focused on fixing the mess left behind, he did not see what was going on around him.

Pandit now has no other option but to break off chunks of the operation if for no other reason than to restore above adequate liquidity without further shareholder dilution. Long term the bank is still a behemoth in terms of assets and shareholders buying today will be glad they did.

Shareholders who owned shares for the last decade though will be left wondering what could have been had management bee focused on what was really important.

I guess that means that I am not sold on the “too big to manage” camp when it comes to Citigroup, I am in the “poor management” one.

Disclosure (“none” means no position): Long C

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

FDA Tobacco Bill: A Partnership

Let’s take a look at the FDA Tobacco Bill and see what effect it may have on the industry.

The bill would effect tobacco products manufactured and sold primarily by R.J. Reynolds Tobacco (RAI), Loews Corp.’s Lorillard Tobacco (LTR), Vector Group Ltd.’s Liggett Group (VGR), British American Tobacco (BAT) and Altria (MO) in the US.

The bill will enable the FDA to prevent the introduction of new cigarette brands.

“`(1) NEW TOBACCO PRODUCT DEFINED- For purposes of this section the term `new tobacco product’ means–

`(A) any tobacco product (including those products in test markets) that was not commercially marketed in the United States as of June 1, 2003; or

`(B) any modification (including a change in design, any component, any part, or any constituent, including a smoke constituent, or in the content, delivery or form of nicotine, or any other additive or ingredient) of a tobacco product where the modified product was commercially marketed in the United States after June 1, 2003.

`(2) PREMARKET APPROVAL REQUIRED-

`(A) NEW PRODUCTS- Approval under this section of an application for premarket approval for any new tobacco product is required.”

Now, what could cause a new product to be denied?

“(2) DENIAL OF APPROVAL- The Secretary shall deny approval of an application for a tobacco product if, upon the basis of the information submitted to the Secretary as part of the application and any other information before the Secretary with respect to such tobacco product, the Secretary finds that–

`(A) there is a lack of a showing that permitting such tobacco product to be marketed would be appropriate for the protection of the public health;”

In other words, do not expect a new cigarette to be introduced in the US. What is here now is what will be here 20 years from now. If you are Altria (MO), and have over 50% market share, this is very good news indeed. It also means that recently introduced low cost products may come under review and alterations to the product may become necessary that will substantially raise the cost of it. A shrinking cost basis for consumers between brands, will most likely cause many to “trade up” to the premium brand.

Currently, any litigation risk in cigarettes surrounds alleged fraud. Fraud in marketing and fraud in labeling. What will the FDA bill do? It completely removes the risk of litigation for fraud and allows the tobacco companies to tell consumers that they are complying with government product safety standards. By doing this they assure a safer product produced under the guidance of the FDA. Let’s look.

Since most of the current litigation is of the “Light” cigarettes, lets go to that section.

SEC. 911. MODIFIED RISK TOBACCO PRODUCTS.

`(a) In General- No person may introduce or deliver for introduction into interstate commerce any modified risk tobacco product unless approval of an application filed pursuant to subsection (d) is effective with respect to such product.

`(b) Definitions- In this section:

`(1) MODIFIED RISK TOBACCO PRODUCT- The term `modified risk tobacco product’ means any tobacco product that is sold or distributed for use to reduce harm or the risk of tobacco-related disease associated with commercially marketed tobacco products.

This means FDA approval of all claims on “light” and “low tar” cigarettes. This clause means that FDA approval of these cigarettes does give their stamp of approval that “light” is “safer”.

What are the conditions for approval?

Approval-

`(1) MODIFIED RISK PRODUCTS- Except as provided in paragraph (2), the Secretary shall approve an application for a modified risk tobacco product filed under this section only if the Secretary determines that the applicant has demonstrated that such product, as it is actually used by consumers, will–

`(A) significantly reduce harm and the risk of tobacco-related disease to individual tobacco users; and

`(B) benefit the health of the population as a whole taking into account both users of tobacco products and persons who do not currently use tobacco products.

They do not have to be “safe”, just “safer” than the current choice to legally be called “light”.

The bill also requires the FDA to inspect tobacco sellers for counterfeit cigarettes and report instances to the applicable Attorney General “immediately”. This has been a very large issue for domestic manufacturers as foreign “knockoffs” have entered the country and cost Altria millions of dollars in annual revenue. The bill effectively makes the FDA the “sheriff” and forces them to protect the market.

Could the FDA ban tobacco? The bill says no.

“`(3) POWER RESERVED TO CONGRESS- Because of the importance of a decision of the Secretary to issue a regulation establishing a tobacco product standard–

`(A) banning all cigarettes, all smokeless tobacco products, all little cigars, all cigars other than little cigars, all pipe tobacco, or all roll your own tobacco products; or

`(B) requiring the reduction of nicotine yields of a tobacco product to zero,

Congress expressly reserves to itself such power.”

Will Congress ban tobacco? Never…..How will the States ever replace the billions of dollars in tax revenue they receive from taxing them?

What the bill does is stop the FDA from banning tobacco and forces them to endorse it…..

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long MO, None

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

"Fast Money" for Monday


Monday’s Picks
Jeff Macke likes Microsoft (MSFT0 $29.16

Guy Adami prefers Merck (MRK) $40.0

Pete Najarian thinks Energy Conversion Devices (ENER) $33.24 is a buy.

Friday’s Results
Jeff Macke likes Apple (AAPL) $151.61 Close $153.08 GAIN

Guy Adami prefers Corning (GLW) $25.53 Close $25.56 GAIN

Karen Finerman recommends Microsoft (MSFT) $29.0 Close $29.16 GIAN

Pete Najarian thinks Walter Industries (WLT) $69.08 is a buy. Close $69.66 GAIN

2008 Records:
Brian Schaeffer= 0-1
Carter Worth= 0-1
Jon Najarian= 4-1
Jeff Macke= 25-17
Tim Seymore= 14-8
Guy Adami= 23-22
Pete Najarian= 26-19
Karen Finerman= 19-23-1
Joe Terrenova= 1-1

2007 Results (Since 6/21):
Guy Adami= 58-46 = 56%
Jeff Macke= 60-40 = 60%
Pete Najarian= 49-41 = 54%

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

This Week’s Insider Buys

Here are the insider purchases of over $1 million

Corcept Therapeutics Inc (CORT)= $ 20,522,000
Penwest Pharmaceuticals Co (PPCO) = $3,686,000
Churchill Downs Inc (CHDN)= $ 3,153,000
Enterprise GP Holdings L P (EPE) = $2,533,000
Hercules Offshore Inc (HERO)= $2,365,000
3Com Corp (COMS)= $2,167,000
Xcorporeal Inc New (XCR)=$2,100,000
Smart Balance Inc (SMBL)=$1,970,000
Enterprise Products Partners L P (EPD)= $1,827,000
Cenveo Inc (CVO)=$1,215,000
Emeritus Corp (ESC)=$1,075,000

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

This Week's Insider Buys

Here are the insider purchases of over $1 million

Corcept Therapeutics Inc (CORT)= $ 20,522,000
Penwest Pharmaceuticals Co (PPCO) = $3,686,000
Churchill Downs Inc (CHDN)= $ 3,153,000
Enterprise GP Holdings L P (EPE) = $2,533,000
Hercules Offshore Inc (HERO)= $2,365,000
3Com Corp (COMS)= $2,167,000
Xcorporeal Inc New (XCR)=$2,100,000
Smart Balance Inc (SMBL)=$1,970,000
Enterprise Products Partners L P (EPD)= $1,827,000
Cenveo Inc (CVO)=$1,215,000
Emeritus Corp (ESC)=$1,075,000

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Categories
Articles

March’s Most Popular Posts

Here is what folks read the most of in March.

1- Altria’s Spin: Your Questions Answered

2- Ackman’s Target Loss: Wow


3- Circuit City Being Sold Soon?

4- Altria’s Kraft Spin: Q & A


5- T2 Partners Glenn Tounge on Berkshire (Video)

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.