Categories
Articles

Saks Reports June Sales

Here is the release from Saks:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

www.saksincorporated.com
New York, New York (July 9, 2009)—Retailer Saks Incorporated (NYSE: SKS) (the “Company”) today announced that owned sales totaled $230.2 million for the five weeks ended July 4, 2009 compared to $239.3 million for the five weeks ended July 5, 2008, a 3.8% decrease. Comparable store sales decreased 4.4% for the month.

On a quarter-to-date basis, for the two months ended July 4, 2009, owned sales totaled $396.2 million compared to $463.2 million for the two months ended July 5, 2008, a 14.5% decrease. Comparable store sales decreased 15.2% for the two-month period.

On a year-to-date basis, for the five months ended July 4, 2009, owned sales totaled $1,011.3 million compared to $1,305.7 million for the five months ended July 5, 2008, a 22.5% decrease. Comparable store sales decreased 23.2% for the five-month period.
June sales performance was positively affected by the shift of a designer sale event into June this year from May last year. Management continues to estimate that comparable store sales will decline in the mid-teen range for the second fiscal quarter.

The Saks Fifth Avenue stores experienced continued weakness across all merchandise categories during the month. Saks Direct showed relative strength in June.
Prior year numbers have been adjusted to remove the sales of the Company’s discontinued Club Libby Lu operations.

Saks Incorporated operates 53 Saks Fifth Avenue stores, 54 Saks OFF 5TH stores, and saks.com.

Here is the original investment thesis for Sakes (SKS).

Now at first blush, the numbers seemed great and then when folks realized the Fashion event was moved into June from May last year, shares tanked today. This was fine by me because after initially buying then at $3.75, I sold them a week later at $4.55. Note: I rarely take positions for that short a time frame but at the time I wanted to free up some capital and was happy to take a 21% week’s gain, expecting the price to retreat again.

I still wanted to own shares and being able to buy them today at an average price of $4.37 is a price I’m happy to own shares at.

Now, was the month and quarter to date as good/bad as it looks? June was clearly not as good sue to the changing of the Fashion event. Now as for the quarter to date, comps just may not be as bad as may seem. Remember at this year last time the government was mailingout stimulus checks to an estimated 130 million people/families. The average family of 4 got a check for $1800. Yes I know we recently had another stimulus but the current one, only 11% completed does not mail checks directly to consumers to use but at this point has been primarily mailed to state and local government to use. It clearly has had no “stimulating” effect.

Opinions vary as to how much of 2008 payments found their way into the economy vs what was saved/used to pay off bills but it is safe to say that retail received a decent chunk of it. In that respect, 2008’s spring/early summer results were skewed higher that otherwise would have been. Another bright sign is that while the YTD sales decline ins in the 20% range, the monthly’s seem to be in the 12%-15% range which does show some lessing of the decline.

This is not to say by any means that today’s results were good. It is to say that they were not quite as bad as an initial look may seem and for those of us planning to hold shares through an improvement, the trend is definitely in the right direction.

Any retail reversal will be a year in the making. But, if we want to be taking positions at bottom prices, we cannot wait for clear signs it is happening. By then the $4 stock you are looking at today will be a $10 stock and you will have missed a huge percentage of the appreciation.


Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long SKS

Categories
Articles

Russia: Gov't Administration of Oil Markets "Impossible"

Why is it Russia, of all nation’s gets this and we seemingly don’t?

Note: the government defines “speculators” as “investors who do not use or produce commodities but are primarily interested in betting on prices”. In other words…..just about everyone…


Here is CNBC on the subject:


Now, watch the following video. Trader Randy Rothberg talks about the fall he sees coming in oil (USO).

Notice his arguments. Gas demand and Nigerian political risk. Those two variable are huge in the bigger picture for oil (USO) prices. Depending on your view of those two, you will either be a buyer or seller of oil at these prices. It isn’t “speculation” in the sense it is used but a purchase or sale decision based on future expectations.

On another note. Have you notice that when either gas/oil prices rise or the stock market falls it is due to “speculators” but when oil/gas (UNG) prices fall or the stock market rises (two things gov’t wants to happen) it is due to “investor sentiment”?

Be very careful when policy is being pushed simply because we do not like the outcome. It should be the process that is important..



Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long UNG, none

Categories
Articles

Russia: Gov’t Administration of Oil Markets “Impossible”

Why is it Russia, of all nation’s gets this and we seemingly don’t?

Note: the government defines “speculators” as “investors who do not use or produce commodities but are primarily interested in betting on prices”. In other words…..just about everyone…


Here is CNBC on the subject:


Now, watch the following video. Trader Randy Rothberg talks about the fall he sees coming in oil (USO).

Notice his arguments. Gas demand and Nigerian political risk. Those two variable are huge in the bigger picture for oil (USO) prices. Depending on your view of those two, you will either be a buyer or seller of oil at these prices. It isn’t “speculation” in the sense it is used but a purchase or sale decision based on future expectations.

On another note. Have you notice that when either gas/oil prices rise or the stock market falls it is due to “speculators” but when oil/gas (UNG) prices fall or the stock market rises (two things gov’t wants to happen) it is due to “investor sentiment”?

Be very careful when policy is being pushed simply because we do not like the outcome. It should be the process that is important..



Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long UNG, none

Categories
Articles

More Attempted Gov't Market Manipulation

Didn’t we learn a thing or two last year when the SEC banned sort selling and the market continued to tank?

From the WSJ:

Oil-market analysts question the idea that speculative investments have pushed up prices. They attribute the current volatility to uncertain prospects for economic recovery, and the long-term rise to an oil industry that has struggled to boost supply in response to the surge in demand from China, India and other developing economies.

“The spread of daily oil-price movements around the monthly average is because no one has a clear expectation of what the future price is going to be,” said David Kirsch, an oil-market analyst at PFC Energy. “Putting limits on financial investment is only going to have a limited effect on overall volatility.”

In Congress, though, there is growing consensus that investors could be distorting prices. A recent report from the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations blamed speculators for driving up wheat prices in recent years, and recommended the CFTC enforce position limits on index traders in the wheat market.

In a statement, CFTC Chairman Gary Gensler said the agency will hold a public hearing to gather views from consumers, businesses and market participants on proposals to impose limits on trading in energy future contracts. The CFTC’s proposed rules would also require hedge funds and swap dealers to report holdings — including those traded over-the-counter and at overseas exchanges — in a separate and routine way.

Energy traders say they are concerned that the regulations could stunt trade, increase costs in the marketplace and potentially scare away some players. “Speculators play a crucial role in the futures market by providing liquidity to hedgers,” such as oil producers and airlines, said Addison Armstrong, director of exchange-traded markets at TFS Energy Futures, a Stamford, Conn., broker. “Traders don’t want rules that are going to change the game.”

The interventionism represents a significant shift for both the CFTC and the U.K. government, both of which have previously taken a more free-market approach and stopped short of calling for action on speculators. “Where there has been unfair speculation or abuse of the market then we would be prepared to act,” Mr. Brown said in a briefing with journalists.

Mr. Brown and his French counterpart called on the International Organization of Securities Regulators to look at improving transparency and the supervision of oil-futures markets. An umbrella organization for global securities regulators, IOSCO helps to set international standards and advises national bodies on regulation. In March, it set out guidelines on how regulators can beef up their supervision and enforcement of commodities.

The French and British leaders hope to get backing for their drive at the summit of the Group of Eight leading industrial countries that begins in Italy on Wednesday.

Politicians around the world are worried about the effect of rising oil prices on the recovery potential of their recession-hit economies. In recent weeks, companies in various industries have complained that the rise in oil prices has, or will, hurt their profits.

Can anyone define “speculators” for me? Can anyone tell me what the price of oil “should” be based on fundamentals? Can anyone tell me what variables go into that fundamental analysis?

I ask because I have no idea. Why?

The price of oil takes into account (among others):

  • Current supply/demand
  • Expected future supply/demand
  • Geo-political considerations (will Israel attack Iran, will Chavez nationalize every oil co. etc)
  • China’s future needs

Now, in order to be able to say “this is the what the fundamental price should be” means that we can answer those questions with a high degree of accuracy. If we are off, for example on what the future demand will be based on US consumption in November, than the current price of oil is either too low or too high.

Since we know the quality of economic predictions decreases as the time from their date increases, how can we really with any type of intellectual honesty say “demand will be x” in November or early next year?

If I think it is going to be 10% higher than today an I buy the ETF USO to have exposure to oil, does that make me a “oil speculator” or an “investor” because I view the current price as too low based on my expected future fundamentals?

The problems the abound. First we have what seems to be a discernible trend to demonizing a group of people because we do not like the outcome and because it helps the government take action. Second, there is the arrogant opinion that the government can fix all ills and dictate the actions of the market. Third, this will fail because when investors are not able with confidence to understand the rules under which they invest, markets breakdown.

We saw proof of this last year with the short selling ban. Investor confidence fled and while there was no short selling, there were also no buyers due to this lack of confidence. What happened next that as prices fell, the selling of shareholders increased and the lack of buyers caused markets to crater.

What will happen to this current proposed rule? Well, the easy thing would be for the UNG/USO ETF’s to simply split. Place 1/2 of assets in a separate entity, tied to the same commodity and then rule averted because no one entity would control too much of the futures market. Has anything fundamentally changed? Nope

The only thing different would be yet another reason for investors to fear the market and what government may decide to do to it on any given day….that is the worst thing of all .


Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long UNG, none

Categories
Articles

More Attempted Gov’t Market Manipulation

Didn’t we learn a thing or two last year when the SEC banned sort selling and the market continued to tank?

From the WSJ:

Oil-market analysts question the idea that speculative investments have pushed up prices. They attribute the current volatility to uncertain prospects for economic recovery, and the long-term rise to an oil industry that has struggled to boost supply in response to the surge in demand from China, India and other developing economies.

“The spread of daily oil-price movements around the monthly average is because no one has a clear expectation of what the future price is going to be,” said David Kirsch, an oil-market analyst at PFC Energy. “Putting limits on financial investment is only going to have a limited effect on overall volatility.”

In Congress, though, there is growing consensus that investors could be distorting prices. A recent report from the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations blamed speculators for driving up wheat prices in recent years, and recommended the CFTC enforce position limits on index traders in the wheat market.

In a statement, CFTC Chairman Gary Gensler said the agency will hold a public hearing to gather views from consumers, businesses and market participants on proposals to impose limits on trading in energy future contracts. The CFTC’s proposed rules would also require hedge funds and swap dealers to report holdings — including those traded over-the-counter and at overseas exchanges — in a separate and routine way.

Energy traders say they are concerned that the regulations could stunt trade, increase costs in the marketplace and potentially scare away some players. “Speculators play a crucial role in the futures market by providing liquidity to hedgers,” such as oil producers and airlines, said Addison Armstrong, director of exchange-traded markets at TFS Energy Futures, a Stamford, Conn., broker. “Traders don’t want rules that are going to change the game.”

The interventionism represents a significant shift for both the CFTC and the U.K. government, both of which have previously taken a more free-market approach and stopped short of calling for action on speculators. “Where there has been unfair speculation or abuse of the market then we would be prepared to act,” Mr. Brown said in a briefing with journalists.

Mr. Brown and his French counterpart called on the International Organization of Securities Regulators to look at improving transparency and the supervision of oil-futures markets. An umbrella organization for global securities regulators, IOSCO helps to set international standards and advises national bodies on regulation. In March, it set out guidelines on how regulators can beef up their supervision and enforcement of commodities.

The French and British leaders hope to get backing for their drive at the summit of the Group of Eight leading industrial countries that begins in Italy on Wednesday.

Politicians around the world are worried about the effect of rising oil prices on the recovery potential of their recession-hit economies. In recent weeks, companies in various industries have complained that the rise in oil prices has, or will, hurt their profits.

Can anyone define “speculators” for me? Can anyone tell me what the price of oil “should” be based on fundamentals? Can anyone tell me what variables go into that fundamental analysis?

I ask because I have no idea. Why?

The price of oil takes into account (among others):

  • Current supply/demand
  • Expected future supply/demand
  • Geo-political considerations (will Israel attack Iran, will Chavez nationalize every oil co. etc)
  • China’s future needs

Now, in order to be able to say “this is the what the fundamental price should be” means that we can answer those questions with a high degree of accuracy. If we are off, for example on what the future demand will be based on US consumption in November, than the current price of oil is either too low or too high.

Since we know the quality of economic predictions decreases as the time from their date increases, how can we really with any type of intellectual honesty say “demand will be x” in November or early next year?

If I think it is going to be 10% higher than today an I buy the ETF USO to have exposure to oil, does that make me a “oil speculator” or an “investor” because I view the current price as too low based on my expected future fundamentals?

The problems the abound. First we have what seems to be a discernible trend to demonizing a group of people because we do not like the outcome and because it helps the government take action. Second, there is the arrogant opinion that the government can fix all ills and dictate the actions of the market. Third, this will fail because when investors are not able with confidence to understand the rules under which they invest, markets breakdown.

We saw proof of this last year with the short selling ban. Investor confidence fled and while there was no short selling, there were also no buyers due to this lack of confidence. What happened next that as prices fell, the selling of shareholders increased and the lack of buyers caused markets to crater.

What will happen to this current proposed rule? Well, the easy thing would be for the UNG/USO ETF’s to simply split. Place 1/2 of assets in a separate entity, tied to the same commodity and then rule averted because no one entity would control too much of the futures market. Has anything fundamentally changed? Nope

The only thing different would be yet another reason for investors to fear the market and what government may decide to do to it on any given day….that is the worst thing of all .


Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long UNG, none

Categories
Articles

Wall St. Media 7/8

Talking with Doug (@wsmco) about Natural Gas (UNG), News Corp. (NWS) and Borders (BGP).

See more great investing video at Wall St. Media


Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long all securities listed above…

Categories
Articles

Wall St. Media 7/8

Talking with Doug (@wsmco) about Natural Gas (UNG), News Corp. (NWS) and Borders (BGP).

See more great investing video at Wall St. Media


Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long all securities listed above…

Categories
Articles

Housing….Not Near The End

Whitney Tilson of T2 Partners has done the most extensive public work yet on the housing crisis. Even better than that, the conclusions he came to over a years ago were 100% accurate.

For those who do not wish to read the whole presentation (I suggest you do), here is the most applicable slides (click to enlarge):

Simple explanation is that we are about 1/2 way through this.

We have spoken about housing here before and nothing here changes our outlook, a recovery is a year or more away. Now, by recovery I mean stabilization in prices and sales, NOT a return to prior levels. That type of recovery will take the better part of the next decade.

Whole Presentation:
The Housing Crisis: By T2 Partners


Disclosure (“none” means no position):

Categories
Articles

Wednesday's Links

Tylenol, Savings, Recession, Rosenberg

Caution

– We keep hearing about a “savings glut”. This paper addresses it. It is long but well worth it

– Over?? Not too sure about that

– He has been all of this…




Disclosure (“none” means no position):

Categories
Articles

Wednesday’s Links

Tylenol, Savings, Recession, Rosenberg

Caution

– We keep hearing about a “savings glut”. This paper addresses it. It is long but well worth it

– Over?? Not too sure about that

– He has been all of this…




Disclosure (“none” means no position):

Categories
Articles

Brick & Mortar Books Dead?

Saw this and thoughts it was very interesting given the talk out there of the “demise” of brick and mortar book retailers especially as it related to both Barnes and Noble (BKS) and Borders (BGP).

From Media Bistro

After just one week in the Apple App Store, the brand-new Barnes & Noble iPhone app has grabbed the number one slot on the “Top Free Apps” list in App Store’s “Books” category–unseating two Amazon digital reader applications from the top spots.

With the new Barnes & Noble app, readers can shop, read reviews, and explore web-only extras via smartphone. While these rankings are constantly shifting, the new app has overtaken both the Amazon Kindle (AMZN) for iPhone (AAPL) and Amazon-owned Stanza e-reader in popularity–perhaps a good omen for Barnes & Noble’s future in the smartphone market.

Here’s the most geeky and interesting feature on the bookselling app, from the release: “Barnes & Noble has partnered with LinkMe Mobile from Evryx Technologies, Inc. and Spotlight Mobile, Inc. so that users can simply snap a photo to search millions of products. Using the iPhone or iPod touch camera, just snap a photo of the front cover and within seconds get product details, editorial reviews, and customer ratings–even find and reserve a copy in the store closest to you.”

To me this is a tell that there will always be something “tactile” as my friend @wood83 says when it comes to both books and the sales process for them. The Barnes & Noble reader has the advantage of tying the online/store shopping experience together (shame on Borders for not having this done yet). Now this is not a negative for either Apple or Amazon but a huge plus for Barnes. Successfully tying in the web with the store at all levels give them a unique model that is effectively unmatched.

We seem to be in a series of “death of” loops now. Everyday I turn on something electronic I am hearing about the “death of buy and hold”, the “death of value investing”, the “death of (place item here)”. Ignore them all.

Is the book business changing, perhaps forever? Yup. Is the experience of going to a bookstore going away? No.


Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long BGP, none

Categories
Articles

BMW Sales Decline Slows

Watch the video. This goes directly to the strategy at AutoNation (AN). The luxury auto market was dragged into the recession and will lead the auto market out. The length of time sales spend in it will be dwarfed by domestic and non-premium imports.

Just yesterday we talked about AutoNation’s Mercedes push. When I first spoke with CEO Mike Jackson last year, before credit market imploded he was stressing his desire to move the company away from domestic and into imports with a special emphasis on premium brands.

He stated then that the premium market, while not immune, was less markedly less affect by the business cycle, offered better margins and had longer service revenues
as those drivers tended to place a priority on keeping those vehicles running at a higher level. Currently AutoNation has 10% of Mercedes and 4.5%-5% of BMW US markets.

In June most domestic foreign makers saw sales fall 20% to 30%. Ford (F) was the lone bright spot with an 11% decline. But again, this is against already eviscerated sales as a starting point.

Now the usual disclaimer comes into play here. It is only a months worth of data and we need to see more for it to then become a trend. BUT, after what has happened to the auto market the last 8 months, good news of any sort is very welcome indeed.


Disclosure (“none” means no position):

Categories
Articles

Boone…..

Whether you agree with Boone or not, you have to give the guy credit, he puts his money where his mouth is. Because of that, anything he says ought to be given a closer look. He is 100% right on natural gas. We have century’s worth of it in the ground. Why we are not laser focused on getting it is mystifying.

“The Pickens Plan”- Update:

Natural Gas:

Energy Independence:


Disclosure (“none” means no position):

Categories
Articles

Tuesday's Links

News Corp, Health insurance, California, Unemployment

– Murdoch is ahead of everyone else in media charging for content…and because he has great content, he is getting his money for it

– This is an intentionally unreported truth. Most of those without health insurance CAN afford but CHOOSE to go without. The number one offenders are the self employed contractors. I know roughly a dozen folks w/o any type of health insurance, EVERY one could afford it should they CHOOSE to pay for it. When you hear the “millions of people w/o insurance”, the number that leads us to believe they cannot afford it is a LIE.

– State is Bankrupt…yet they are dipping into a “special fund” to pay for a pedophile multi millionaire’s funeral…. I despise this state…it is the poster child for everything wrong with gov’t


– Could happen




Disclosure (“none” means no position):

Categories
Articles

Tuesday’s Links

News Corp, Health insurance, California, Unemployment

– Murdoch is ahead of everyone else in media charging for content…and because he has great content, he is getting his money for it

– This is an intentionally unreported truth. Most of those without health insurance CAN afford but CHOOSE to go without. The number one offenders are the self employed contractors. I know roughly a dozen folks w/o any type of health insurance, EVERY one could afford it should they CHOOSE to pay for it. When you hear the “millions of people w/o insurance”, the number that leads us to believe they cannot afford it is a LIE.

– State is Bankrupt…yet they are dipping into a “special fund” to pay for a pedophile multi millionaire’s funeral…. I despise this state…it is the poster child for everything wrong with gov’t


– Could happen




Disclosure (“none” means no position):