Categories
Articles

Time for Microsoft’s Balmer to Make Way For Ozzie?

This reader idea has real merit for Microsoft (MSFT)

Wall St. Newsletters

Reader submits:

“I have avoided MSFT for some time as too expensive. If you do the math, owner’s earnings have been 2-4% even though revenues have grown since 1997 and the stock was very flat. However, since 2006, they have been buying back stock and Net Income has risen so that 2009 is forecasted to be ~$2.20. With the stock under $20shr I began looking about for information and found that Ray Ozzie wants to remake MSFT into a start-up mode.

Ozzie looks like a man on a mission. The issue will be if Ballmer lets Ozzie have his way. Will Ballmer even be there? If I were a Board member I would be seriously concerned with Ballmer’s actions re: Yahoo. Offer $40Bill then back away with what appear to be immature negotiations.”

Just who is Ray Ozzie and what is the deal?

From Wired in November 2008

At Microsoft, he says, there must be a shift from the traditional model of software to what he calls software plus services. As slogans go, it’s not particularly catchy. But the sentiment is clear: Just packaging software, collecting the money, and then producing a new version a few years later (whether people want one or not) is no longer a sustainable business plan.

The relationship with customers must be constant and continuous. Instead of discrete onetime transactions, the money—whether from subscription fees or advertising—will flow constantly. For the user, everything will happen when it’s needed, as if pulled down from a cloud. The metaphor has been around for years, along with the more recent spinoff, cloud computing. But the phenomenon is anything but ethereal. Billions of dollars are at stake.

According to Microsoft, one example of a successful service is Windows Update, which automatically installs patches and bug fixes on users’ operating systems. Hotmail, like all Web-based mail applications, is also a service. Virtual Earth? A service. Software, but not from a box. Still, Ozzie draws the line at the idea that you can do anything and everything in the cloud, that every application can become Web-based, that the desktop is dead. Some things, he says, still require local computation, offline persistence, and the control that only one’s own desktop processor offers.

This defense of the desktop dovetails nicely with Microsoft’s historic strengths. So, while Ozzie actively evangelizes for the disruptive move to services, he’s also saying that for many purposes the ideal software model is a hybrid: a heavy-duty application (known as client software) combined with an ongoing Internet service. A great example is Apple’s iTunes, which you install on your computer and use as an offline media organizer but which also serves as an Internet app that lets you buy songs, stream music, and get recommendations.

In Ozzie’s view, Microsoft must make this model the centerpiece of all its future efforts. The company must transform itself from a manufacturer that dumps out a big product every couple of years to a customer-obsessed enterprise devoted to continually producing, updating, and supporting a full panoply of services. In his speech, Ozzie puts it this way: “When packaged software ships, services go live. What was our end is now the beginning. The gold disk”—from which all retail copies of a new piece of software are made—”is now the grand opening.”

At that point, Ozzie unveils the new products that he’s been laboring over for more than two years: a top-secret set of initiatives designed to make Microsoft as dominant in the cloud era as it was in the days of the desktop. First up is a new operating system for Web-based applications, codenamed Red Dog—it’s Windows for the cloud. (See Editor’s update below.) Then comes a demonstration of Live Mesh, which will allow people to seamlessly synchronize all their information with as many people and places as they want, across as many devices (computer, phone, camera) as they want. Finally, another engineer demonstrates how Microsoft will make even its legacy apps accessible via the cloud. It’s a shocker. After years of Microsoft insisting that the desktop is the only proper place for its crown-jewel applications—the venerable Office suite—it appears that Word, Excel, and PowerPoint will levitate from the desktop and become services as well. In this demo, an Excel spreadsheet is running in the cloud with almost all its functionality intact, including features like auto-complete and auto-formatting as well as built-in collaboration and a way to link the spreadsheet results to emails and Web pages.

Now Balmer has been in charge at Microsoft for a while now and the time has come to take a real close look at things. The Yahoo (YHOO) deal was a fiasco for Yahoo but had the deal been accepted, it would have meant Microsoft paid $40 billion for a company worth $15 billion today. Not good..

The desktop software model is dying thank to Google (GOOG) and Balmer is being dragged into. Ozzie is already there, why not let him run the show?

It is a question the Board must begin to consider…


Disclosure (“none” means no position):None
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Circuit City To Be Liquidated..

35,000 folks will lose their jobs..they can thank former CEO Phil Schoonover. What is sad is that it did not have to happen, there were many opportunities to save it. What Schoonover did should be criminal…..criminal…

Wall St. Newsletters

The News:

Circuit City Stores Inc. says it has reached an agreement with liquidators to sell the merchandise in its 567 U.S. stores after failing to find a buyer or a refinancing deal.

The second-biggest electronics retailer in the nation says in court papers it has appointed Great American Group LLC, Hudson Capital Partners LLC, SB Capital Group LLC and Tiger Capital Group LLC as liquidators.

Calls to the Richmond, Va.-based company and the liquidators were not immediately returned.

Circuit City filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in November. U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Kevin Huennekens gave the company permission to liquidate if a buyout was not achieved.

In June of 2007 I said:
“As a trade, any good news could vault shares up immediately. But, I do not see the conditions that could create that good news anytime soon. Maybe they could get bought out and that would cause shares to jump, but, I am reluctant to invest on the prayer someone rescues them. An Eddie Lampert, based on past history would just be as likely to wait for these buffoons to run it into bankruptcy and buy it there even cheaper than now. Why pay a premium to the current price when in bankruptcy he could get it for a fraction of it?

At their current rate CC will be out of cash before Thanksgiving and then the fun really starts. This assumes they do not start ramping up debt to pay for operations and also assumes no further economic slowdown. Should the economy slide even more, see ya…”

Then CEO Schoonover then fired good employees to save costs causing sales to plummet, ramped up debt, lowered bonus levels for his hand picked executives, Spurned a possible takeover, spurned an official offer from Blockbuster (BBI), was actually interviewed by the WSJ about “how to execute a turnaround”, tried some new platforms and had one of the most visited web site during the 2007 holiday season but due to high prices could not convert them to sales.

Today is the result….sad for those losing jobs..


Disclosure (“none” means no position):None
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

IEA Report Shows OPEC Supply & Production Decline for Crude

Wall St. Newsletters

Highlights of the latest OMR
dated: 16 January 2009

**Forecast global oil demand in 2009 is revised down by 1.0 mb/d, following a halving of assumed GDP growth to 1.2%, given the worsening outlook. Global oil demand is now projected at 85.3 mb/d in 2009 (‑0.6% or -0.5 mb/d year-on-year). The 2008 estimate is revised down 70 kb/d to 85.8 mb/d (-0.3% or -0.3 mb/d versus 2007). The expected two-year contraction in oil demand would be the first since 1982 and 1983.

**Global oil supply was flat in December at 86.2 mb/d, with curbed OPEC output offset by gains elsewhere. Non-OPEC supply for 2008 and 2009 is forecast at 49.5 mb/d and 50.0 mb/d, lowered by 60 kb/d and 30 kb/d versus last month’s report. 2008 output declined by 150 kb/d, partly due to the first fall in Russian supply since 1996. 2009 growth is forecast at 0.5 mb/d, in addition to a 0.6 mb/d increment in OPEC NGLs.

**December OPEC crude supply was 30.9 mb/d, down 330 kb/d versus November. This was 1 mb/d below September 2008 levels, and nearly 2 mb/d below mid-2008 highs. OPEC agreed a new target of 24.8 mb/d from January, equivalent to OPEC-13 output of 28.2 mb/d versus a reduced 2009 ‘call’ of 29.5-30.0 mb/d.

**1Q09 global refinery throughput is forecast at 72.3 mb/d, 1.2 mb/d lower than last month’s report. Weaker global demand and poor economics continue to hamper crude runs. Evidence of more structural changes to the refining industry is emerging in addition to reduced plant operation rates.

**OECD industry stocks fell by 2.0 mb to 2,658 mb in November, as a US build was offset by lower European crude and Pacific distillates. Despite a downward revision to October data, end-November forward demand cover remains high at 56.4 days on lower OECD demand. Preliminary December data indicate an OECD draw of 8.0 mb.

**Crude oil prices rose to nearly $50/bbl in early January, supported by cold weather, the Russian/Ukrainian gas crisis and fighting in Gaza. Subsequently, weak global refinery demand and an increasing crude overhang have pressured Brent futures to currently around $45/bbl, while WTI was at $35/bbl, distorted by record-high Cushing stocks.

So, the key here is that despite the global recession currently underway, supply demand is still about equal. That means any increase in economic (particularly manufacturing or infrastructure work) activity will tilt the balance and any geopolitical event could cause a run on oil (DBO), (USO), (DXO).

Is oil going back to $147, not without a major event (but, is that so far out of the question?). But to think it could double from here this year is within the realm of reasonableness. Global gov’t stimulus is going to be tilted towards “shovel in the ground” projects and that means oil demand rises. Supply is down and both OPEC and Non-OPEC production has been curtailed also. Production increases will lag and demand increase so price pressure will be upwards.

Regarding production the report says:
“Forecast non‐OPEC production is trimmed by 290 kb/d for 4Q08 and 345 kb/d for 1Q09, then by
around 150 kb/d for the remainder of 2009. Longer‐than‐expected outages affecting the GOM and
Azerbaijan curb early 2009 supply, as do weaker expectations for the North Sea and Australasia.
Forecast 2009 production from Russia and Canada is trimmed on fiscal and investment barriers and
field underperformance, while weaker expectations also now prevail for Malaysia and Vietnam.”

“OPEC‐11 production, excluding Iraq and Indonesia, fell by 825 kb/d in November, representing apparent compliance with the 1.5 mb/d cuts in target output agreed on 24 October of around 55%. However, as noted above, further reductions are also scheduled for December supply. OPEC Ministers gathered in Cairo on 29 November, ahead of their next scheduled meeting in Algeria on 17 December. In the end, no further decision on output policy was taken, due apparently to uncertainties over upcoming winter weather and the fact that it was too early to judge the impact of production curbs only put in place from 1 November.”

The December meeting resulted in further production cuts..

FULL REPORT:
1/16/2009 IEA Report

Publish at Scribd or explore others: Periodicals & Report crude oil iea


Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long DXO
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Friday’s Links- After This Week, Some Laughs

New Mac, Bin Laden, Geithner,

Wall St. Newsletters


Apple Introduces Revolutionary New Laptop With No Keyboard

– Boosts sales of cassette players

– Bootleg Turbo Tax

Disclosure (“none” means no position):
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Follow ValuePlays on Your Kindle

The blog has just been added to the kindle store at Amazon (AMZN). Follow this link to get it

Wall St. Newsletters


Disclosure (“none” means no position):
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Is Ulrich’s Move at Target Good for Bill Ackman? $$

A new CEO always makes some changes. Will Steinhafel look closer at Pershing Square’s proposal?

Wall St. Newsletters

Here is the news:

The WSJ Reports:

Target Corp. said chairman Bob Ulrich will retire at the end of the month, and will be succeeded by Chief Executive Gregg Steinhafel, completing a transition that began when Mr. Steinhafel was tapped for his current post a year ago.

Mr. Ulrich will become chairman emeritus, the retailer said.

The 53-year old Mr. Steinhafel joined Target in 1979 and became president in 1999. Target announced last January that he would succeed Mr. Ulrich as CEO, although he didn’t take the reins until last May. He was named to the board two years ago.

Mr. Ulrich has spent his entire 41-year career at Target and its predecessor company, Dayton’s, starting as a merchandise trainee. He became its president in 1984 and chairman and CEO three years later. Mr. Ulrich is credited with creating Target’s “cheap chic” marketing strategy some 20 years ago.

Like so many other retailers, Target has been struggling with slackening sales as shoppers rein in discretionary spending in the face of the housing-market collapse, the financial-markets meltdown, gyrating gasoline prices and tight credit. Last week Target said its December same-store sales fell 4.1%, in line with its expectations. But it said that markdowns “pressured profits.”

In addition to slowing sales, Target’s profits have suffered as an increasing number of its shoppers default on credit-card payments.

“As we look to the future, we are completely confident in Gregg’s leadership and his ability to build on Bob Ulrich’s legacy by continuing to deliver a superior guest experience,” said Vice Chairman Jim Johnson.

Now, let’s look back at the proposal from Ackman:

The plan was endorsed by Lazard.

Target (TGT) is facing increasing credit card losses on it portfolio. It should be noted that these losses are smaller that would have been had they not listened to Ackman and sold 1/2 the portfolio to JP Morgan (JPM).

What the transaction proposed by Ackman does (listen to the presentation for more detail) is frees up a very valuable commodity right now for any retailer….cash. It lowers land acquisition costs for expansion, increases cash flow to the retailer, lowers capex costs and more.

What is not clear was why the Ackman deal was really declined. Here is the press release put out at the time.

Here is the interesting part. When this was issued, Ackman’s reply was that he would “wait until after the holiday’s to address concern’s with management”. Now we see Ulrich retire. Are the two actions related? Was Ulrich standing in the way of the deal and did he hold sway over management and the rest of the board? Did Ackman know this was coming and was this the reason for his dropping the issue for the time being?


Disclosure (“none” means no position):None
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Apple: MSM vs Bloggers

Jim Goldman had a tough (deservedly so) 24 hours. Watch. After essentially mocking and condescending blogger’s reports Apple’s (AAPL) Steve Jobs was sick, Goldman now has explaining to do.

Wall St. Newsletters

CNBC’s own Dylan Ratigan takes him to task.

“Fake Steve Jobs” says he got “punked” by the Apple spin machine. The comment got Fake Steve banned from the network.

Notable Statements:
Dennis Kneale says “The dirty secret of journalism is that you have to believe most of what you are told”

There was a very interesting exchange later in which Goldman says “Until I am privy to Steve Jobs’ medical record all I am telling you is what my sources tell me who I trust and what the company tells me.”

Then Kneale pipes back in and says “Goldman reported what he was told and that’s what a good journalist does”.

Fake Steve make the best point when he says “If your just going to repeat press releases, why have the press, why not just let Apple put out press releases and why have a Bureau out in Silicon Valley?”

Here is the problem. If you had just listened to Goldman for the past 8 months you would have believed until last week everything with Jobs was fine. Had you read blogs, doubt would have crept into your mind. What you did with that information would have been up to you. The point is that you would have had more information to make a decision.

The same could be said of CNBC’s Phil LeBeau in his coverage of the automakers Ford (F), GM (GM) and Chrysler.. Both Goldman and LeBeau are careful to protect their access to those they cover by not being overtly critical of them. When they are critical is is posed as “there are those who say……” and then “how do you respond to that……”

Fake Steve was right in saying why have the press there and why not just let them put out press releases. The only purpose Goldman and LeBeau serve in their respective jobs is to publicly disclosed those release and allow those they cover to strategically leaked information they want out in the public. They are information conduit for the company’s they cover, they are not doing a public service to viewers.

LeBeau’s coverage is especially aggregious as he covers an industry that one would be hard to find has been more mismanaged for the past three decades the US automakers. Yet, if one goes back and looks at the coverage of Detroit from LeBeau, it is painfully apologetic to them and his defense of theory need for bailout funds could only have come from the PR departments of the auto makers.

Now, if that is what they are supposed to be then that is fine, but let’s not pretend we are doing something else and more importantly, lets not talk so dismissively about those who are not acting in that role and who are raising questions that ought to be answered.

If the MSM wonders why they become less relevant on a daily basis, they need only look at these examples…

for ore on the Jobs angles, please read The Ponderings of Woodrow

Disclosure (“none” means no position):None
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

2008 Foreclosures Jump 81%, Dimon Sees Loan Demand Fall

From Realty Trac….

Wall St. Newsletters

RealtyTrac®, the leading online marketplace for foreclosure properties, today released its 2008 U.S. Foreclosure Market Report™, which shows a total of 3,157,806 foreclosure filings — default notices, auction sale notices and bank repossessions — were reported on 2,330,483 U.S. properties during the year, an 81 percent increase in total properties from 2007 and a 225 percent increase in total properties from 2006. The report also shows that 1.84 percent of all U.S. housing units (one in 54) received at least one foreclosure filing during the year, up from 1.03 percent in 2007.

Foreclosure filings were reported on 303,410 U.S. properties in December, up 17 percent from the previous month and up nearly 41 percent from December 2007. Despite the spike in December, foreclosure activity for the fourth quarter was down nearly 4 percent from the previous quarter but still up nearly 40 percent from the fourth quarter of 2007.

RealtyTrac publishes the largest and most comprehensive national database of foreclosure and bank-owned properties, with over 1.5 million properties from over 2,200 counties across the country, and is the foreclosure data provider to MSN Real Estate, Yahoo! Real Estate and The Wall Street Journal’s Real Estate Journal.

“State legislation that slowed down the onset of new foreclosure activity clearly had an effect on fourth quarter numbers overall, but that effect appears to have worn off by December,” said James J. Saccacio, chief executive officer of RealtyTrac. “The big jump in December foreclosure activity was somewhat surprising given the moratoria enacted by both Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, along with programs from some of the major lenders and loan servicers aimed at delaying foreclosure actions against distressed homeowners.

“Clearly the foreclosure prevention programs implemented to-date have not had any real success in slowing down this foreclosure tsunami. And the recent California law, much like its predecessors in Massachusetts and Maryland, appears to have done little more than delay the inevitable foreclosure proceedings for thousands of homeowners.”

The California law (SB1137), which required lenders to provide written notice of their intent to initiate foreclosure proceedings 30 days prior to issuing a notice of default (NOD), resulted in a reduction of NODs from 44,278 in August to 21,665 in September. Notice of Default filings then surged by 122 percent, to over 42,000, in December. Similar patterns have occurred in other states, such as Massachusetts and Maryland, where similar types of foreclosure prevention legislation has been enacted.

Nevada, Florida, Arizona post top state foreclosure rates in 2008
More than 7 percent of Nevada housing units (one in 14) received at least one foreclosure notice in 2008, giving it the nation’s highest state foreclosure rate for the year. A total of 77,693 Nevada properties received a foreclosure filing during the year, an increase of nearly 126 percent from 2007 and an increase of nearly 530 percent from 2006.

Florida registered the nation’s second highest state foreclosure rate in 2008, with 4.52 percent of its housing units (one in 22) receiving at least one foreclosure filing during the year, and Arizona registered the nation’s third highest state foreclosure rate, with 4.49 percent of its housing units (one in 22) receiving at least one foreclosure filing during the year.

Other states with Top 10 foreclosure rates for 2008 were California, Colorado, Michigan, Ohio, Georgia, Illinois and New Jersey.

California, Florida, Arizona post highest 2008 foreclosure totals
A total of 523,624 California properties received a foreclosure filing in 2008, the nation’s highest state total. Foreclosure activity in the state increased nearly 110 percent from 2007 and nearly 498 percent from 2006.

With 385,309 properties receiving a foreclosure filing in 2008, Florida documented the second highest state total. Florida foreclosure activity increased 133 percent from 2007 and nearly 412 percent from 2006.

Arizona’s 2008 total of 116,911 properties receiving a foreclosure filing was third highest among the states. Foreclosure activity in Arizona increased 203 percent from 2007 and 655 percent from 2006.

Other states with Top 10 totals for 2008 were Ohio, Michigan, Illinois, Texas, Georgia, Nevada and New Jersey.

Sunbelt cities plus Detroit land on top 10 metro foreclosure rates list
With 9.46 percent of its housing units (one in 11) receiving a foreclosure filing during the year, Stockton, Calif., registered the highest foreclosure rate among the nation’s 100 largest metropolitan areas in 2008. Other California cities in the top 10 were Riverside-San Bernardino at No. 3 (8.02 percent, or one in 12 housing units); Bakersfield and No. 4 (6.17 percent, or one in 16 housing units); and Sacramento at No. 9 (5.20 percent, or one in 19 housing units).

Las Vegas documented the second highest metro foreclosure rate in 2008, with 8.89 percent of its housing units (one in 11) receiving a foreclosure filing during the year.

More than 6 percent of Phoenix housing units (one in 17) received a foreclosure filing during the year, giving the city the fifth highest metro foreclosure rate in 2008.

The foreclosure rate in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., ranked No. 6, with 5.95 percent of the metro area’s housing units (one in 17) receiving a foreclosure filing in 2008. Other Florida cities in the top 10 were Orlando at No. 7 (5.48 percent, or one in 18 housing units) and Miami at No. 8 (5.21 percent, or one in 19 housing units).

With 4.52 percent of its housing units (one in 22) receiving a foreclosure filing during the year, Detroit registered the tenth highest metro foreclosure rate in 2008.

On today’s earnings call, JP Morgan (JPM) CEO Jamie Dimon said they saw “loan demand slowing”. this is bad for housing as it means refinancing and purchases are also slowing. It may be a function of people waiting for lower interest rates, it may be a function of tighter lending standards, it may be a function of job losses or the fear of them, and it is most likely a function of all three.

Either way and no matter how it is divided, it is not good news going forward.


Disclosure (“none” means no position):None
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Thursday’s Links

3 scary things, Palm Pre, Hedge funds, 60 Minutes

Wall St. Newsletters

Oh boy

– Everyone loves this phone

Track them

– More reaction to the piece

Disclosure (“none” means no position):
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Why A Second Housing Wave is Inevitable $$

I just do not see how we avoid this…the numbers are just too big..

Wall St. Newsletters

Veneroso Why the Second Wave is Inevitable 6/2008

Publish at Scribd or explore others: Presentations & Slid mortgages recession. banking


Disclosure (“none” means no position):
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

World Bank Commodity Presentation 6/2007 $$

Regarding oil…”If a tsunami of rabid investment and speculative commodity derivative demands hits the commodity markets, it must drive the forward price more above marginal cost than in a
normal bull cycle. The higher the price is driven above marginal cost the more new supply will be encouraged. These high prices will also lead to a more assiduous effort by commodity consumers to economize and substitute, thereby rationing demand. If unusual commodity derivative demands take prices very high and on a sustained basis, the resulting surpluses that will eventually take down these prices will be all the larger.”

Wall St. Newsletters

Here is the presentation on Oil, Metals & Gold
Veneroso Frank-World Bank Presentation Commodity Bubble Metals Manipulation-6!14!2007

Publish at Scribd or explore others: Business Presentations & Slid kuwait bubbles

It is a thesis I agree with. Oil was in a bubble in 2008, and the downside now is the overreaction to that bubble popping. Somewhere is the middle is a good price. Fortunately, the middle is about 100% higher than current levels. We’ll see..

Tickers to play oil: (USO), (DBO), (DXO)

To play gold: (GLD)


Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long DBO, DXO, none
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books
garding oil

Categories
Articles

Wal-Mart CEO Downbeat on 2009 $$

Why does it matter? Wal-Mart (WMT) is the proxy for the US economy now.

Wall St. Newsletters

From Reuters

The chief executive of Wal-Mart Stores Inc (WMT) said on Monday he expects the U.S. economy to remain extraordinarily challenging in the first half of the year and that he was not expecting a quick turnaround.

Lee Scott made the comments at the National Retail Federation’s annual conference being held in New York. He described it as his last public speech as head of the world’s largest retailer before retiring on February 1. Scott said the U.S. government’s efforts to stimulate the economy should have “some impact,” but added: “I don’t see anything that tells me it’s going to turn around quickly.”

“The second half of the year, you would hope, would be better,” he said. “We all hope by next Christmas it certainly isn’t any worse.” Wal-Mart, the discount giant, has been gaining market share in the last year as consumers seek out its low prices on items such as food and medicine to stretch limited budgets.

But a year-long recession, mounting job losses and tighter access to credit combined to produce the worst holiday sales season in nearly four decades, according to the International Council of Shopping Centers. Wal-Mart was not immune to the harsh climate and last week posted lower-than-expected December sales and cut its fourth-quarter profit forecast.

FUNDAMENTAL SHIFT IN SPENDING

Scott said this downturn may fundamentally change people’s spending habits.

“I’m not necessarily convinced that just when all this liquidity and things hit, if you’re going to have the same immediate desire to go back to consumption and debt,” he said, referring to a potential U.S. government stimulus plan. “There are a lot of young people who have learned what it’s like when you are living on the edge and the bad times come.”

Here is the thing. After years of irrational debt, American reacted very rational when they were issued stimulus checks this summer. They paid bills and paid off debt. No matter what comes out of Washington this spring, there is no reason to think US consumers are going on a spending spree anytime soon. There has been a fundamental shift in behavior and the reaction to those summer checks proves it. That means anemic growth at best this year.

None of this takes into account the upcoming Alt-A mortgage train wreck barreling down on a staggering housing market, the possibility of inflation due to the flooding of the market with US dollars, foreigners losing interest in US debt causing a rise in interest rates, etc.

This is just the consumers behavior….

Are we doomed? Hell no. Are we going to enter a depression? No. None of that means the next year or two are going to be pretty or easy though. Just do not expect too much..


Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long WMT
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Wednesday’s Links

Bolling, Obama’s Stimulus, Math, Shaq

Wall St. Newsletters

Gold and Platinum

Doomed to fail

– Try again Prez?

– How much could he possibly have to say?

Disclosure (“none” means no position):
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

My Dire 2009 Outlook, A Rebuttal

So, after my post yesterday I received the following email (reprinted with permission) from a money manager. I am posting it verbatim (only company names added to tickers) and readers can judge who they think is correct…please comment..

Wall St. Newsletters

First, my post from yesterday.
1- Financials:
Will not be touching them and are currently waiting for Wells Fargo (WFC) to rally a bit to sell out of it. Why? I no longer know the rules of investing in them. TARP and its requirements change almost daily. Going forward, the term (interest) the Gov’t demands and the shareholder dilution that accompanies them will become more onerous. That is bad news. Also, the second body blow from housing is due this year and next. That means more suffering for financials and shareholders.

Now, this does not mean I will never invest in them again, just that I think in 2010 we will still be able to buy them at these levels or lower. Is there value in financials? I just cannot quantify it as long as we have shifting rules from the Gov’t.

2- The Market
Up to 9000, then back to 8000 all year. The market will bounce like a ball but never really go anywhere. I think the risk is to the downside as the recession worsens. Unemployment ought to pass 10%, GDP will be negative for the year and credit is still drying up. So, given those, how do we go to 10,000?

That being said, it is a traders market. If you sell options you can make some money here. If you trade the rang you can also. If you are not a trader, don’t try to be one. Be who you are

3- Oil
Have written a lot about it recently. Why? Demand has fallen true, but the unreported story is production has fallen off a cliff also. Oil is not like a faucet. It cannot just be turned back on. A drilling project shuttered because of low prices today cannot just be flipped back on when prices recover. There is a tremendous lag. As crazy as prices were at $147, they are equally as crazy at $47. US production continues to fall, Mexico’s has plummeted and OPEC is more in power than ever. That only serve to heighten the Geo-Political risk of oil. Translation? One wacko can cause a global oil price spike.

I see the most value here now, or at least a market unfettered by arbitrary Gov’t intervention. Yes, I know that most foreign oil companies are govt’t owned, what I am saying is that if you buy oil today, your ownership cannot be diluted by the gov’t like it can and is in equities today.

4- The dollar and inflation….
Has anyone ever seen a scenario when massive supply of an item has not caused a devaluation of it? How can the current US Gov’t’s “running the dollar printing presses full tilt” like they are now NOT lead to a devaluation of the dollar? Here is the problem. The gov’t WANTS inflation to return. It will increase home prices, increase to prices manufacturers get for their goods, increase equity values etc. The problem is, gov’t always overdoes it. That means that they will pump too much into the system and inflation will get away from them.

That genie, once out of the bottle is only pot back in by inflicting more pain on the economy. It then becomes a vicious circle…

The reader email:

“The history from the 1930 shows a Real GDP that has been quite steady when you average out the results of 3.9% in 1930 to 3.17% at present. You can see the annual fluctuations in the chart of Real GDP-below, but we are not investing for 12mos but for ~5yrs. So….my advice is to trust the history and expect 3.0%-3.2% for the next 5yrs-10yrs as well. Certainly there is an inflation risk that Bernanke needs to offset with a vigorous reduction in liquidity as monetary velocity recovers, but my guess is that he will be sensitive to this and that we are more likely to see inflation at less than 2% THAN see it soar to 7%+.

In my view to be able to buy GE (GE) at the current level assuming a future 20% ROE and a 1.4xBV I calculate that I am getting a 14%+ Owner’s Earnings. Since the market capitalizes earnings back to the core inflation + Real GDP = Current Market Rate of Return when psychology improves (I expect this to be at the 5% level in 2yrs-3yrs), THEN an investment in many issues today with GE’s pricing could easily triple.

The only time the market was last priced so that stocks were showing such high earnings yields and owner’s earnings was during high periods of inflation 1974 and 1982 during which 11% core inflation + Real GDP = ~14%. THIS IS NOT THE FACT TODAY WITH INFLATION AT 2.4% AND FALLING!!

I see much to like at present. Oil (DBO) will rise. Many good issues like EOG Resources (EOG), Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ), Suncor (SU) and etc look as attractive as GE. Remember oil cannot rise above its economic value or its value to the economy. Oil at too high a price causes the economy to slow and price then self corrects. Oil can only rise to a level that benefits economic growth.

Higher oil prices spurs investment in alternatives and alternative technologies. We are in a transition period during which weak oil supply will force invention and result in other energy sources not yet deemed viable or even discovered. My favorite economic text is Julian Simon’s “Ultimate Resource II” in which he wrote that the greatest misunderstanding investors seem to have is our own inventive force and its hidden hand within the economy to wring sea change. As OB1 said, “Trust the force!”

I am more bullish than you.”

This is what I love about this stuff. One of us will be right. For the record, I hope the reader is as my long portfolio will do VERY well (I am not short anything). I just do not think he is, for 2009. 2010 may be a different scenario but we need to get through this year first. If 2008 did not teach you a lot can change in the course of a year, nothing will.

So readers, who is right? Please comment and keep it constructive…


Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long DBO, GE, none
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Pershing’s McGuire Named Borders Chairman $$

So, we now know what the delay was for in the Pershing / Borders financing agreement.

Wall St. Newsletters

Borders Group (BGP) today announced that Richard “Mick” McGuire, 32, has been appointed non-executive Chairman of the company’s Board of Directors, effective today. He replaces Larry Pollock, 61, who has been non-executive Chairman since July 2006 and has been a Director since August 1995. Pollock will remain on the Board as a Director.

McGuire joined the Board in January 2008 in connection with his role as a partner at Pershing Square Capital Management, L.P., which is Borders Group’s largest investor. At Pershing Square, McGuire served as a member of the investment team exploring investment opportunities in industries including retail, consumer products, business services and financial services. He is now departing Pershing Square to pursue entrepreneurial interests. Prior to Pershing Square, McGuire held positions at private equity funds J.H. Whitney & Co., and Stonington Partners, Inc. He holds a master’s degree in business administration (MBA) from Harvard Business School and a bachelor’s degree from Princeton University.

“Mick is extremely smart and capable,” said Pershing Square founder and Chief Executive Officer Bill Ackman. “As a major shareholder of Borders, I am delighted with Mick’s appointment to Chairman. I look forward to the company’s progress under Mick’s and CEO Ron Marshall’s stewardship.”

“In the short time that I have worked with Mick, I am impressed with his constructive input, sound judgment and overall support of the company,” said Borders Group Chief Executive Officer Ron Marshall. “I look forward to working more closely with Mick in the expanded role of Chairman and with Mike Archbold in his new role as Lead Director. On behalf of the entire Board and management team, I also want to thank Larry for his years of service as Chairman and am pleased that he’ll remain with the Board as a Director.”

As noted, Michael G. Archbold has been named Lead Director. Archbold, 48, joined the Board in December 2007. He is Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of The Vitamin Shoppe, a position he has held since 2007. Previously, Archbold served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial and Administrative Officer of Saks Fifth Avenue. Prior to Saks, Archbold was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of AutoZone and earlier served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Booksellers Division of Barnes & Noble, Inc.
Pollock, who as noted remains on the Board, is Managing Partner of investment firm Lucky Stars Partners LLC. Previously, he was President, and later Chief Executive Officer, of Cole National Corporation, which operates retail vision and gift stores and was sold to Luxottica Group SpA in 2004. Prior to Cole National, Pollock served as President and Chief Executive Officer of HomePlace, Inc., and earlier was President, Chief Operating Officer and a Director of jewelry retailer Zale Corporation.

It’s Ackman’s ball now. Largest shareholder, Chairman and Chief Financer all in one (two actually but one sounds better).

It will be real interesting to watch..


Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long BGP
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books