ValuePlays

For those having problems with Internet Explorer, I fully concur with Mr. Mossberg on Firefox’s latest offering

Read it here

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Hovnanian’s (HOV) CEO speaks.

Blah, blah, blah a loss. We all expected that. The key here is what he is seeing out there now. Not necessarily improvement, but stabilization. At this point, that would be fantastic news for the industry. Buyers have been sitting waiting for what they feel is the bottom, when the presume it to be here, they will act, fast.

This backs yesterday’s post on the subject.

Disclosure (“none” means no position):None

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Radioshack, Congress, Secrets, Gumshoe

– Can it?

– Always blaming someone

– Busted

– Do not even buy a stock based on a mailing before you check here….ever

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Radioshack, Congress, Secrets, Gumshoe

– Can it?

– Always blaming someone

– Busted

– Do not even buy a stock based on a mailing before you check here….ever

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Discussed: MBIA (MBI), Ambac (ABK), Lehman (LEH),Yahoo (YHOO), Icahn, Oil (USO)

Best quote: About Yahoo management regarding Icahn, “I think perhaps they should have took him more seriously in the beginning”…Great..

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

Disclosure (“none” means no position):None

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

THURSDAY’S PICKS
Jeff Macke recommends getting long Disney (DIS) $34.35

Guy Adami suggests Starwood (HOT) $47.85

Karen Finerman and Pete Najarian both think Microsoft (MSFT) $27.54 is a buy

WEDNESDAY’S PICKS
For the second day in a row Jeff Macke recommends shorting the Dow by getting long the Short Dow30 ProShares (DOG) $62.60 CLOSE $62.72 GAIN

Guy Adami suggests getting long Celgene (CELG) $61.31 CLOSE $62.83 GAIN

Karen Finerman thinks Aetna (AET) $45.65 is a buy.CLOSE $46.53 GAIN

Pete Najarian prefers Norfolk Southern (NSC) $65.50 on the pullback. CLOSE $65 LOSS

2008 Records:
Brian Schaeffer= 0-1
Carter Worth= 1-1
Jon Najarian= 4-3
Jeff Macke= 43-36-1
Tim Seymore= 17-14
Guy Adami= 47-36
Pete Najarian= 42-38
Karen Finerman= 41-32-1
Joe Terrenova= 1-3

2007 Results (Since 6/21):
Guy Adami= 58-46 = 56%
Jeff Macke= 60-40 = 60%
Pete Najarian= 49-41 = 54%

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

This is priceless……..Yang now needs to go. He is poison to the company now.

Roy Bostock
Chairman
Yahoo! Inc.
701 First Avenue
Sunnyvale, CA 94089

Dear Mr. Bostock:

I have long been cynical about the effectiveness of many of the boards and
CEOs in this country and as a result the inability of our companies to compete.
I have constantly complained about how far CEOs and boards will go in order to
retain their jobs, yet even I am amazed at the length Jerry Yang and the Yahoo
board have gone to in order to entrench their positions and keep shareholders
from deciding if they wished to sell to Microsoft.

According to details in a complaint that I became aware of yesterday
(details Yahoo (YHOO) fought to keep under seal), Jerry Yang and a majority of the
board went to inordinate lengths to sabotage a Microsoft bid. The complaint
states: “Viewing employee retention as Microsoft’s (MSFT) Achilles heel, Yang
engineered an ingenious defense creating huge incentives for a massive employee
walkout in the aftermath of a change in control. The plan gives each of Yahoo’s
14,000 full-time employees the right to quit his or her job and pocket generous
termination benefits at any time during the two years following a takeover, by
claiming a “substantive adverse alteration” in job duties or responsibilities.”
The damage to Microsoft “is compounded by the fact that Yahoo’s thousands of
engineers, known as “Technical Yahoos!,” have detailed job responsibilities and
qualifications.”

Most importantly, Microsoft might never be able to trust a CEO and board
who, while claiming to be negotiating in good faith, went behind their back and
adopted a “plan” which not only sabotages any Microsoft acquisition but went so
far as to completely disable its own ability to rescind the “plan” as long as
Microsoft’s offer remains pending. Until now I naively believed that
self-destructive doomsday machines were fictional devices found only in James
Bond movies. I never believed that anyone would actually create and activate one
in real life. I guess I never knew about Yang and the Yahoo Board. In my
opinion, it will be extremely difficult for Microsoft or other companies to
trust, work with and negotiate with a company that would go to these lengths.

It is insulting to shareholders that Yahoo for the last month has told us
that they are quite willing to negotiate a sale of the company to Microsoft and
cannot understand why Microsoft has walked away. However, the board conveniently
neglected to inform shareholders about the magnitude of the plan it installed
which made it practically impossible for Microsoft to stay at the bargaining
table. Could this have been the problem?

Even more deceitful are Yahoo’s actions toward its own employees, for whom
you claimed to have set up the “plan”. Management neglected to mention to these
same employees that Microsoft in its proposals had earmarked $1.5 billion of
retention incentives (representing over $100,000 per employee) meant to allay
any employee concerns.

Ironically, according to the complaint, this is not the first time that
Yahoo has denied shareholders the opportunity of selling to Microsoft at a large
premium. According to the complaint, in January 2007 Microsoft offered to
purchase Yahoo at $40 per share but the company rejected that proposal. On
January 31, 2008, Steve Ballmer emailed a letter to Jerry Yang and Roy Bostock
making a new proposal of $31 per share. The letter recounts Microsoft’s prior
efforts to acquire Yahoo and noted that Microsoft had given Yahoo time to
implement business strategies designed to turn the company around. These
strategies obviously didn’t work. The letter went on to state: “Our proposal
represents a 62% premium above the closing price of Yahoo! common stock of
$19.18 on January 31, 2008.” Yahoo not only turned down this proposal but
sabotaged it. An article in CNET News cited in the complaint sums it up by
stating, “Yahoo may indeed agree to Microsoft’s [offer], but it will be over
Jerry Yang’s dead body”.

I and many of your shareholders believe that the only way to salvage Yahoo
in the long if not short run is to merge with Microsoft. However, because of HSR
considerations, to complete a merger of this magnitude will take a period of
time. Even if by some stretch of the imagination the Yahoo board finally
determines to do the rational thing and sell the company, I fear that, in light
of Yang and the board’s recent actions in response to Microsoft’s overtures, it
may be too late to convince Microsoft to trust Yang and the current board to run
the company during that period while Microsoft sits on the sidelines with $45
billion at risk. Therefore, the best chance to bring Microsoft and Yahoo
together is to replace Yang and the current Yahoo board with a board that will
negotiate in good faith with Microsoft and in whom Microsoft will have trust to
operate the company during the long period between signing and closing.

You stated in a press release yesterday that, “Yahoo’s board of directors
including Jerry Yang has been crystal clear that it would consider any proposal
by Microsoft that was in the best interests of its shareholders.” However this
is not crystal clear to me. You have allegedly turned down a $40 offer. You have
turned down and sabotaged a $33 offer. Instead, you appear willing to negotiate
an “alternative” deal that in my opinion will be worth less than $33 but will
entrench the board and Jerry Yang. I understand how these actions are in the
best interests of management and a board whose members each receive $40,000 per
month for several days work, but it is hard for me to understand how these
actions are in the “best interests of the shareholders.”

However, despite your actions to date, there is still some possibility that
you can resuscitate a Microsoft offer for the company. The board can rescind the
“severance plan” that is the largest impediment to a Microsoft deal. You
currently can do this because Microsoft withdrew their bid 30 days ago. It is
time for you to stop misleading your shareholders with respect to Microsoft. It
has been reported today that when asked to talk about the Microsoft bid, Sue
Decker indicated that Microsoft made an offer which Yahoo’s board didn’t feel
was at an attractive enough price. However, one doesn’t have to be a rocket
scientist to realize there is a simple method to possibly achieve a higher
price. Simply rescind the poison pill “severance plan”, which would free up
approximately $2.4 billion and possibly even more which could be added to the
bid. It is also time to admit to your shareholders that the sev
erance plan was
not done for your employees (who you conveniently neglected to inform that
Microsoft had earmarked $1.5 billion in retention incentives for), but rather
was done simply as an entrenchment device and to impede a Microsoft bid. If you
are not completely disingenuous in your protestations concerning doing “the
right thing” for shareholders, you should rescind the severance plan
expeditiously and determine if Microsoft is still willing to purchase our
company and thereby create a true competitor for Google. I can only hope that
you will finally do what is in the “best interests of the shareholders.”

Sincerely yours,

CARL C. ICAHN

Disclosure (“none” means no position):None

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

This is priceless……..Yang now needs to go. He is poison to the company now.

Roy Bostock
Chairman
Yahoo! Inc.
701 First Avenue
Sunnyvale, CA 94089

Dear Mr. Bostock:

I have long been cynical about the effectiveness of many of the boards and
CEOs in this country and as a result the inability of our companies to compete.
I have constantly complained about how far CEOs and boards will go in order to
retain their jobs, yet even I am amazed at the length Jerry Yang and the Yahoo
board have gone to in order to entrench their positions and keep shareholders
from deciding if they wished to sell to Microsoft.

According to details in a complaint that I became aware of yesterday
(details Yahoo (YHOO) fought to keep under seal), Jerry Yang and a majority of the
board went to inordinate lengths to sabotage a Microsoft bid. The complaint
states: “Viewing employee retention as Microsoft’s (MSFT) Achilles heel, Yang
engineered an ingenious defense creating huge incentives for a massive employee
walkout in the aftermath of a change in control. The plan gives each of Yahoo’s
14,000 full-time employees the right to quit his or her job and pocket generous
termination benefits at any time during the two years following a takeover, by
claiming a “substantive adverse alteration” in job duties or responsibilities.”
The damage to Microsoft “is compounded by the fact that Yahoo’s thousands of
engineers, known as “Technical Yahoos!,” have detailed job responsibilities and
qualifications.”

Most importantly, Microsoft might never be able to trust a CEO and board
who, while claiming to be negotiating in good faith, went behind their back and
adopted a “plan” which not only sabotages any Microsoft acquisition but went so
far as to completely disable its own ability to rescind the “plan” as long as
Microsoft’s offer remains pending. Until now I naively believed that
self-destructive doomsday machines were fictional devices found only in James
Bond movies. I never believed that anyone would actually create and activate one
in real life. I guess I never knew about Yang and the Yahoo Board. In my
opinion, it will be extremely difficult for Microsoft or other companies to
trust, work with and negotiate with a company that would go to these lengths.

It is insulting to shareholders that Yahoo for the last month has told us
that they are quite willing to negotiate a sale of the company to Microsoft and
cannot understand why Microsoft has walked away. However, the board conveniently
neglected to inform shareholders about the magnitude of the plan it installed
which made it practically impossible for Microsoft to stay at the bargaining
table. Could this have been the problem?

Even more deceitful are Yahoo’s actions toward its own employees, for whom
you claimed to have set up the “plan”. Management neglected to mention to these
same employees that Microsoft in its proposals had earmarked $1.5 billion of
retention incentives (representing over $100,000 per employee) meant to allay
any employee concerns.

Ironically, according to the complaint, this is not the first time that
Yahoo has denied shareholders the opportunity of selling to Microsoft at a large
premium. According to the complaint, in January 2007 Microsoft offered to
purchase Yahoo at $40 per share but the company rejected that proposal. On
January 31, 2008, Steve Ballmer emailed a letter to Jerry Yang and Roy Bostock
making a new proposal of $31 per share. The letter recounts Microsoft’s prior
efforts to acquire Yahoo and noted that Microsoft had given Yahoo time to
implement business strategies designed to turn the company around. These
strategies obviously didn’t work. The letter went on to state: “Our proposal
represents a 62% premium above the closing price of Yahoo! common stock of
$19.18 on January 31, 2008.” Yahoo not only turned down this proposal but
sabotaged it. An article in CNET News cited in the complaint sums it up by
stating, “Yahoo may indeed agree to Microsoft’s [offer], but it will be over
Jerry Yang’s dead body”.

I and many of your shareholders believe that the only way to salvage Yahoo
in the long if not short run is to merge with Microsoft. However, because of HSR
considerations, to complete a merger of this magnitude will take a period of
time. Even if by some stretch of the imagination the Yahoo board finally
determines to do the rational thing and sell the company, I fear that, in light
of Yang and the board’s recent actions in response to Microsoft’s overtures, it
may be too late to convince Microsoft to trust Yang and the current board to run
the company during that period while Microsoft sits on the sidelines with $45
billion at risk. Therefore, the best chance to bring Microsoft and Yahoo
together is to replace Yang and the current Yahoo board with a board that will
negotiate in good faith with Microsoft and in whom Microsoft will have trust to
operate the company during the long period between signing and closing.

You stated in a press release yesterday that, “Yahoo’s board of directors
including Jerry Yang has been crystal clear that it would consider any proposal
by Microsoft that was in the best interests of its shareholders.” However this
is not crystal clear to me. You have allegedly turned down a $40 offer. You have
turned down and sabotaged a $33 offer. Instead, you appear willing to negotiate
an “alternative” deal that in my opinion will be worth less than $33 but will
entrench the board and Jerry Yang. I understand how these actions are in the
best interests of management and a board whose members each receive $40,000 per
month for several days work, but it is hard for me to understand how these
actions are in the “best interests of the shareholders.”

However, despite your actions to date, there is still some possibility that
you can resuscitate a Microsoft offer for the company. The board can rescind the
“severance plan” that is the largest impediment to a Microsoft deal. You
currently can do this because Microsoft withdrew their bid 30 days ago. It is
time for you to stop misleading your shareholders with respect to Microsoft. It
has been reported today that when asked to talk about the Microsoft bid, Sue
Decker indicated that Microsoft made an offer which Yahoo’s board didn’t feel
was at an attractive enough price. However, one doesn’t have to be a rocket
scientist to realize there is a simple method to possibly achieve a higher
price. Simply rescind the poison pill “severance plan”, which would free up
approximately $2.4 billion and possibly even more which could be added to the
bid. It is also time to admit to your shareholders that the severance plan was
not done for your employees (who you conveniently neglected to inform that
Microsoft had earmarked $1.5 billion in retention incentives for), but rather
was done simply as an entrenchment device and to impede a Microsoft bid. If you
are not completely disingenuous in your protestations concerning doing “the
right thing” for shareholders, you should rescind the severance plan
expeditiously and determine if Microsoft is still willing to purchase our
company and thereby create a true competitor for Google. I can only hope that
you will finally do what is in the “best interests of the shareholders.”

Sincerely yours,

CARL C. ICAHN

Disclosure (“none” means no position):None

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

It has come to my attention that Internet Explorer users are having trouble veiwing the blog. It seems they get only 1 post rather than a listing of 15 posts.

Firefox users have reported no issues. Please comment if you are having problems or have a fix for those who are

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

In three transactions Fairholme’s Bruce Berkowitz sold 76,000 shares of shipping container company TAL International.

Berkowitz now controls 2.46 million shares or just over 6% of the total.

From the filing:

1. Prior to this transaction, Fairholme Partners, L.P. was the direct holder of 828,932 shares of Common Stock and, following such transaction, is currently the direct holder of 820,332 shares of Common Stock. Prior to this transaction, Fairholme Ventures II, LLC was the direct holder of 828,832 shares of Common Stock and following such transaction, is currently the direct holder of 820,132 shares of Common Stock. Prior to this transaction, Fairholme Holdings, Ltd. was the direct holder of 828,933 shares of Common Stock and, following such transaction, is currently the direct holder of 820,233 shares of Common Stock.

Disclosure (“none” means no position):None

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books