Categories
Articles

"Davidson" Says: PG Is A Buy!!

“Davidson” is back with a breakdown of Proctor & Gamble (PG)

Wall St. Newsletters

He writes:
I calculated the ROE/Multiple of BV for PG from 2000 till the lastest Morningstar report. Gillette was bought in 2006 and it was a transition year which did not have simple year end values.

For the time period the Current Market Rate of Return has been between 5-6%. Currently the value is 5.4% and for a return that makes a LgCap equity attractive the average is 150% x CMRR = 8.1%

With PG about $52shr this makes it buyable for the 1st time in the last 10yrs. I have looked at the margins and have been very impressed with the debt pay down from 80% Debt/Equity in 2005 to 32% today, this company has very a conservative financial position and appear to have seen our current environment coming. Their business has been steady even during the last slow down 2001-2003. Business is international with a manageable commodity input cost.

He provides the following information:

Disclosure (“none” means no position):None

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Berkshire Now Just Might Be A Buy??

After a a year of saying Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) was no value, I’m thinking it just may be getting there.

Wall St. Newsletters

In July 2008 I said:

Wholly-owned subs such as Shaw Industries, Clayton Homes, Jordan’s Furniture (the are 4 furniture companies), Benjamin Moore, Home Services and Acme Brick and directly tied to housing and will suffer in the downturn.

For all its holdings, Berkshire is essentially an insurance company. It has operated under “perfect” conditions for the last two years according to Buffett and eventually to run must end. Premiums are already falling and as houses are re-poed and fewer new cars are purchase, insurance premiums derived from those products will fall accordingly. I know people who are looking at homeowners and auto policies for way to decrease coverage and save money. Whether or not this is a good idea is irrelevant (I do not think it is), it is happening. Throw in a hurricane or two (we are due) and insurance could suffer quite a poor year.

For more on Berkshire’s insurance read this former post:

Back in March when shares sat at $133,000 I argued they were not a “value”. Today they sit at $111,000. Are they a value now? Perhaps but one also has to expect that the near term, if Tilson is correct is fraught with potholes for Berkshire and earnings ought to take a hit.

Based on that, share price ought to suffer also meaning you will probably be able to pick them up cheaper down the road. If I owned shares would I sell? If I needed the money in the next year, yes. If I had a multi-year time frame would I sell? No. If that was the case I would be watching down the road for a cheaper entry price, I think you’ll get it.

What has happened since then?

From Barrons:

Berkshire agreed to purchase $150 million of 10 1/8% notes due in 2015 and $250 million of 10 3/8% notes due in 2018 from Birmingham, Ala.-based Vulcan. The note sale was reported in late January, but Vulcan didn’t identify the buyer of the notes until Tuesday’s earnings conference call.

Other recent Berkshire bond purchases include $300 million of Harley Davidson Inc. (HOG) 15% notes due in 2014 and $150 million of Sealed Air 12% notes due in 2014.

These purchases follow big transactions in the fourth quarter, when Berkshire purchased $5 billion of 10% preferred stock from Goldman Sachs (GS) and $3 billion of 10% preferred from General Electric (GE). Both those deals came with a sizable amount of equity warrants. During October, Berkshire also bought $4.4 billion of 11.45% subordinated notes and $2.1 billion of 5% preferred stock issued by Wrigley, which was purchased by Mars in a leveraged buyout.

One deal that Buffett probably regrets is his agreement to purchase $3 billion of convertible preferred stock in Dow Chemical Co. (DOW) if it goes forward with its deal to buy chemical maker Rohm & Haas Co. (ROH) for $15 billion. Berkshire’s purchase is contingent on the consummation of the deal.

Buffett may be hoping that the deal dies, or that Dow comes back to Berkshire with more generous terms to get a larger investment from Berkshire if Dow goes forward with the deal. Dow is resisting completion of the transaction, arguing that the debt that it would have to take on would be ruinous financially. As it stands, the Dow convertible preferred that Berkshire agreed to purchase will carry an 8.5% interest rate and a conversion price around $40, way above Dow’s current share price of $10.

If we do some simple math, Bekshire has put roughly $17.9 billion to work at 10%. That will provide Berkshire $1.7 billion a year for the next three years (some of it may convert to equity at that point). When one considers Berkshire has earned $7.8 billion of the last 12 months (Q4 2008 numbers not released yet), Buffett’s recent moved will add 21% to those earnings.

Now, insurance. Yes as stated above, the party is over but, rates are scheduled for increases. As insurance companies look to cover losses in investment portfolio’s, the aggressive pricing that has taken place in the past few years will abate, causing industry rates to rise. Also, one should expect those insurance companies feeling the pinch to take fewer larger risks. Since this is an area Berkshire loves to play in, fewer players will mean stronger pricing power on the part of Berkshire.

We will not a resurgence to the “glory years” in insurance, but conditions for the first time in a few years will improve. Remember, Berkshire is essentially an insurance company, since that business seems to have stabilized, being the best of that lot, we must assume Berkhsire has.

Berkshire’s investment portfolio has been hurt this year by the weak showing of some of its major equity investments, Wells Fargo (WFC), U.S. Bancorp (USB), Kraft (KFT), Coca-Cola (K) and Procter & Gamble (PG). While prices here are depressed, there is no permanent impairment to earnings and that is a point being missed by folks. To believe these companies will be at depressed prices 3 years from now means the global economy will not recover. If you believe that, buying any equity is a waste of time.

Berkshire is big holder of those three companies’ shares and it also is short $37 billion of long-dated put options on the S&P 500 and other equity indexes. As the market has dropped, Berkshire has taken a charge to earnings (no cash) in the write-down of the value of these options. When the market rises, the opposite will happen (write-up). Again, to assume no improvement here implies US business is stagnant for the next decade.

Now, Berkshire is down roughly 33% since my fist post on it. The difference now is that several of its businesses are showing signs of life and Buffett has put billions to work at 10% vs the pittance is was getting previously in Treasuries.

The next piece of the puzzle is the Berkshire manufacturing businesses listed above. They will turn when the economy does. If you believe that is the 2nd half of this year, the time to buy is now. If you believe that is 2010, you have time to wait.

Will Berkshire go lower? I do not know but I do know that there isn’t a good reason for it to go much lower barring further dramatic worldwide economic collapse.

Time will tell but I think Berkhsire at its current levels do not have much more downside….

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long WFC, none

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Thursday’s Links…Obama "Unplugged"

Barack Obama unplugged…..

Wall St. Newsletters

Regarding fries

– Regarding “white folk”

– Regarding the Presidency

– Regarding some guy
Disclosure (“none” means no position):

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

RealMoney Column Posted

I have started contributing to Realmoney.com and TheStreet.com and my first column has been posted

Wall St. Newsletters

For those with a subscription, you can read it here

Disclosure (“none” means no position):

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Berkshire Files 13D in Goldman Sachs $$

Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) and Buffett hold 8.6% of the common in Goldman Sachs (GS)

Wall St. Newsletters

“Explanatory Note: The Reporting Persons had intended to file this Schedule 13G pursuant to Rule 13d-1(b), pursuant to which it would have been timely filed on February 17, 2009. In the course of preparing this Schedule 13G, the Reporting Persons determined that BH Finance, LLC, which is not an entity specified in §240.13d-1(b)(1)(ii)(A) through (J), owns slightly more than 1% of the Issuer’s outstanding common stock, making the Reporting Persons ineligible for Rule 13d-1(b). All shares of Common Stock of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported in this Schedule 13G are held in the form of warrants exercisable by the Reporting Persons within 60 days.”

Full filing

Disclosure (“none” means no position):None

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Berkshire Hathaway Files 13D/A in USG $$

Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) now has 34% of USG (USG)

Wall St. Newsletters

From the filing
BH Nebraska is the holder of $160 million aggregate principal amount of the Notes (the “BH Nebraska Notes”), which, to the knowledge of the Reporting Persons, if converted, would constitute approximately 11.2% of USG’s outstanding Common Stock, based on the number of shares of Common Stock disclosed as outstanding on the Issuer’s Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on October 28, 2008. BH Assurance is the holder of $90 million aggregate principal amount of the Notes, which, to the knowledge of the Reporting Persons, if converted, would constitute approximately 6.3% of USG’s outstanding Common Stock (the “BH Assurance Notes,” and together with the BH Nebraska Notes, the “Nebraska/Assurance Notes”), based on the number of shares of Common Stock disclosed as outstanding on the Issuer’s Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on October 28, 2008. General Re Life is the holder of $50 million aggregate principal amount of the Notes, which, to the knowledge of the Reporting Persons, if converted, would constitute approximately 3.5% of USG’s outstanding Common Stock (the “General Re Life Notes”), based on the number of shares of Common Stock disclosed as outstanding on the Issuer’s Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on October 28, 2008. Mr. Buffett may be deemed to control Berkshire, which controls BH Nebraska, BH Assurance and General Re Life. Thus, both Mr. Buffett and Berkshire may be considered to have beneficial ownership of the Nebraska/Assurance Notes and the Gen Re Life Notes. NICO, an indirect subsidiary of Berkshire and the direct parent company of BH Nebraska and BH Assurance, also may be considered to have beneficial ownership of the Nebraska/Assurance Notes. OBH, a direct subsidiary of Berkshire and the direct parent company of NICO, also may be considered to have beneficial ownership of the Nebraska/Assurance Notes. Cologne Re, an indirect subsidiary of Berkshire and the direct parent company of General Re Life, also may be considered to have beneficial ownership of the General Re Life Notes. General Reinsurance, an indirect subsidiary of Berkshire and the direct parent company of Cologne Re, also may be considered to have beneficial ownership of the General Re Life Notes. General Re, a direct subsidiary of Berkshire and the direct parent company of General Reinsurance, also may be considered to have beneficial ownership of the General Re Life Notes.

(b) BH Nebraska has voting and investment power with respect to the BH Nebraska Notes. BH Assurance has voting and investment power with respect to the BH Assurance Notes. However, Mr. Buffett, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Berkshire, who may be deemed to control BH Nebraska and BH Assurance, directs the investment of BH Nebraska and BH Assurance. Thus, Mr. Buffett, Berkshire, NICO and OBH share voting and investment power with respect to the Nebraska/Assurance Notes. General Re Life has voting and investment power with respect to the General Re Life Notes. However, Mr. Buffett, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Berkshire, who may be deemed to control General Re Life, directs the investment of General Re Life. Thus, Mr. Buffett, Berkshire, Cologne Re, General Reinsurance and General Re share voting and investment power with respect to the General Re Life Notes.

Item 6 is hereby amended to add the following:
On November 21, 2008, Berkshire and USG entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”), pursuant to which, and subject to the terms and conditions thereof, Berkshire agreed to purchase Notes in an aggregate principal amount of $300 million, and USG agreed to sell Notes in an aggregate principal amount of $300 million dollars, for an aggregate purchase price of $300 million. On November 26, 2008, BH Nebraska purchased $160 million aggregate principal amount of the Notes, BH Assurance purchased $90 million aggregate principal amount of the Notes, and General Re Life purchased $50 million aggregate principal amount of the

Notes.
Following stockholder approval of the issuance of shares of Common Stock upon conversion of the Notes at a special meeting of the USG stockholders held on February 9, 2009, the Notes became convertible into Common Stock at the option of BH Nebraska, BH Assurance and General Re Life at any time prior to the close of business on the business day immediately preceding the final maturity date of the Notes (December 1, 2018), unless the Notes are earlier repurchased or redeemed by USG, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the indenture and the supplemental indenture governing the Notes (the “Indenture”). The Notes are convertible into Common Stock at an initial conversion price of $11.40 per share, subject to adjustments as set forth in the Indenture.

On November 26, 2008, Berkshire and USG entered into an Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement (“Registration Rights Agreement”), pursuant to which USG has granted BH Nebraska, BH Assurance and General Re Life certain registration rights with respect to its shares of Common Stock and the Notes. The Registration Rights Agreement amended and restated in its entirety that certain Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of January 30, 2006, between USG and Berkshire.
The preceding discussion of the Securities Purchase Agreement, Assignment and Assumption Agreement, Indenture and Registration Rights Agreement does not contain a complete description of such agreements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such agreements, which are filed as exhibits hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

Here are the details of the convertible transaction
Disclosure (“none” means no position):None

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Thoughts on Knowledge and Opportunity (Stocktwits) $$

The internet is enabling us as investors unprecedented access to other investors and has created unbelievable opportunities….if you’ll do some work and accept the knowledge they offer.

Wall St. Newsletters

Here is a little story:

A priest offered a Nun a lift.
She got in and crossed her legs, forcing her gown to reveal a leg.
The priest nearly had an accident.
After controlling the car, he stealthily slid his hand up her leg.
The nun said, ‘Fathe r, remember Psalm 129?’
The priest removed his hand. But, changing gears, he let his hand slide up her leg again. The nun once again said, ‘Father, remember Psalm 129?’
The priest apologized ‘Sorry sister but the flesh is weak.’
Arriving at the convent, the nun sighed heavily and went on her way.
Upon his arrival at the church, the priest rushed to look up Psalm 129. It said, ‘Go forth and seek, further up, you will find glory.’

Moral of the story:
If you are not well informed in your job, you might miss a great opportunity.

The same goes for investing. Do yourself a favor. Follow the those on StockTwits for a day or so. There is a mix of traders and investors there. The beauty of it is that it is a stream of conscious thought and a back and forth (respectful, unlike message boards).

You can follow the whole community, the traders, the investors or just a symbol in a portfolio. Essentially it enables you to make it what you want it to be. There is one thing you will notice if you follow it. Those who are successful, work at it. They are not blindly buying and selling. The action is thought out and has a definite rhyme and reason to it.  The conversation and sharing both starts well before the market does and continues after it closes.

At the end of the day,  they are going through data to find new ideas. They are constantly testing their thesis, sharing ideas and considering feedback from the community. Everyone who invests occasionally hits a spell of blind luck (good or bad), at times we make or lose money due to events that were unpredicatable. But, those who are successful over the long term are so because they work at it.

As investors we benefit today because social networking allows us to both gleem their knowledge and share our ideas with them. If you follow the right ones, their generosity in giving feedback is invaluable.  If you are shy, the medium allow you to sit back and just listen and learn, nothing wrong with that.

Learn from those who are successful…don’t be like the priest and miss an opportunity..

Disclosure (“none” means no position):None

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

A Message for the Bank Execs Today…

Here is a sweet little story that I things bank executives in front of Congress today ought to take to heart.

Wall St. Newsletters

A little bird was flying south for the winter. It was so cold the bird froze and fell to the ground into a large field.
While he was lying there, a cow came by and dropped some dung on him.
As the frozen bird lay there in the pile of cow dung, he began to realize how warm he was.
The dung was actually thawing him out!
He lay there all warm and happy, and soon began to sing for joy.
A passing cat heard the bird singing and came to investigate.
Following the sound, the cat discovered the bird under the pile of cow dung, and promptly dug him out and ate him.

Moral of the story:
(1) Not everyone who shits on you is your enemy.

(2) Not everyone who gets you out of shit is your friend.

(3) And when you’re in deep shit, it’s best to keep your mouth shut!

Disclosure (“none” means no position):

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Alan Blinder: "Origins of The Financial Mess"

From Nov. 2008

Wall St. Newsletters

Disclosure (“none” means no position):

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Shiller on Behavioral Finance

Given current events, rather appropriate…no?

Wall St. Newsletters

Disclosure (“none” means no position):

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Wednesday’s Links- 2 Vids, A Lesson, Black Gold

Greed, Wall St. Media, Learning, DXO

Wall St. Newsletters

– Gekko had it rights, only greed will fix this problem

– Thank for the mention

– “Learning from Losses” a great piece

– A way to play it

Disclosure (“none” means no position):

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Government Spending vs Unemployment: The Relationship

This ought to illicit some conversation….

Wall St. Newsletters

Here is the link to Westbury’s original piece:
Unemployment and Stimulus II

Publish at Scribd or explore others: Academic Work brian westbury first trust

Disclosure (“none” means no position):

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Wilbur Ross Eyes Another Florida Bank

Ross has been talking about buying banks for a while. After his recent purchase, he is back in the Florida market

Wall St. Newsletters

Billionaire investor Wilbur Ross and the Carlyle private equity group are considering a joint bid for BankUnited Financial Corp (BKUNA.O), the Financial Times said, citing people familiar with the matter.

The two investors were conducting due diligence as Tim Geithner, U.S. Treasury secretary, prepared a financial sector rescue plan that would seek to induce private capital to pursue deals for distressed financial institutions and assets, the newspaper said.

Bank deals could have a growing appeal for private equity groups, which are facing big obstacles in securing the financing they need to make big leveraged buyouts, the paper said. Florida-based BankUnited Financial is a troubled bank with $14 billion in assets, the newspaper said.

Carlyle has been among the more cautious private equity investors in making investments in financial companies, the FT said. By contrast, Ross said he is looking at more than 100 banks after buying several mortgage servicing operations, the newspaper added.

Disclosure (“none” means no position):None

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

More Thoughts on the AutoDealer Decimation

Folks keep asking me about US auto dealers and how much the market is shrinking. Some numbers..

Wall St. Newsletters

From USA Today:

Auto sales last year were a paltry 13.2 million, the worst since 1992 and down 18% from 2007. This year, forecasts are 10 million to 10.5 million. The reality: Too many dealers; too few sales.

“The whole goal is to be here a year from now,” says Mike Jackson, CEO of AutoNation, (AN) the country’s largest dealer chain.

The industry will see a net loss of 900 new car dealers this year, the biggest thinning of the ranks in nearly three decades, predicts the National Automobile Dealers Association. That’s on top of a net loss of 760 dealers last year.

The numbers alone “don’t describe the pain,” said the NADA’s immediate past president, Annette Sykora, who has Ford and Chrysler dealerships in the small West Texas towns of Slaton and Levelland. Speaking to dealers at the group’s convention in New Orleans last month, she added, “Some dealers mortgaged their own homes to try to stay in business and still had to close.”

Counting all brands, foreign and domestic, there are about 20,000 new car dealerships in the USA. Consultant Grant Thornton recently estimated the optimal number at about 16,000. At that level, dealers on average should be able to sell as many cars this year as they did 10 years ago — about 750 each.

GM, Ford and Chrysler dealers will bear the brunt of the closings because of the Detroit 3’s market share losses. From a high of 8 out of 10 new cars sold in 1984, their market share today hovers around 50%. Weak dealers aren’t profitable, aren’t able to keep their facilities as clean and modern as competitors’ and generally hurt the image of the brands they sell.

State franchise laws generally make it difficult and expensive for an automaker to close or buy out a dealer. So automakers have been letting the recession do the dirty work.

What are the dealer losses looking like?

•General Motors. GM had 6,375 dealers at the start of 2009, down 401 in a year. The goal: 4,700 by the end of 2012. As one of the conditions for its loan, GM promised the government it would drastically slim its business. Hummer and Saab brands are for sale. Saturn could go, too, and Pontiac is to shrink. GM may decide what to do with them this month, said Mark LaNeve, a GM vice president.

•Chrysler. The weakest of the Detroit 3 managed to shed 287 dealers last year to leave it with 3,287 at the start of 2009. It was using a program called Project Genesis, aimed at eliminating overlapping vehicles in Chrysler’s lineup and pressuring Chrysler, Dodge and Jeep dealers to consolidate the brands under one roof. This year the program was iced because Chrysler had a bigger need: survival.

•Ford Motor. Ford continues to reduce dealers in metro areas but doesn’t have to be as aggressive about it because it didn’t accept a government loan. If it had, Ford would have to stick with a formal plan to show that it will become viable, which could include slashing the dealer count. Ford started the year with 3,787 dealers, down 269. CEO Alan Mulally is pinning his hopes on a second-half rally. Ford just tapped its remaining credit line from private sources. If that’s not enough, it will have to turn to the government.

•Foreign brands. Most import brands have proportionally fewer dealers and aren’t in the same shape as Detroit. Toyota (TM), for instance, has about 1,400 dealers, fewer than half as many as Chrysler or Ford, but it outsold both of those automakers last year. On average, a Ford Motor dealer sold roughly 500 vehicles last year, while each of Toyota’s averaged more than 1,600.

For a while now I have been saying what is happening in the economy while painful now for shareholders of AutoNation, is setting the company up for dramatic gains down the road. Domestic brands currently make up less that 30% of AutoNation’s sales and Jackson has stated his desire to move that to 20%. The business model at AutoNation has them owning the property their dealerships are on. That simply means they can convert a Ford (F) or GM (GM) dealership to a Toyota (TM) or Honda (HMC) easily without any landlord or property owner considerations.

It also means that Jackson is easily able to alter his product mix to capture trends in the markets place. While AutoNation may be part of the national reduction in GM dealerships for example, that dealership is not sitting idle, it is being converted to a more useful and profitable purpose (different brand). Here is a “did you know”, AutoNation sells 10% of the Mercedes Benz sold in the US (I do not have specifics but I believe their BMW percentage approaches 15%). This is the reason despite “depression conditions” in the auto industry currently, Jackson’s company is both cash flow positive and profitable.

When I aksed Mr. Jackson last summer if he would attmept to grow his market share through picking up cheap distressed properties or simply let is grow through attrition, his reply was instant….”through attrition”.

The above numbers are showing that those gains are going to be substantial to say the least.

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long AN, none

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

"Davidson" on Blankfein vs Westbury

Wall St. Newsletters

Seeing the Blankfein piece in the FT against Mark-to-Market vs. Wesbury is the dichotomy of the market place. Those who believe in Efficient Market Hypothesis believe that price trend represent all the information available for a particular security. Mark-to-Market is valid in all environments for traders, technical and momentum investors. Efficient Market players have investment horizons from minutes to months. If they hold longer than a year, it is only due to a series of short term technical signals that reinforced holding.

The “Value Investors” on the other hand look for mispricing vs. fundamentals, i.e. discount to Book Value, Cash Flow or some other value parameter that is measurable and quantifiable. Warren Buffett is the prime example of Value Investing, the best known, but there are numerous others. However, the number of true “Value Investors” is far less than all other investors. Value investors investigate, analyze and parse a target company’s business till they are comfortable with the decision to commit funds at a level at which they feel an anticipated rate of return is likely to be had over a multi year period. It is not unknown for Value investors to hire investigators and analysts to look at each business site of a company’s operation, individual tax filings, competitors and vendor information in an effort to sleuth the locations of all values within a company. Value investors have an investment horizon that is typically greater than 5yrs.

Mark-to-Market accounting during down markets provides opportunities for Value investors. Their records are well known. There are no traders famous for their investment judgment over the same period of any well known value player.

Importantly, mixing Value investors and Efficient Market players (calling them investors is an abomination of the word) in the same room is like watching two vastly different cultures trying to communicate. They can’t. They are so culturally different that the terms, “value”, “return”, “analysis” which stand for defining action and criteria for one have no equal meaning in the other. What is even more bazaar is that in most instances they do not understand why they don’t understand each other as they each believe they are perfectly correct in their views of assessing investment opportunities.

I am a Value investor. There are truly very few of us vs. other investors. My guess is less than 2%.

Mark-to-Market accounting is an abomination of reasoning during periods of market disruption such as we just experienced when the SEC banned short selling. Unfortunately, there are more of them than us, but fortunately the market will and is currently righting itself even with the mistakes we have made and continue to make. Philosophically we need the majority of investors to not get it right so that us few can take advantage of the deep discounts not produced in any other way.

All will be well even if the current stimulus package is passed. It may just take longer.

Disclosure (“none” means no position):

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books