Categories
Articles

Sobering Housing News….Very Sobering

I was going to piece this in but it really needs to be read in its entirety. Any bold highlights are mine.

The Mortgage Bankers Association came out with their Q1 report today and then updated their forecast:

WASHINGTON, D.C. (May 28, 2009) — Foreclosure actions were initiated on 1.37 percent of first mortgages during the first quarter of 2009, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association. This was a 29 basis point increase over the fourth quarter of 2008 and a 36 basis point increase from one year ago. Both the level of foreclosures started and the size of the quarter over quarter increase are record highs.

According the MBA’s National Delinquency Survey, the delinquency rate for mortgage loans on one-to-four-unit residential properties was 8.22 percent on a non-seasonally adjusted basis, down 41 basis points from 8.63 percent in the fourth quarter of 2008. Delinquency rates always decline in the first quarter of the year due to a variety of seasonal factors. After accounting for these factors, the seasonally adjusted delinquency rate was 9.12 percent of all loans outstanding as of the end of the first quarter of 2009, up 124 basis points from the fourth quarter of 2008, and up 277 basis points from one year ago.

The seasonally adjusted rate is the highest in the MBA’s records going back to 1972 and the unadjusted rate is the highest recorded in the first quarter of any year back to 1972.

This means now that on every quantifiable level, this housing bust is far worse than the most recent one in the early 1990’s. Read more on that and its effect here.

The delinquency rate includes loans that are at least one payment past due but does not include loans in the process of foreclosure. The percentage of loans in the foreclosure process at the end of the first quarter was 3.85 percent, an increase of 55 basis points from the fourth quarter of 2008 and up 138 basis points from one year ago. Both the foreclosure inventory percentage and the quarter to quarter increase are record highs.

The combined percentage of loans in foreclosure and at least one payment past due, meaning the percentage of mortgage holders not current on their mortgages, was 12.07 percent on a non-seasonally adjusted basis, the highest ever recorded in the MBA delinquency survey.

“The increase in the foreclosure number is sobering but not unexpected. The rate of foreclosure starts remained essentially flat for the last three quarters of 2008 and we suspected that the numbers were artificially low due to various state and local moratoria, the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac halt on foreclosures, and various company-level moratoria,” said Jay Brinkmann, MBA’s chief economist. “Now that the guidelines of the administration’s loan modification programs are known, combined with the large number of vacant homes with past due mortgages, the pace of foreclosures has stepped up considerably.”

“In looking at these numbers, it is important to focus on what has changed as well what continue to be the key drivers of foreclosures. What has changed is the shifting of the problem somewhat away from the subprime and option ARM/Alt-A loans to the prime fixed-rate loans. The foreclosure rate on prime fixed-rate loans has doubled in the last year, and, for the first time since the rapid growth of subprime lending, prime fixed-rate loans now represent the largest share of new foreclosures. In addition, almost half of the overall increase in foreclosure starts we saw in the first quarter was due to the increase in prime fixed-rate loans. More than anything else, this points to the impact of the recession and drops in employment on mortgage defaults.

This means that the housing bust has cycled from a sub-prime to Alt-A to now an employment issue. Since we were already in the midst of the drop when the layoff began, those losing job had no way to sell their homes. Now even good borrowers with conforming loans are defaulting at a record rate.

“What has not changed, however, is the oversized impact of California, Florida, Arizona and Nevada in driving up the national numbers. Those states continue to account for about 46 percent of the foreclosure starts in the country, and represented 56 percent of the increase in foreclosure starts, including half of the increase in prime fixed-rate foreclosure starts.

“It is difficult to overstate the severe impact home price declines have had on mortgage performance in those four states. 10.6 percent of the mortgages in Florida are now somewhere in the process of foreclosure. In Nevada it is 7.8 percent, Arizona 5.6 percent and California 5.2 percent.

“In the first three months of this year, foreclosure actions were started on 3.4 percent of the mortgages in Nevada, 2.8 percent of the mortgages in Florida, 2.5 percent of the mortgages in Arizona and 2.2 percent of the loans in California. In comparison, the states with the highest foreclosure rates in the hard hit Midwest were Michigan and Illinois at 1.5 percent and Indiana and Ohio at 1.3 percent.

“While the national foreclosure start rate was 1.37 percent in the first quarter, in California, Florida, Nevada and Arizona it was 2.45 percent. Absent those four states, the national rate would have been 1.01 percent.

“Looking forward, it does not appear the level of mortgage defaults will begin to fall until after the employment situation begins to improve. MBA’s forecast, a view now shared by the Federal Reserve and others, is that the unemployment rate will not hit its peak until mid-2010. Since changes in mortgage performance lag changes in the level of employment, it is unlikely we will see much of an improvement until after that,” said Brinkmann.

Wanr more bad news? What could be worse? Well, we are actually in a trough for Alt-A and Option Arm resets as the following chart shows:

Simply put? It gets worse from here and here is already real bad…

So aside from the damage already done, rapidly rising mortgage rates and more folks losing their jobs, we have a wave of resets coming that dwarfs the first one that pushed housing off the cliff. Now, there is no way to know what percentage of those in 2010-11 set to reset have either a) already lost their job and will default before then, b) have already defaulted or c) have already converted into  conforming loans. 

But, we do know this, no matter how large the percentage of those set to reset that fit into a, b or c above, there is another serious body blow to the housing market waiting around the corner.

We also know that government programs designed to help have been abject failures as HOPE for Homeowners, designed to save 400k homes, has saved, ummm,  1 (that is 1…not a misprint).  A Fannie Mae program, HomeSaver Advance (HSA) has seen 70% of the people it actually did help re-default.  This isn’t an issue we can govern our way out of and too be honest,  government meddling is making it worse. How many people held on to homes, wiping out savings in the HOPE a government program was going to bail them out? Only after it was too late did they find the program would not work for them and now not only were they losing their home, their saving was gone also.

It is the unintended consequence of government trying to artificially prop up a market.

The sad truth is this just has to play out and it will be a long and difficult process. Do not let anyone tell you any different…


Disclosure (“none” means no position):

Categories
Articles

"Davidson": Baltic Dry Index A Key Indicator

The Baltic Dry Index tracks the cost to ship dry bulk goods, i.e. grain, metal ores, coal and etc.(see chart 1) Baltic Capesize Index tracks the shipping costs on the largest of the dry bulk vessels, i.e. vessels that are in excess of 80,000 dwt.(see chart 2) Capesize vessels are viewed as primarily carry coal and iron ore vessels. The Baltic Capesize Index tends to fluctuate with the amount of steel being produced and reflects global economic activity. Over the last two weeks the Baltic Capesize Index has increased over 80%. The same two weeks the broader Baltic Dry Index has increased 21%. The Baltic Dry Index has increased over 470% from its low of 663 in Dec 5, 2008 to 3164 on May 27, 2009.

Most assume that speculators are not driving up the cost of vessels as the result of some speculative market activity and that these indices provide an untarnished view of world business activity. But, with the history of oil at $147bbl in 2008 still sharp in memory, it should always be considered that speculation could be playing a part in these indices. Regardless of the all the sources of these price increases, these indices are in line with the Port of LA activity regarding loaded containers which provides another reference point.(see chart 3)

That these charts reflect a substantial turn upwards in global business activity and psychology is a point that should catch the attention of all investors in my opinion.




Disclosure (“none” means no position):

Categories
Articles

Friday’s Links

Socialism, Harvard, Cuban, Dasan

– Funny what the NY Times determined was socialism before today

– In financial trouble. Hat tip reader Alex

– Always fighting somebody

– Nice post on an investment thesis


Disclosure (“none” means no position):

Categories
Articles

Ackman Loses Proxy Battle With Target

A classic win some/lose some scenario unfolded today at the Target (TGT) meeting for investor Bill Ackman.

Here are some past posts on the subject here, here, and here

Here is soke of the press release from Target:

“On behalf of Target’s Board of Directors and management team, we thank our shareholders for their overwhelming support throughout this process,” said Gregg Steinhafel, Target’s Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. “Today’s outcome demonstrates the confidence Target shareholders have in our Board’s qualifications, diversity and experience to provide effective and independent oversight and direction to the company, contributing to the creation of one of the most recognized brands in the United States. We remain dedicated to serving the interests of all shareholders by sustaining Target’s competitive advantage, driving continued profitable growth and generating substantial shareholder value over time.”

Analysis From Bloomberg:

Ackman Said:

As an aside, he does have very valid points as to the voting process involved not just at Target but in corporate America in general. It should not be more dificult to vote for a Board of Directors than the President. It also should be a secret vote and a single ballot so as to not be influenced.


Disclosure (“none” means no position):

Categories
Articles

Bruce Berkowitz on Bloomberg

Note to CNBC: Watch and Learn, this is how to be prepared for an interview. First watch the muddles mess that was CBNC’s effort this am then watch this. Unlike CNBC who had no idea what Bruce has invested in, this interviewer knew and had good questions related to it.


Disclosure (“none” means no position):

Categories
Articles

Berkshire’s Sokol: "No Green Shoots"

The man rumored to be taking over for Berkshire’s (BRK.a) Warren Buffett says 2011 may be the turn….not now or next year.


Disclosure (“none” means no position):

Categories
Articles

Bruce Berkowitz at Morningstar Conference

This is disappointing that CNBC has one of the best and honest fund managers on and only gives him 3:50 to talk, a big whiff on their part. Meanwhile, they’ll give Kneale and Gasparino 10 minutes to call each other names. Just when I forget why I stopped watching, they remind me…

Anyway, here is Bruce




Disclosure (“none” means no position):

Categories
Articles

Ackman: General Growth "worth $20 to $35"

Hat tip to Zero Hedge for this. Regular readers know we own a bunch of General Growth Properties (GGWPQ) at $.49. It currently trades at $1.60 today and if Ackman is right, it is still a stunning value.

Ira Sohn

Publish at Scribd or explore others: Creative Writing Short Stories Research Math & Engineering Magazines & Newspape Non-fiction world culture


Disclosure (“none” means no position):

Categories
Articles

The Bond Boys Come Out Swinging

Now this chart is either really good news or dark storm clouds on the horizon…

Scott Grannis says of it:

Treasury yields are heading skyward, as the bond market begins to realize that a) the economy is improving, b) monetary policy is incredibly expansionary, and c) fiscal policy is creating massive financing needs. This is a perfect storm for the Treasury market, and it could send yields far higher in short order.

The silver lining to this thunderstorm cloud is that it may cause our politicians to rethink their plans to spend money like a drunken sailor. It would be great if Obama came to have the same respect for the bond market as Bill Clinton did.

“Davidson” says of it all:

This piece by Scott Grannis begs the question: “Would Bernanke reigning in stimulus boost market confidence?” There are many indications that confidence in the credit markets have improved. It is understood that if lender’s confidence levels continued to improve as has been apparent then many of the looming refinance issues for commercial real estate would ease. The effect on lender’s confidence in the auto loan and home loan market could continue to improve which would go a long way towards easing fears of the after-effects of a GM bailout or easing the fears of Alt-A mtg rollovers.

If Bernanke declares that now is the time to reduce the stimulus, would this rein in the fears of pending inflation, boost lender confidence and stimulate economic improvement?

Confidence in our financial system is crucial to our society. It is the lack of confidence which causes deep recessions as everyone retrenches at once. It is the excess confidence that produces bubbles as many over extend themselves.

A boost to confidence would be welcome.

My two cents:

Obama is learning (hopefully) that all his spending plans can be put on hold by the “Bond Boys”. Much as Clinton learned, should they not like the direction things are going, they have the ability to drive up interest rates.

Why is that a problem?

Consider a second chart, this one of 30 year mortgage rates

Look great right? What better to help spur housing except record low rates! But, look at the relationship between the 10yr. Treasury and the 30yr. mortgage. The 30 yr. on average tends to run about 1.7% greater than the 10yr.

So…….why does this matter? Well the 10yr. exploded to 3.5% today and that correlates to an appoximiate 30yr. rate of 5.2% upcoming or over 1/2 a point higher than just a week and a half ago. Nothing, and I mean nothing will throw more  cold water on this housing market that rapidly rising interest rates. Folks who were sitting on the fence just a week or two ago are going to be in for quite a shock when they look at the new monthly cost of a house. 

Now, here is where “Davidson’s” comment on Bernanke comes in. Should Ben decide it is time to suck some liquidity out of the economy “due to its performance”, we would see a reversal of the the rate jump. That might also have the effect of spurring those folks on the house buying fence out there the rush out and pick one up as they fear additional rate increases. This would be good news.

The huge risk is “what if there really aren’t any buyers on the fence”? Rate increases will only serve in this case to deepen the problem and Bernanke’s withdrawing of liquidity would serve to further tighten lending.

What really needs to happen? We need some responsibility out of Congress and the White House. If we cannot get it then the bond folks will force it on them and in that case, options become very limited very fast. The first volley has been tossed, let’s see what happens now..


Disclosure (“none” means no position):

Categories
Articles

Thursday’s Links

TAX, Shorts, Audible, Girlfriends

– Maybe will not raise you income tax, but Obama is considering taxing everything else..

– Money to be made in lightly shorted stocks

– Audible book on the Blackberry

– Another Onion classic


Disclosure (“none” means no position):

Categories
Articles

Seth Klarman to Take Stake in Red Sox?

As if we did not have enough reasons to like Baupost Group’s Seth Klarman

From the Boston Globe:

Advertising mogul Ed Eskandarian is selling his minority stake in the Boston Red Sox to Seth Klarman, a well known Boston hedge fund manager, according to two people briefed on the transaction.

Eskandarian is one of a group of three Boston businessmen who together invested $25 million in the 2002 purchase of the Red Sox, led by John Henry and Tom Werner. Their stake at the time represented about 3.6 percent of the $700 million deal. Eskandarian, chairman of Arnold Worldwide, a Boston advertising agency, invested about $6 million.

Klarman and Eskandarian both declined to comment. The Red Sox also declined to comment.

However, by yesterday Eskandarian’s name had been removed from the list of owners posted on the team website. Klarman, who runs Baupost Group in Boston, is not listed as an owner. Major League Baseball must approve any change in team ownership.

The New York Times Co., which owns The Boston Globe, is trying to sell its 17.5 percent stake in the Red Sox. According to published reports, the Times Co. believes its stake is worth $200 million, which would value the team at $1.1 billion.

One of Eskandarian’s co-investors, TJX Cos. chairman Ben Cammarata, sold his stake in the team in 2007. The third investor, former textile executive Martin Trust, remains an owner.

It could not be learned yesterday what price Eskandarian is getting for his share. Cammarata, reached by telephone yesterday, said he did not know what a Red Sox stake would fetch today. He would not say how much he sold his $12.5 million stake for: “It was a wonderful time and a very good investment.”

The Red Sox franchise has risen in value, to $833 million, according to rankings created by Forbes magazine each year. The Red Sox are the third most valuable team in baseball, behind the New York Yankees and the New York Mets.

When David D’Alessandro, the former chief executive of John Hancock Financial Services Inc., sold his $5 million stake in the team in 2007, he reaped just over double his original investment, $10.3 million, the Globe reported.


Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long Red Sox

Categories
Articles

Borders Still Progressing…..

Smaller operating loss, increased cash flows and 45% less debt, all very good things. Shareholders, unfortunately for those who bought shares 2 years ago are still paying for the sins of past management. But, this marks the third consecutive quarter of very good improvement in a dismal operating environment.

Work still needs to be done on Borders.com. The site is sluggish and ordering can be difficult. Customer service is responsive BUT, Borders needs to eliminate the necessity to even need them which seems to be all too frequent. On the positive side, the site is very visually appealing and the Rewards Program and the affiliate relationships do offer tremendous savings. But, to bring it to the next level as a destination purchasing site…..it needs to be faster….much faster and the ordering glitches need to be eliminated.

Borders Group Q1

Publish at Scribd or explore others: Finance Business & Law borders group


Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long BGP

Categories
Articles

"Regulate": Warren Buffett Rap $$

Some humor….Hat Tip Reader Jeff for finding & emailing..


Disclosure (“none” means no position):

Categories
Articles

David Rosenberg on the "End of the Recession" (video)

Interview and discussion with David Rosenberg of the Gluskin Sheff & Associates on both Fox Biz and Bloomberg. He talks about the comments from Krugman and Greenspan.

Rosenberg is one of the few that have nailed everything to date. Whether you agree with him or not, you must take his thoughts with a huge grain of salt. He also boosts his cause in my eyes as not being as dire as either Roubini or Taleb who seem to call for the “end of days” on a regular basis. Rosenberg is far more rational.



Disclosure (“none” means no position):

Categories
Articles

Housing: The 90’s Revisited and A Look at Today $$

After having spoken about the “time factor” in housing so much recently, I decided to put some hard data to the words. 

Here is my appearance on Wall St. Media yesterday on the subject (housing comes in about 1/2 way though)

Below is the Case-Shiller housing data going back to Jan. 1987.  It is reflective of the housing markets for Boston, New York, LA, San Diego, San Francisco and the 10 City Composite. I cannot use today’s 20 city data because back in the early 90’s only the 10 majors went into it. 
I have taken the liberty of highlighting in yellow both the peaks of the various markets and then again when price finally returned to those peaks. You’ll notice both for the cities and the overall composite, the basic take-away is that housing peaked in 1990 and it took until 1997 for prices to return to those levels.
Here is the bad news and yes, it gets worse than waiting the assumed 7 years for your home to be worth what it was in the spring of 2006, the most recent market peak (purple highlight). Notice the degree of decline in the 1990’s?  Nationally peak to trough it was basically 8%-9% and in the select cities it averaged about 15%. 
Where are we now? Over 30% Nationally and as much as 40% in the major cities with more downside in store. If it took 7 years to return from far milder events in the 1990’s than the ones currently being experienced, do we really think housing will return from this before 2013 (7 years peak to peak as in the 90’s)? Do we really?
Still using the most recent housing bust as a guide we find that for the most part the bottoms in all the markets and Nationally came 4-6 years after the peak. Translated to today that again means we will not actually bottom until the Spring 2010-2012.  Another year of falling prices, at least.

Open spreadhseet in another window

One also has to remember for the majority of the 1990’s we were not facing a recession anywhere near as severe as we are today.  Unemployment at its worst was 5% to 6%, roughly 1/2 of what we ought to see before this recession is over. According to the Mortage Bankers Association nationally “the percentage of loans in the foreclosure process at the end of the second quarter was 2.75 percent, an increase of 28 basis points from the first quarter of 2008 and 135 basis points from one year ago.” Oh, in the 1990’s? That percentage peaked at .35% (read it right, “point” 35%, not 35%).

Those facts alone, even if we disregard the severity of the price fall in housing would tend to force most folks to push the bottom of the current situation out a bit further. When you add the wealth destruction that has happened to healthy homeowners who may have been looking to scoop a bargain but no longer have equity to roll, we are further suppressing demand.


Disclosure (“none” means no position):