Categories
Articles

ESL / Autozone Agreement Filed with SEC

Here are the applicable portions.

Section 3.1 New Directors.

In accordance with the provisions of this Article III, the Company shall take appropriate actions, once nominees are identified satisfying the requirements of Section 3.2, to add three (3) new members to the Board (the “New Directors”). It is the intent of the parties that such additions shall occur as promptly as practicable, but in no case later than the Company’s 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Section 3.2 Selection of New Directors.

(a) An independent search agency has been engaged to identify a nominee for one (1) of the New Director positions (the “Specified Director”) pursuant to criteria previously determined by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and all of the directors shall be permitted to propose persons as suggested candidates for the Specified Director to such independent search agency. A candidate identified shall be considered by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in accordance with its regular policies and procedures, which shall include, without limitation, consideration of such candidate’s background, competencies and experience. A candidate shall be recommended by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee as a nominee for election by the Board as the Specified Director only if he or she is (a) deemed to be “independent” pursuant to the Company’s corporate governance principles and the rules and regulations of the New York Stock Exchange and (b) reasonably acceptable to both ESL and a majority of the members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Only a nominee who is recommended by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee shall be presented to the Board as a potential nominee for election as the Specified Director.

(b) Two (2) New Directors (the “Non-Specified Directors”) shall be appointed from nominees identified by ESL, including persons suggested by other directors to ESL who are reasonably acceptable to ESL (any such person, a “Candidate”). Each Candidate identified shall be considered by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in accordance with its regular policies and procedures, which shall include, without limitation, consideration of such Candidate’s background, competencies, experience and affiliation with ESL (if any). Only candidates which are reasonably acceptable to both ESL and a majority of the members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may be recommended by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for election to the Board. Either or both of the two Candidates may, at ESL’s discretion, be an officer of ESL and its affiliated investment entities. Each candidate shall qualify as “independent” pursuant to the Company’s corporate governance principles and the rules and regulations of the New York Stock Exchange. The Company will use its reasonable best efforts to have the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee promptly recommend Candidates for election to the Board once candidates are identified satisfying the requirements above.

(c) Subject to the nomination of directors in accordance with the provisions of Section 3.2(a) and 3.2(b), the Company’s Board of Directors shall promptly take all action required to cause the Specified Director and Non-Specified Directors to be so elected.

Section 6.3 Future Sales and/or Transactions Involving an Acquisition of the Company.

(a) ESL shall not dispose or agree to dispose of any shares of Common Stock pursuant to any agreement, arrangement or understanding (whether or not in writing), including by way of merger or other business combination, at a price above the market price per share prevailing at the time of such agreement, arrangement or understanding, without taking appropriate steps to ensure that the purchaser of such shares simultaneously provides all other holders of Common Stock with an opportunity to dispose of a number of shares (representing, for each Company stockholder, the same proportion of owned shares of Common Stock as ESL proposes to dispose of) in such transaction on the same terms and conditions, including price per share, as ESL. It is understood that (i) sales in the open market shall be deemed to be at prevailing market prices and (ii) (a) the transfer of Shares of Common Stock from one ESL affiliate subject to this Agreement to another, (b) distributions by ESL to its shareholders or limited partners, and (c) sales to the Company or third parties approved by at least two directors representing a majority of the independent, disinterested directors unaffiliated with ESL, shall not constitute a disposition subject to this Section 6.3(a).

(b) ESL shall not pursue, either directly or indirectly, including as part of a group, a transaction resulting in the acquisition of all or substantially all of the shares of Common Stock not owned by ESL or by such group (including, for example, in a leveraged recap in which “stub equity” is left in the hands of some or all of the non-ESL stockholders) unless the following procedures and requirements are followed and satisfied. The Board shall establish a committee of independent, disinterested directors unaffiliated with ESL (the “Special Committee”) to review and evaluate any transaction (other than any such transaction in which ESL would be treated on the same basis as all other Company stockholders) proposed by ESL or in which ESL intends to participate, with full authority to negotiate and recommend the terms of such a transaction on behalf of the Company and the non-ESL stockholders. ESL will proceed only with a transaction recommended by the Special Committee, unless the acquisition is structured as a “non-coercive” tender offer, followed by a merger at the same price if the offer is successful, not subject to the test of “entire fairness” in accordance with applicable Delaware case law (e.g., the decisions involving Silconix and Pure Resources), assuming, for these purposes, that the Company had been incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware and was subject to Delaware law.

(c) The provisions of this Section 6.3 may be enforced by any directors constituting a majority of the independent, disinterested directors unaffiliated with ESL or, in the absence of any such persons sitting on the Board, through a derivative action.

Section 6.4 Information Regarding Common Stock.

If ESL increases or decreases the number of Subject Shares it owns at any time prior to the Termination Date, ESL shall give prompt notice to the Company of such increase or decrease (which notice may be satisfied by a filing of a Form 4 with the Securities and Exchange Commission on a timely basis). If requested by ESL, the Company shall promptly provide ESL with the number of Outstanding Shares.

Section 8.1 Termination.

This Agreement and all of its provisions shall terminate upon the Termination Date; provided that Sections 8.3, 8.4, 8.5, 8.7, 8.8, 8.9, 8.10, 8.13 and, in the case of clause (b) below, 6.3 of this Agreement shall survive any termination of this Agreement. For purposes of this Agreement, “Termination Date” means the earliest of (a) the date upon which the Subject Shares shall, in the aggregate, constitute less than 25% of the Outstanding Shares, (b) the date upon which the Aggregate ESL Percentage shall exceed 50% and (c) the date upon which the Parties (which, in the case of the Company, shall have been authorized by at least two directors representing a majority of the independent and disinterested members of the Board unaffiliated with ESL) mutually agree in writing that this Agreement and all of its provisions shall no longer be in effect. Nothing in this Section 8.1 shall be deemed to release any Party from any liability for any breach by such Party of their representations and warranties or any other terms and provisions of this Agreement.

Full Filing

Disclosure (“none” means no position):None

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Borders (BGP) CEO George Jones (video)

This was an interesting interview of the Borders (BGP) CEO and unfortunately way too short..

Jones talks about the consumer, the new direction, Barners & Noble (BKS) and other possible buyers.

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long BGP, none

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

More on Lampert’s AutoZone (AZO) Agreement

I posted the agreement between Eddie Lampert and Autozone (AZO) this morning and got a flood of questions. Reader Jeff answered 90% of them with this post.

“EBITDAR- Earnings Before Dep./Amor, Interest, Taxes, Rent (lease payments).

Thus, the company can take on long term debt of 2.5x its annual EBITDAR. Relatively modest leverage.

The voting restriction for ESL is basically saying that, if he continues to accumulate, the shares he gets over a certain level (40% now, coming down to 37.5%), he will need to vote them in proportion to how the rest of AZO’s shareholders vote.

So, if all non-ESL shareholders vote 50/50, in aggregate, ESL will be required to vote any of its shares in excess of 40% 50/50 as well. This will stay in effect as long as ESL’s ownership remains in the range of 25% – 50%.

So Lampert gets his wish that they continue to recap a bit, taking on more leverage and buying back more shares, in exchange for some voting concessions.”

Now, something interesting. With the new repurchase allotment, Autozone will be repurchasing 8% of the outstanding shares. By default, this will bring Lampert’s ownership up to 44.2% without him buying another share.

That will leave 5.8% (338 thousand shares) left for him to purchase in order for him to invalidate the agreement and vote his shares as he wishes because he will then own 50% of the shares.

One had to wonder then, what is the point of the agreement? Was Lampert pushing for something now and has decided to back off in return for an 8% ownership increase via the repurchase?

It is the only explanation as the agreement simply by itself, for no alternative reason makes no sense and is meaningless.

Something is going on….

Ideas?

Disclosure (“none” means no position):None

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

More on Lampert's AutoZone (AZO) Agreement

I posted the agreement between Eddie Lampert and Autozone (AZO) this morning and got a flood of questions. Reader Jeff answered 90% of them with this post.

“EBITDAR- Earnings Before Dep./Amor, Interest, Taxes, Rent (lease payments).

Thus, the company can take on long term debt of 2.5x its annual EBITDAR. Relatively modest leverage.

The voting restriction for ESL is basically saying that, if he continues to accumulate, the shares he gets over a certain level (40% now, coming down to 37.5%), he will need to vote them in proportion to how the rest of AZO’s shareholders vote.

So, if all non-ESL shareholders vote 50/50, in aggregate, ESL will be required to vote any of its shares in excess of 40% 50/50 as well. This will stay in effect as long as ESL’s ownership remains in the range of 25% – 50%.

So Lampert gets his wish that they continue to recap a bit, taking on more leverage and buying back more shares, in exchange for some voting concessions.”

Now, something interesting. With the new repurchase allotment, Autozone will be repurchasing 8% of the outstanding shares. By default, this will bring Lampert’s ownership up to 44.2% without him buying another share.

That will leave 5.8% (338 thousand shares) left for him to purchase in order for him to invalidate the agreement and vote his shares as he wishes because he will then own 50% of the shares.

One had to wonder then, what is the point of the agreement? Was Lampert pushing for something now and has decided to back off in return for an 8% ownership increase via the repurchase?

It is the only explanation as the agreement simply by itself, for no alternative reason makes no sense and is meaningless.

Something is going on….

Ideas?

Disclosure (“none” means no position):None

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Autozone (AZO) Increases Buyback, Reaches Agreement with Lampert

AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) today announced that its Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of an additional $500 million of the Company’s stock, bringing its current unused repurchase authorization to $608 million. Including the additional authorization, the cumulative share repurchase authorization approved by its Board since 1998 totals $6.4 billion.

Additionally, as part of the Company’s ongoing evaluation of its capital structure, the Company has decided to increase its adjusted debt / EBITDAR leverage metric to at least 2.5x from the previously established 2.1x. The Company believes this will better optimize its current capital structure and also reflect the ongoing strength of its free cash flow generation.

AutoZone also announced that it has entered into an agreement with ESL Investments, Inc. (with its affiliates, “ESL”) setting forth certain understandings and agreements concerning ESL’s continued investment in AutoZone. ESL currently owns approximately 36.2% of the outstanding AutoZone common stock. Pursuant to the agreement with ESL, the Company has agreed to use its commercially reasonable efforts to achieve at least the new 2.5x adjusted debt / EBITDAR leverage metric by the end of the Company’s second quarter fiscal 2009.

“We are very pleased to have reached this agreement with our long-term and significant stockholder, ESL, which was motivated, by our desire to continue to return excess capital to stockholders in the context of appropriate, mutually agreed governance arrangements,” said Bill Rhodes AutoZone’s Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. “We appreciate ESL’s belief in the Company and its management over the past eleven years and look forward to its continued involvement in helping us achieve our goals for the benefit of all stockholders.”

The agreement with ESL provides, among other things, that, should ESL’s percentage ownership of Company shares increase above certain thresholds, ESL will vote its shares owned above such thresholds in the same proportion as shares unaffiliated with ESL are actually voted. The initial threshold is 40%, which will reduce to 37.5% following the 2009 annual meeting of stockholders. The agreement also states the Company’s intention to add three directors in the near future, two of whom will be identified by ESL for consideration by the Company’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, thereby increasing the Board’s size to 12 members. Thereafter, the Company expects to reduce the Board’s size to 10 members in conjunction with the 2008 annual meeting in December. The agreement also contains certain other protections for non-ESL affiliated shareholders as well as for ESL.

The agreement with ESL or certain of its provisions will terminate, except as the parties otherwise mutually agree, upon the earlier of the date upon which the shares (a) owned by ESL constitute less than 25% of the then outstanding shares or (b) owned by ESL constitute more than 50% of the then outstanding shares, provided that ESL has acquired subsequent to the date of the agreement additional shares representing above 10% of the then outstanding shares.

Disclosure (“none” means no position):None

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Will This Be Six Flags (SIX) Last Summer?

I started following the soon to be doomed park operator after a trip there last year. After a recent Hershey Park vacation, I am even more convinced they are done…

After large shareholders began selling and management began blaming god for poor results, I couldn’t wait for the latest excuse. Fortunately, you really only need wait a quarter.

At least they have begun to attempt some honesty with shareholders. Although, they still are blowing smoke up investors…well…

Dealscape Reports:
“The second-largest U.S. amusement park company, Six Flags Inc. (SIX), has been on a downhill ride over the last decade with its latest twist, a downgrade to selective default from CCC+ by Standard & Poor’s.

The move highlights the financial woes Six Flags has been suffering as the company has been hit hard by the slowing economy, particularly impacted by the rising price of gas, and intense competition from other forms of entertainment. The company has tried to save money with its recent move of exchanging $530.6 million in notes due in 2010, 2013 and 2014 for $400 million in bonds maturing in 2016, resulting in a net savings of $130 million. Additionally, the company has divested and closed some of its properties to free up more cash.

Despite these measures, Six Flags has not been able to stop the trend of losing money every year since 1998, plagued with a massive debt load of more than $2 billion due to overexpansion. With all the financial pressures that Six Flags has been experiencing, the only remedy for the theme park operator may be a merger with a stronger partner. However, when rival Cedar Fair Entertainment Co.(FUN) tested the M&A waters last year, it found no takers. So Six Flags’ ride may end in bankruptcy”

Six Flags is the only company I have ever seen that has a debt level ($2.3 billion) that is 14 times larger than it market cap ($160 million). Stunning….

Good news is that at $1.60 a share, you can skip a soda at the park and pick up three shares for the cost of the soda. Although, the soda at least will give you some enjoyment.

I do not buy the recent excuse du jour, gas prices. If anything, the regional parks ought to benefit as people will not travel long distances for vacations but seem more likely to do the day trip that is Six Flags. Witness this report

What is the problem? Simple really. A lousy experience that lacks any value.

Until that changes, expect nothing but more excuses, until the end, which, may not be much longer..

Disclosure (“none” means no position):none

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Starbucks Ditches CD’s: What Took So Long?

I thought this was a goner months ago?

Starbucks has perhaps realized it is not an entertainment company, but a coffee chain? By September, it is rumored the company will eliminate retail CDs sales in stores. Starbucks will offer just four CDs per store rather than the racks offering multiple CD choices customers currently there.

Starbucks says it was selling more than 4 million CDs a year. Now, if we divide it by the 14,000 location we get and average of 285 CDs per location or less than one a day. Why wasn’t this killed, oh maybe a year ago?

Now it isn’t clear if Starbucks is going to kill the whole division or not. It should. It is sucking resources and funds that ought to being put to better use. Maybe a dividend? Payoff some debt, now at $500 million vs less than $2 million a year ago? Maybe?

Over a year ago we first looked at this in a post and at least now they at least seem to be getting the point.

Now let’s not get all excited and run out and buy shares. Unless Starbucks axes the whole division, the move is just a drop in the bucket. At least if they nix it, we can then at least say they are getting things together. In now way does that constitute a reason to buy shares.

Far more needs to be done……….

Disclosure (“none” means no position):None

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Starbucks Ditches CD's: What Took So Long?

I thought this was a goner months ago?

Starbucks has perhaps realized it is not an entertainment company, but a coffee chain? By September, it is rumored the company will eliminate retail CDs sales in stores. Starbucks will offer just four CDs per store rather than the racks offering multiple CD choices customers currently there.

Starbucks says it was selling more than 4 million CDs a year. Now, if we divide it by the 14,000 location we get and average of 285 CDs per location or less than one a day. Why wasn’t this killed, oh maybe a year ago?

Now it isn’t clear if Starbucks is going to kill the whole division or not. It should. It is sucking resources and funds that ought to being put to better use. Maybe a dividend? Payoff some debt, now at $500 million vs less than $2 million a year ago? Maybe?

Over a year ago we first looked at this in a post and at least now they at least seem to be getting the point.

Now let’s not get all excited and run out and buy shares. Unless Starbucks axes the whole division, the move is just a drop in the bucket. At least if they nix it, we can then at least say they are getting things together. In now way does that constitute a reason to buy shares.

Far more needs to be done……….

Disclosure (“none” means no position):None

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Thursday’s Links

Fisher, SNS & SHLD, Gas, Google

– Phil was one of the greats

Some thoughts

– Demand is falling

– Who to believe?

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Thursday's Links

Fisher, SNS & SHLD, Gas, Google

– Phil was one of the greats

Some thoughts

– Demand is falling

– Who to believe?

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Hershey Needs Tootsie

So, if Hershey (HSY) is not going to be sold, it needs to acquire to keep pace with the new Mars & Wrigley (WWY) combo.

Recently Hershey reaffirmed its fiscal 2008 guidance and expects net sales growth to be in the range of 3%-4% and earnings per share-diluted from operations (EPS) to be $1.85-$1.90. They reported revenue of $4.9 billion in fiscal 2007. According to Reuters Estimates, analysts on average are expecting the Company to report revenue of $5.1 billion in the same period.

On another note:
Gene Marcial, Business Week’s Inside Wall Street Columnist, says Tootsie Roll is a buyout candidate:

Here is a review of the article:
1. Though the company has not performed well lately, as first-quarter sales tumbled, costs spiraled higher, and earnings are on a downward slope.

2. However, the “smart-money crowd” is starting to gather in the stock. That has lifted Tootsie’s share price since late April, when the stock traded at $23. It sprinted up to $27 by early June, where it has remained.

3. Tootsie Roll possesses many of the ingredients that make it a palatable buyout target; the company certainly needs new energy to spark a lift in sales, earnings, and stock price. And Tootsie Roll’s management hasn’t displayed the skills to improve the company in the current environment of rising commodity prices and stiffening competition.

4. Tootsie Roll’s chairman and CEO is now 88, and his wife, the company’s president and chief operating officer, is 76. They control some 76% of the class B voting stock and 54% of the common shares of the Chicago-based company, so the question of a hostile or unsolicited takeover at the Chicago-based company seems out of the question.

5. According to Mario Gabelli, “It looks like a sale will happen, although the big question is when.” Other big shareholders include Wells Capital Management, with a stake of 9.5%, T. Rowe Price (TROW), which holds a nearly 5% position, and Barclays Global Investors (BCS), with 4.3%.

6. Tootsie Roll is a well-recognized brand name, the balance sheet is strong with understated assets, cash flow, and dividend. But, earnings have been flat for years. And, that might attract its bigger rivals, which could see the prospect of rewarding synergies and potential growth in combining with Tootsie Roll. Such larger competitors include Hershey (HER), Mars and Wrigley (WWY).

Hershey needs to expand its offering and Tootsie Roll is both ripe for buying and an iconic brand to add to the stable. Even after the recent price increase. Tootsie sports a valuation of only 1.5 billion, roughly 1/4 that of Hershey.

One has to think that what Hershey would want is the name, close some outdated production facilities and consolidate operations and cost saving would surely be available.

PS. On a side note. A recent vacation to Hershey Park with the kids was a smashing success. First class amenities and and fantastic park. Not a single complaint to be had other than wishing we had chosen to spent more time there. Maybe next year….

Disclosure (“none” means no position):None

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Thursday’s Upgrades and Downgrades


UPGRADES
Atwood Oceanics (ATW)- Credit Suisse Underperform » Neutral
Pier 1 Imports (PIR)- DA Davidson Neutral » Buy
Spherion (SFN)- CL King Neutral » Strong Buy
Greif (GEF)- Janney Mntgmy Scott Neutral » Buy
Yahoo! (YHOO)- Canaccord Adams Sell » Hold
Ameristar Casinos (ASCA)- Morgan Joseph Sell » Hold
National Penn (NPBC)- Boenning & Scattergood Market Perform » Market Outperform
Polo Ralph Lauren (RL)- Morgan Keegan Underperform » Mkt Perform
NASDAQ (NDAQ)- Piper Jaffray Neutral » Buy
Nelnet (NNI)- Friedman Billings Mkt Perform » Outperform
Winn-Dixie Stores (WINN)- Friedman Billings Mkt Perform » Outperform
Regal Entertainment (RGC)- BMO Capital Markets Market Perform » Outperform
Atlas Pipeline (APL)- Citigroup Hold » Buy
AT&T (T)- Bernstein Mkt Perform » Outperform
Ashland (ASH)- JP Morgan Underweight » Neutral
TIBCO Software (TIBX)- JP Morgan Neutral » Overweight
A. Schulman (SHLM)- KeyBanc Capital Mkts Hold » Buy

DOWNGRADES
Barrier Therapeutics (BTRX)- Roth Capital Buy » Hold
Aurora Oil & Gas (AOG)- Jefferies & Co Hold » Underperform
NY Comm Bancrp (NYB)- Citigroup Buy » Hold
Syniverse Holdings (SVR)- Robert W. Baird Outperform » Neutral
Arch Chemicals (ARJ)- Oppenheimer Outperform » Perform
RPM Inc (RPM)- KeyBanc Capital Mkts Buy » Hold

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Thursday's Upgrades and Downgrades


UPGRADES
Atwood Oceanics (ATW)- Credit Suisse Underperform » Neutral
Pier 1 Imports (PIR)- DA Davidson Neutral » Buy
Spherion (SFN)- CL King Neutral » Strong Buy
Greif (GEF)- Janney Mntgmy Scott Neutral » Buy
Yahoo! (YHOO)- Canaccord Adams Sell » Hold
Ameristar Casinos (ASCA)- Morgan Joseph Sell » Hold
National Penn (NPBC)- Boenning & Scattergood Market Perform » Market Outperform
Polo Ralph Lauren (RL)- Morgan Keegan Underperform » Mkt Perform
NASDAQ (NDAQ)- Piper Jaffray Neutral » Buy
Nelnet (NNI)- Friedman Billings Mkt Perform » Outperform
Winn-Dixie Stores (WINN)- Friedman Billings Mkt Perform » Outperform
Regal Entertainment (RGC)- BMO Capital Markets Market Perform » Outperform
Atlas Pipeline (APL)- Citigroup Hold » Buy
AT&T (T)- Bernstein Mkt Perform » Outperform
Ashland (ASH)- JP Morgan Underweight » Neutral
TIBCO Software (TIBX)- JP Morgan Neutral » Overweight
A. Schulman (SHLM)- KeyBanc Capital Mkts Hold » Buy

DOWNGRADES
Barrier Therapeutics (BTRX)- Roth Capital Buy » Hold
Aurora Oil & Gas (AOG)- Jefferies & Co Hold » Underperform
NY Comm Bancrp (NYB)- Citigroup Buy » Hold
Syniverse Holdings (SVR)- Robert W. Baird Outperform » Neutral
Arch Chemicals (ARJ)- Oppenheimer Outperform » Perform
RPM Inc (RPM)- KeyBanc Capital Mkts Buy » Hold

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

CNBC’s Phil Lebeau: Now One of My Favorite Bloggers

Why?

For this reason:

Not that he supports Ford (F) or GM (GM) but that he calls out Cramer…

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

CNBC's Phil Lebeau: Now One of My Favorite Bloggers

Why?

For this reason:

Not that he supports Ford (F) or GM (GM) but that he calls out Cramer…

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books