Why? Think about it. What is the rational for the Fed raising rates? To slow the economy by reducing credit. Well, I’m not sure about about you but from what I am seeing, that is already happening. One could make the argument and be very accurate in doing so that the current credit environment is far in excess (in its restrictiveness) when compared to the 2% Fed funds rate.
Raising rates in the current situation when placed in a risk reward scenario doesn’t work. The risk that a rate increase would push a teetering economy into recession outweighs any inflation decrease you may get.
We do not need to slow down growth to fight inflation now. When you look at it, we really do not have any real growth to slow down. Q1 GDP was .9%. That really leaves very little room for error.
The singular problem here is commodities driven by demand for food and fuel and stagnant supply. A .25 point rate increase will change neither. When one looks around the world currently we have US gas demand falling over 2% vs last year, China is reducing fuel subsidies (will raise domestic prices there and kill demand) and other nations are considering the same. US consumers are not buying SUV’s and trucks and replacing them with smaller cars and even motorcycles. The effects of those actions on gas and oil (USO) demand will be felt down the road.
Before Bernanke can begin raising rate he needs to be sure the US is not slipping into recession. Despite what people are saying, we are in a recession when we are, not when “it feels like we are” or the media proclaims one. That being said, according to the data, we are not even as of yet in the beginning of one. Now, if Q2 GDP slips into the negative, then we may actually have a modest one. Should it come in flat, then we most likely will escape it. Bernanke will not raise rates until he has more clarity.
This meeting will feature no change in the Fed funds rate and a change in the statement saying future action are tilted towards fighting inflation and a rate increase.
The good news here is that the move is being done to “restore margins” and the previous 20% increases have stuck.
Watch CEO Andrew Liveris this morning on CNBC. He reinforces many of the same things we spoke about in my interview with him earlier this month.
Part 1:
Part 2:
Bottom line, Liveris is going to deliver earnings for shareholders in the long run. If that means he has to restrict supply and raise prices he will. If means he has to move production to nations that offer cheaper inputs for his products, he will (and is).
Short run, it will not be very pretty. You do not raise prices 35% to 45% on all product lines and reduce output in a month for any other reason than things are real tough. Liveris said as much in the CNBC interview when he said “we are fighting for our lives in the trenches right now”. Current estimates are for $.92 a share for Q2, do not expect that to be hit.
Perhaps it is me, but, Dow below $36 a share? Should it happen I will not be able to resist buying more. It has only hit that level twice since 2003, I will be buying.
What we are seeing simply is the result of years of Congressional neglect on energy coming home to roost. Congressional drilling bans, restrictions, refining permitting nightmares and the list goes on and on. It take 3.5 years to get a nuke plant approved in the US, a joke.
We have enough natural gas off our coasts to power us for generations but we are restricted from getting it. Want to save on oil? Lower the natural gas price so far below that of oil (by adding supply) and watch the millions of homes in the northeast that heat with oil, using over a thousand gallons each during a typical winter make the switch to natural gas to heat their homes.
Until that time, we are going to have to get used to higher prices for petroleum products, which, unfortunately cover a huge swath of the good we use daily.
The good news for Dow shareholders? Kuwait and Saudi JV’s. These price increases will stick and when production is moved to the Saudi and Kuwait facilities, Dow will be getting “the milk from the cow, not the farmer”. Essentially the equation enables Dow to get oil at below market prices and sell the finished good at market rates, expanding profits and margins. The other option, since input prices are lower, is keeping margins the same and sell finished good below market prices and capture share.
Either way, shareholders win big, eventually…
PS. On another note, how about Liveris standing there for not one but two interviews on CNBC today to announce the news? It was not some middle of the night press release followed by a “no comment” from management. Typical Liveris, “this is the deal and what we are doing about it” (quotes mine). You can count the number of CEO’s who do that on one hand.
For all his honesty and forthrightness regarding Dow, you would think more people would take what he says about the future of the company more seriously. No matter, either way, it will happen and by ignoring him, investors give me time to gobble up more shares, at a now rock solid 4.5% yield at sale prices….
Here is a great post over at Seeking Alpha that takes Jim Cramer and compares him to Ben Graham’s Mr. Market.
The genesis was this classic flip flop from Cramer a week ago. It is making waves thanks to Don Harrold who put it together. CNBC has to do something about this guy. He will single handily ruin the credibility of the whole network.
Here is a great post over at Seeking Alpha that takes Jim Cramer and compares him to Ben Graham’s Mr. Market.
The genesis was this classic flip flop from Cramer a week ago. It is making waves thanks to Don Harrold who put it together. CNBC has to do something about this guy. He will single handily ruin the credibility of the whole network.
You know, if Congress would just listen to Jackson and Dow’s (DOW) Andrew Liveris on energy, we would be so much farther along the road than we are now.
We recently took a long position in AutoNation (AN). This interview Jackson did was what got me really looking into the company and considering a purchase.
This is a multi-year bet as auto sales do not look to turn soon but the demand will continue to build and when it releases, profits ought to flow…
It should be noted that famed value investors like Leucadia (LUK), Berkshire’s Buffett (BRK.A) are buying into the sector as it troughs.
You know, if Congress would just listen to Jackson and Dow’s (DOW) Andrew Liveris on energy, we would be so much farther along the road than we are now.
We recently took a long position in AutoNation (AN). This interview Jackson did was what got me really looking into the company and considering a purchase.
This is a multi-year bet as auto sales do not look to turn soon but the demand will continue to build and when it releases, profits ought to flow…
It should be noted that famed value investors like Leucadia (LUK), Berkshire’s Buffett (BRK.A) are buying into the sector as it troughs.
While it may initially look a bad omen, the reality is that it is a very good move.
First, Marlboro and Marlboro Lights are the #1 cigarettes in the US, by a mile. Second, smoking is in decline and growth for the company will be had through increased market share of the above brands, cigars and smokeless products. Third where is the cash being used to develop and market this product better used?
This is where R&D dollars ought to be going. The company expects overall cigarette sales to fall at an annual rate of 2.5 percent to 3 percent in coming years. At the same time the smokeless market is experiencing growth of about the same percentage.
The move is a common sense one. Place dollars into a growth area vs a declining one. Eliminating smooth will have no negative effect on Marlboro sales for the company and having the flexibility to accelerate the smokeless products can only help.