Barron’s talks about Ackman’s purchases of General Growth (GGP) and Gates’s of Otter Tail (OTTR)
Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long GGP, none
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books
Barron’s talks about Ackman’s purchases of General Growth (GGP) and Gates’s of Otter Tail (OTTR)
Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long GGP, none
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books
This is truly great stuff. The report covers reflation, oil and stimulus.
The portion you need to read is on page 4 titled “Oil Prices: Another Spike Ahead”
Authors Rubin and Buchanan lay out how while demand has fallen, the cost of new oil finds has not. What that means in its simplest terms is that much of current production shuttered, will not return until prices rise near $100 again. Any resumption of demand then all but guarantees rapid price increases. Please read this..
Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long Oil
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books
This is a must read…
Disclosure (“none” means no position):
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books
As I look at the universe of stock I watch, one thing keeps coming to mind, who’s business does not rely on consumer or corporate credit?
Today GE (GE) reported:
Fourth-quarter 2008 earnings from continuing operations of $3.9 billion, or $.37 per share before preferred dividend, or $.36 per share attributable to common shareowners. Results included $1.5 billion of after-tax restructuring and other charges, including increased reserves in current environment, which are above the Company’s original plan and the restructuring will lower costs for 2009 and beyond.
For the year, revenue was $183 billion, up 6%, and earnings were $18.1 billion, down 19%. This was the third highest earnings year in GE history.
“In a very tough environment, we delivered fourth quarter business results in line with expectations we provided in December,” Chairman and CEO Jeff Immelt said. “We grew Infrastructure and Media by 3% in the quarter and 10% for the year. Energy Infrastructure led the way in the quarter with 11% segment profit growth driven by continued global demand. Technology Infrastructure grew earnings by 1%, led by 21% growth in Aviation. NBC Universal segment profits declined 6% in fourth quarter as strong cable earnings were offset by declines in the local stations.
“Capital Finance earned $1 billion in the quarter and $8.6 billion for the year,” Immelt said. “We had several negative impacts to earnings in the quarter including increased loss reserves, negative marks and impairments. These charges, along with global benefits, generated a tax credit that more than offset our pre-tax loss. We also originated $48 billion of new assets in the quarter at solid margins.
“We run the company to have a Triple-A credit rating, and we have significantly strengthened our liquidity position,” Immelt said. “We generated $16.7 billion of industrial cash flow from operations, up 5%. We ended the year with $48 billion in total cash, after paying down our commercial paper balance to $72 billion from $88 billion at the third quarter. We used $5.5 billion of our equity offering to meet our stated GE Capital debt-to-equity leverage goal of 7:1 by the end of 2008. Through today, we have been able to fund $29 billion of our $45 billion long-term debt needs for 2009.
Also, Harley Davidson (HOG) reported:
Decreased revenue, net income and earnings per share for the fourth quarter of 2008 compared to the year-ago quarter. The Company said it plans lower motorcycle shipments in 2009 and made public its overall strategy to deal with the current economic environment.
“We have a strong core business anchored by a uniquely powerful brand, but we are certainly not immune to the current economic conditions,” said Jim Ziemer, Chief Executive Officer, Harley-Davidson Inc. “We have a clear strategy to not only deal with the economic conditions, but also strengthen our long-term operations and financial results. We are executing that strategy with confidence and conviction.”
Fourth-Quarter and Full-Year Results
Revenue for the quarter was $1.29 billion compared to $1.39 billion in the year-ago quarter, a 6.8 percent decrease. Net income for the quarter was $77.8 million compared to $186.1 million in the fourth quarter 2007, a decrease of 58.2 percent. Fourth quarter diluted earnings per share were $0.34, a 56.4 percent decrease compared to last year’s $0.78.
Revenue for the full year 2008 was $5.59 billion compared to $5.73 billion in 2007, a 2.3 percent decline. Full-year net income was $654.7 million, compared to $933.8 million in 2007. Diluted earnings per share were $2.79, a decrease of 25.4 percent compared to $3.74 in 2007. The full-year results are below the previously provided company guidance.
For the full year, wholesale shipments of Harley-Davidson® motorcycles were 303,479 units, an 8.2 percent decrease compared to 330,619 units in 2007.
2009 Shipment Plan, Gross Margins
In the first quarter of 2009, the Company plans to ship between 74,000 and 78,000 new Harley-Davidson motorcycles, a 3.0 percent to 8.5 percent increase versus the first quarter of 2008. However, for the full year 2009, the Company plans to ship between 264,000 and 273,000 new Harley-Davidson motorcycles, a 10 percent to 13 percent reduction from 2008.
“We reduced our production levels prudently in 2008, helping our dealers achieve lower inventory levels,” said Ziemer, “and we’re going to show similar discipline in 2009. That’s not only critical for the health of our business, but for our dealers’ businesses, as well.”
For the full year 2009, the Company expects gross margins to be between 30.5 percent and 31.5 percent, which compares to 34.5 percent for the full year 2008. The decrease is primarily due to an expected unfavorable shipment mix versus 2008, the allocation of fixed costs over fewer units, and expected unfavorable foreign currency exchange rates versus 2008. Given the volatility of the current economic environment, the Company also indicated it would not provide EPS guidance for 2009.
Strategy for the Current Economic Environment
The Company is executing a three-part strategy that includes a number of measures to deal with the impact of the recession and worldwide slowdown in consumer demand, with the intent of strengthening its operations and financial results going forward.
“Our strategy is focused on three critical areas: to invest in the Harley-Davidson brand, get our cost-structure right, and obtain funding for HDFS to help our dealers sell motorcycles and our retail customers to buy them,” said Ziemer.
They both run the gamut of customers, GE more corporate and HOG pure consumer. Both are great companies and both are struggling while still profitable. Long term both will be just fine. BUT, this year, I think significant downside is possible. Now, that only means a fantastic buying opportunity later, not the end of the world.
One of the best traders I follow sees GE hitting $7 or $8 in Q2. Here is UpsideTraders site. Should GE be forced to cut the dividend or lose its AAA rating, this is all but assured (that and Immelt is out of a job). As much as GE says it will not, they also said full year earnings were “in the bag” when they were not. Until they fix the credibility problem, anyone saying anything from Fairfield will be look at very skeptically.
That being said, even if they cut is 50% to $.62 annual, at $8 a share that is a nice 7% yield, still a screaming buy. I just cannot commit new money there now until I get some evidence to the contrary.
HOG is the consumer, simple. The consumer is not going to be bailed out this year. So, because of that, we should not expect HOG to be. BUT, should it continue to drift into single digits, not buying it for an IRA to tuck away would be very difficult. They still are the best at making a one of a kind item and have brand loyalty like to other (until I see the Apple (AAPL) logo tattooed on folks, HOG has them beat). That being said, once credit issues are resolved, one can expect good results to follow immediately.
So then, what? Stuff in the ground, oil (USO), (DBO), (DXO), gold (GLD), (UGL) and silver (SLV). We need all three, they do not need credit for their value (one could argue tighter credit is a positive here, miners cutting back due to lack of credit decreases supply, bullish for prices), and are necessary.
Yes, as the economic recession has slowed demand for all, BUT, supply is also being taken off the market almost as fast AND demand will resume well before the current production being taken off the market can catch up. That means a spike in prices.
For all three there is also the specter of corporate and government debt and possible worldwide defaults. Mish says that there is a crisis looming and that currencies will take the fall. Gregor McDonald says that when that happens, money will flow to currencies without borders or governments, gold, silver and (maybe) oil.
Berkshire’s (BRK.A) Chairman talks about buying back his own stock for the first time.
Disclosure (“none” means no position):
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books
Obama Crash, What Matters , Energy, Oil
– Howard makes some great points
– Woodrow nails it
– Hello?!?
– Trading information on USO
Disclosure (“none” means no position):
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books
Of the approximately 80 million houses in the United States, 27 million are paid off, while the
remaining 53 million have mortgages. Of those households with mortgages, 5 million (or 9 percent)
were behind in their payments and roughly 3 percent were in foreclosure as of mid-2008.
From the Milkin Institute:
Rise and Fall of US Mortgage and Credit Markets Excerpt
Disclosure (“none” means no position):
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books
Before we get too depressed about the future, a reader reminds of where we have come from and of past difficulties.
Reader Submits:
In the chart of the US Real GDP which covers the Great Depression period 1930-1939 we had 4yrs (1930-1933) of sub-zero growth but then swung to 4yrs of strong growth (1935-1937). I believe that this history is a useful guide to the resilience of the American economy in response to highly negative financial events of our own creation.
How this correlates to the market can be seen in the chart of the Dow Jones chart below spanning 1928-1935.(The BLACK ARROW represents the inauguration of FDR)
We do fix the problems and we do recover. Those who buy in the current market and can hold till recovery will most likely do quite well even without timing the bottom.
Lower Prices = Less Risk. In my opinion this is a time to be very bullish!
Personally, I think we have another leg down. I do not see a housing rebound in 2009 at all and until that begins to straighten out, I think we meander with risk to the downside. The reader does have a good point in those calling for demise of the US are wrong, period. We have faced worse time than this (it was worse when Reagan took office, 10% unemployment, 12.5 inflation, double digit interest rates) and come through just fine.
I still say avoid financials like the plague as gov’t bailouts come with a very steep price (massive shareholder dilution) and the future for many is very cloudy at best. If they do not know how to value what they hold, how can an investor.
Those looking 10 years down the road will look back on current conditions very favorably one day.
Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long USA
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books
This is a Charlie Munger classic. For those who do not know Munger, he is essentially (for lack of a better term) Warren Buffett’s partner at Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Munger on Psychology of Human Misjudgement 1995
Disclosure (“none” means no position):
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books
Using Stops, Homework, 895 Promises, Contango
– Andy Swan has a nice post about why these are a waste
– Always check your kids homework!!!
– Track Obama’s campaign promises here
– Market Folly tells us what it is and how it effects returns
Disclosure (“none” means no position):
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books
The first half of the piece deals with Steve Jobs health and Lee is the second half..
Disclosure (“none” means no position):
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books
Let’s put the noise aside. AutoNation (AN) and CarMax (KMX), a Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) holding are picking up market share daily as smaller dealerships close by the bucket-full. When auto buying resumes (it will, they do not last forever) both will profit handsomely as buyer will have fewer option to buy from.
On CNBC
Mike Jackson CNBC 1-21-2008 from http://marccannon.vox.com/
On Bloomberg..
The following is a must see…
Jackson’s World Congress Presentation:
AutoNation’s Mike Jackson at World Congress
Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long AN
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books
When folks are flush, they will spend for status, but when things get tight and quality low cost competitors enter the market, buying habit change…fast. This also has nothing to do with Steve Jobs’ shareholder deception, what is happening now at Apple started last summer.
So, the Apple (AAPL) nuts will send me more hate mail and call me names. Oh well…
Remember when WholeFoods (WFMI) was the only place in town to get organic food and Starbucks (SBUX) was the only place the get anything other than a standard cup of coffee? Remember? It seems like and eternity ago especially when I can get organic food at the 7-11, Wal-Mart (WMT), Costco (COST), BJ’s (BJ) and every local supermarket and a cappuccino can be had at any one of a dozen local coffee houses, McDonalds (MCD) and Dunkin Donuts.
If WholeFood’s $5 a pound organic potato the best? Is Starbucks $6 cappuccino appreciably better than an offering from anyone else at a fraction of the price? No.
Is the iPhone ($199) that much better than Research in Motion’s (RIMM) Blackberry Bold or Storm that can be had for 1/2 the prices ($99 through discounts)? No
Is a Mac computer really worth 2x the amount I can get a similarly functional product from Dell (DELL) or Lenova? No.
Now for all the above, for the coffee devotee, the person searching for the “one of a kind” generic item and the computer lover who wants a top of the line item or a devoted Apple user, all of the above will continue to generates sales and profits from these folks.
But, for the “unwashed masses” (yours truly is one of them) that is not married to a brand, a cup, need a computer for basic functionality and does not need organic-hand-picked-free-trade-union-only beets, we will alway drift to the lower cost comparable item. The problem with the above three is that they lack an item for us.
The Blackberry Bold and the iPhone are both comparable items. Both have pro and cons vs each other and both have loyal followers that will tell you either is better. But for 1/2 the price, the Bold has the most important advantage over the iPhone.
I am reading Howard Lindzon’s upcoming book “The Wallstrip Edge “. For the record I am not a trader but the book is very good as it does force you to look at things a different way and it challenges “common knowledge”. Lindzon has been in the game for decades now and anytime you can get insight from someone as brutally honest as Howard, that has tremendous value. Enough about the book, I’ll have more when I publish the review next week.
As I read it I realize the trend in Apple is over like the others. Shareholders are not going to see a $180 stock price in the future and like the other two, a stable or declining price is more likely. The iPod was revolutionary and had such a lead on the others there was no answer (the real advantage was iTunes, not the player). The iPhone is a great product but was immediately matched by competitors that offer some things it doesn’t at a far lower price point. Unlike the iPod, there is no iTunes for the phone that makes using a competitor’s product impossible. Cell networks are as interchangeable as toilet paper thus the advantage the iPod has is not found on the iPhone. Now price rules.
With US sales down 24% in Q4, Apple is left with only more price cuts to stimulate sales. That will cut into margins and profits.
Are any of the above three going away? No. Are they in danger of losing money? Apple no, the others, for a while, yes. It does mean the glory days for the stock are over, unless they can tap back into the mass market that has left them. But that will require dramatic pricing alterations and all three up until this point have been painfully reluctant to do so. Starbucks and WholeFoods really have not significantly altered it and Apple only did so on the iPhone (from $599 to $399 to $199) after sales of the product ground to a pedestrian level and even at its current level, the phone is overpriced vs the market.
What’s worse is all three now have the reputation of “expensive”. That will be the hardest thing to overcome, convincing a newly thrifty bargain hunting consumer you are not what they say you are…
Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long MCD, none
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books
More Apple /Jobs / CNBC fallout, Cell Phones, CDS’s, Texas Oil
– From the NY Times
– How could you not know your phone did this?
– A great explanation of them
– What a shift might mean
Disclosure (“none” means no position):
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books
Warren Buffett loves Burlington Northern (BNI) and now has 22% of the shares.
Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) now controls 74,452,029 shares of the company after picking up over 4 million more between $61 and $62 a share 1/15.
SEC Filing
Disclosure (“none” means no position):None
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books